2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania
2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania Turnout 76.5%[ 1] 5.2pp
County results
Congressional district results
Municipality results
Precinct results
Biden
40–50%
50–60%
60–70%
70–80%
80–90%
90–100%
Trump
40–50%
50–60%
60–70%
70–80%
80–90%
90–100%
Tie/No Votes
The 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania was held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as part of the 2020 United States presidential election in which all 50 states plus the District of Columbia participated.[ 3] Pennsylvania voters chose electors to represent them in the Electoral College via a popular vote, pitting the Republican Party 's nominee, President Donald Trump , and running mate Vice President Mike Pence against Democratic Party nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden , and his running mate California Senator Kamala Harris . Pennsylvania had 20 electoral votes in the Electoral College.[ 4]
Although Trump had won the state in 2016 by a narrow margin of 0.72%, Biden was able to reclaim the state, winning it by a similarly narrow 1.17% margin. Because of the way the state counted in-person ballots first, Trump started with a wide lead on election night. However, over the next few days, Biden greatly closed the margin due to outstanding votes from Democratic-leaning areas, most notably Philadelphia and Pittsburgh , as well as mail-in ballots from all parts of the state which strongly favored him. On the morning of November 6, election-calling organization Decision Desk HQ forecast that Biden had won Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes, and with them the election.[ 5] The following morning, November 7, at the same time that the Trump campaign was holding a press conference outside of a Philadelphia landscaping business ,[ 6] nearly all major news organizations followed suit and called Pennsylvania for Biden, proclaiming him president-elect .[ 7]
One key to Biden's success in the state was his improvement on Hillary Clinton 's margins in the large Philadelphia-area suburban counties: he won Bucks by 3.60% more than Clinton did, Delaware by 4.38% more, Montgomery by 4.80% more, and Chester —which Mitt Romney had narrowly won just eight years prior —by 6.60% more. At the same time, he reclaimed two of the three large industrial counties which had voted Democratic for at least six consecutive elections before Trump flipped them in 2016: Erie and Northampton . While Trump prevailed in the third, Luzerne County , he did so by a reduced margin with respect to 2016; and Biden increased the margin of victory in his birth county, Lackawanna County , which Trump had nearly flipped in 2016. Biden halted the four-election Democratic slide in formerly traditionally Democratic Westmoreland County , where, before 2020, Al Gore had been the last Democrat to improve on the previous nominee's vote share (and which had given Trump his margin in the state in 2016). He also improved on Clinton's margins in Lehigh County by 2.9% and won Allegheny County with the largest percentage of the vote since 1988; however, Biden's vote share in Philadelphia County actually declined slightly compared to Clinton's, although he still outperformed either Al Gore in 2000 or John Kerry in 2004 in the county. Biden became the first Democratic candidate running for president to garner at least 100,000 votes in the Republican stronghold county of Lancaster .[ 8] [ 9] He also became the second presidential candidate since 1964, the last time the county voted for a Democrat, to get at least 40% of the vote.[ 9] This was due to the large number of votes Biden received from the city of Lancaster and a competitive margin in voting precincts in and around Lititz and Columbia .[ 10]
Despite Biden's victory, Pennsylvania weighed in for this election as 3.3% more Republican than the national average. This is the second consecutive presidential election in which Pennsylvania voted to the right of the nation. Previously, it had not done so since 1948 . With Ohio , Florida , and Iowa backing the losing candidate for the first time since 1960 , 1992 , and 2000 respectively, this election established Pennsylvania, Wisconsin , and Michigan as the states with the longest bellwether streak still in effect today. The last time any of them voted against the winning candidate was 2004 , when all three voted for the losing Democrat John Kerry . Biden became the first Democrat to win the White House without carrying Luzerne County since Harry Truman in 1948 . This was the first election since 1932 that the county voted for the statewide loser.
Primary elections
The primary elections were originally scheduled for April 28, 2020, also originally joining several northeastern states in holding primaries on the same date, including Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New York, and Rhode Island.[ 11] On March 26, Pennsylvania joined several other states in moving its primary to June 2 due to the COVID-19 pandemic .[ 12]
Republican primary
Even though the Republican National Committee mailed Pennsylvania voters encouraging mail-in voting , describing it as a "convenient and secure" option, most Republicans expressed opposition to the prospect. Earlier, the Republican-controlled House blocked a proposal to mail every Pennsylvanian a mail-in ballot application. This was in response to President Trump's skepticism of the practice, expressing concern mail-in voting may result in voter fraud that would potentially benefit the Democratic Party.[ 13]
Trump was declared the winner in the Republican primary, and received all of the state's 34 pledged delegates to the 2020 Republican National Convention (the state also has 54 unpledged delegates).[ 15]
Democratic primary
2020 Pennsylvania Democratic presidential primary[ 16]
Candidate
Votes
%
Delegates[ 17]
Joe Biden
1,264,624
79.26
151
Bernie Sanders (withdrawn)
287,834
18.04
35
Tulsi Gabbard (withdrawn)
43,050
2.70
Total
1,595,508
100%
186
Green Caucus
The Green Caucus was held during April 2020 and was won by Howie Hawkins .[ 18]
General election
Final predictions
Polling
Graphical summary
Aggregate polls
2020 polls
Poll source
Date(s) administered
Sample size[ b]
Marginof error
Donald Trump Republican
Joe Biden Democratic
Jo Jorgensen Libertarian
Howie Hawkins Green
Other
Undecided
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. [ 36]
Nov 1–2
499 (LV)
± 4.3%
49% [ c]
48%
1%
-
0%[ d]
0%
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Oct 20 – Nov 2
6,045 (LV)
± 2%
47%[ e]
52%
-
-
–
–
Pulse Opinion Research /Rasmussen Reports [ 38]
Oct 31 – Nov 1
800 (LV)
± 3.5%
47%[ c]
50%
-
-
1%[ f]
–
Research Co. [ 39]
Oct 31 – Nov 1
450 (LV)
± 4.6%
46%
52%
-
-
2%[ g]
4%
AYTM /Aspiration [ 40]
Oct 30 – Nov 1
340 (LV)
–
49%
51%
-
-
–
–
Change Research /CNBC [ 41]
Oct 29 – Nov 1
699 (LV)
± 3.71%
46%
50%
2%
-
–
2%
Marist College /NBC [ 42]
Oct 29 – Nov 1
772 (LV)
± 4.4%
46%
51%
-
-
1%
2%
Monmouth University [ 43]
Oct 28 – Nov 1
502(RV)
± 4.4%
45%
50%
1%
-
0%[ h]
4%
502 (LV)
44%[ i]
51%
-
-
–
–
45%[ j]
50%
-
-
–
–
Swayable [ 44]
Oct 27 – Nov 1
1,107 (LV)
± 3.9%
48%
50%
2%
-
–
–
Data for Progress [ 45]
Oct 27 – Nov 1
1,417 (LV)
± 2.6%
45%
52%
2%
0%
0%[ k]
–
Ipsos /Reuters [ 46]
Oct 27 – Nov 1
673 (LV)
± 4.3%
45%[ l]
51%
1%
1%
2%[ m]
–
44%[ n]
51%
-
-
3%[ o]
2%
46%[ p]
52%
-
-
2%[ q]
–
Trafalgar [ 47]
Oct 30–31
1,062 (LV)
± 2.93%
48%
46%
2%
-
1%[ r]
4%
Frederick Polls /Compete Everywhere [ 48] [ A]
Oct 30–31
879 (LV)
± 3%
48%
52%
-
-
–
–
Insider Advantage /Center for American Greatness [ 49] [ B]
Oct 30–31
500 (LV)
± 4.4%
48.7%
47.4%
1.3%
-
–
2.6%
Siena College /NYT Upshot [ 50]
Oct 26–31
1,862 (LV)
± 2.4%
43%
49%
2%
-
0%[ s]
5%[ t]
Morning Consult [ 51]
Oct 22–31
2,686 (LV)
± 2%
43%
52%
-
-
–
–
Emerson College [ 52]
Oct 29–30
823 (LV)
± 3.3%
47%[ c]
52%
-
-
2%[ g]
–
AtlasIntel [ 53]
Oct 29–30
672 (LV)
± 4%
50%
49%
-
-
2%
–
Targoz Market Research /PollSmart [ 54]
Oct 25–30
998 (LV)
–
42%
56%
-
-
2%[ u]
–
Public Policy Polling /American Bridge PAC [ 55] [ C]
Oct 28–29
1,012 (V)
–
45%
52%
-
-
–
3%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 56]
Oct 26–29
2,125 (LV)
–
45%
50%
1%
-
1%
3%
Harvard-Harris /The Hill [ 57]
Oct 26–29
901 (LV)
–
46%
51%
-
-
–
3%
ABC /Washington Post [ 58]
Oct 24–29
824 (LV)
± 4%
44%
51%
3%
-
0%[ v]
1%
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 59]
Oct 23–28
419 (LV)
± 5.5%
44%
49%
-
-
4%[ w]
2%
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Oct 1–28
10,599 (LV)
± 1.5%
46%
52%
-
-
–
-
RMG Research /PoliticalIQ [ 60]
Oct 25–27
800 (LV)
± 3.5%
45%[ l]
51%
-
-
2%
2%
44%[ x]
52%
-
-
2%
2%
47%[ y]
49%
-
-
2%
2%
Quinnipiac University [ 61]
Oct 23–27
1,324 (LV)
± 2.7%
44%
51%
-
-
1%[ r]
4%
Swayable [ 62]
Oct 23–26
491 (LV)
± 6%
46%
52%
2%
-
–
–
Civiqs /Daily Kos [ 63]
Oct 23–26
1,145 (LV)
± 3%
45%
52%
-
-
2%[ g]
1%
Ipsos /Reuters [ 64]
Oct 20–26
655 (LV)
± 4.4%
44%[ l]
51%
3%
0%
1%[ z]
–
45%[ n]
50%
-
-
3%[ o]
2%
Insider Advantage /Center for American Greatness [ 65] [ B]
Oct 25
400 (LV)
± 4.9%
48.5%
45.5%
3.3%
-
–
2.8%
Trafalgar Group [ 66]
Oct 24–25
1,076 (LV)
± 2.91%
48%
48%
2%
-
1%[ r]
1%
Wick Surveys [ 67]
Oct 24–25
1,000 (LV)
± 3.1%
49%
47%
-
-
–
–
Franklin & Marshall College [ 68]
Oct 19–25
558 (LV)
± 5%
44%
50%
2%
-
1%[ aa]
3%
Univision /University of Houston /Latino Decisions/North Star Opinion Research[ 69]
Oct 17–25
723 (RV)
± 3.64%
45%
50%
-
-
3%[ ab]
2%
Gravis Marketing [ 70]
Oct 23
602 (LV)
± 4%
44%
51%
-
-
–
5%
Public Policy Polling /American Bridge PAC [ 71] [ D]
Oct 21–22
980 (V)
–
46%
51%
-
-
–
4%
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
Oct 17–21
1,577 (A)
3%
46%
52%
-
-
–
2%
YouGov /University of Wisconsin-Madison [ 73]
Oct 13–21
669 (LV)
± 4.45%
44%
52%
-
-
3%[ ac]
–
Citizen Data [ 74]
Oct 17–20
1,000 (LV)
± 3.1%
39%
44%
9%
0%
1%
7%
CNN /SSRS[ 75]
Oct 15–20
843 (LV)
± 4%
43%
53%
2%
-
1%[ ad]
1%
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 76]
Oct 13–20
416 (LV)
± 5.5%
44%
51%
-
-
2%[ ae]
4%
Morning Consult [ 51]
Oct 11–20
2,563 (LV)
± 1.9%
43%
52%
-
-
–
–
Fox News [ 77]
Oct 18–19
1,045 (LV)
± 3%
45%
50%
1%
-
1%[ af]
2%
Pulse Opinion Research /Rasmussen Reports [ 78]
Oct 18–19
800 (LV)
± 3.5%
47%
50%
-
-
2%[ q]
3%
Quinnipiac University [ 79]
Oct 16–19
1,241 (LV)
± 2.8%
43%
51%
-
-
1%[ r]
5%
Change Research /CNBC [ 80]
Oct 16–19
574 (LV)[ ag]
–
47%
49%
-
-
–
–
Suffolk University /USA Today [ 81] [1]
Oct 15–19
500 (LV)
± 4.4%
42%
49%
1%
-
4%[ ah]
4%
Ipsos /Reuters [ 82]
Oct 13–19
653 (LV)
± 4.4%
45%[ l]
49%
2%
0%
3%[ ai]
–
45%[ n]
49%
-
-
3%[ o]
4%
Trafalgar Group /Restoration PAC [ 83] [ E]
Oct 13–15
1,041 (LV)
± 2.96%
46%
48%
3%
-
2%[ g]
2%
HarrisX /The Hill [ 84]
Oct 12–15
1,289 (LV)
–
46%
51%
-
-
–
–
Insider Advantage /Center for American Greatness [ 85] [ B]
Oct 12–13
400 (LV)
± 4.9%
43%
46%
2%
-
–
9%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 86]
Oct 10–13
1,289 (LV)
–
43%[ ag]
51%
1%
0%
–
–
Trafalgar Group [ 87]
Oct 10–12
1,034 (LV)
± 2.97%
45%
47%
3%
-
3%[ ab]
2%
RMG Research /PoliticalIQ [ 88]
Oct 7–12
800 (LV)
–
43%[ l]
49%
1%
–
1%
6%
42%[ x]
50%
1%
–
1%
6%
45%[ y]
47%
1%
–
1%
6%
Civiqs /Rust Belt Rising [ 89] [ F]
Oct 8–11
600 (LV)
± 4.2%
45%
52%
-
-
2%[ g]
1%
Ipsos /Reuters [ 90]
Oct 6–11
622 (LV)
± 4.5%
45%[ l]
51%
1%
0%
2%[ aj]
–
44%[ n]
51%
-
-
1%[ ak]
4%
Morning Consult [ 91]
Oct 2–11
2,610 (LV)
± 1.9%
44%
52%
-
-
–
–
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 86]
Oct 9–10
1,145 (LV)
–
44%[ ag]
49%
1%
-
–
–
Whitman Insight Strategies [ 92]
Oct 5–9
517 (LV)
± 4.3%
46%
51%
-
-
1%[ r]
3%
Baldwin Wallace University [ 93]
Sep 30 – Oct 8
1,140 (LV)
± 3.1%
45%
50%
1%
0%
0%[ al]
4%
YouGov /CCES [ 94]
Sep 29 – Oct 7
2,703 (LV)
–
44%
52%
-
-
–
–
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 95]
Oct 4–6
927 (LV)
± 3.22%
42%
49%
1%
-
1%[ am]
7%
Emerson College [ 96]
Oct 4–5
688 (LV)
± 3.7%
47%[ c]
51%
-
-
2%[ g]
–
Quinnipiac University [ 97]
Oct 1–5
1,211 (LV)
± 2.8%
41%
54%
-
-
1%[ r]
3%
Ipsos /Reuters [ 98]
Sep 29 – Oct 5
605 (LV)
± 4.5%
45%
50%
-
-
2%[ an]
3%
Change Research /CNBC [ 99]
Oct 2–4
468 (LV)
–
46%
50%
-
-
–
–
Monmouth University [ 100]
Sep 30 – Oct 4
500 (RV)
± 4.4%
42%
54%
1%
-
0%[ h]
2%
500 (LV)
43%[ i]
54%
-
-
–
–
45%[ j]
53%
-
-
–
–
YouGov /CBS [ 101]
Sep 30 – Oct 2
1,287 (LV)
± 3.2%
44%
51%
-
-
2%[ ao]
5%
Siena College /NYT Upshot [ 102]
Sep 30 – Oct 2
706 (LV)
± 4.1%
42%
49%
3%
-
0%[ s]
5%[ t]
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Sep 1–30
4,613 (LV)
–
46%
52%
-
-
–
2%
ABC News /Washington Post [ 103]
Sep 21–26
567 (LV)
± 5.0%
45%
54%
-
-
0%[ ap]
1%
Siena College /NYT Upshot [ 104]
Sep 25–27
711 (LV)
± 4.3%
40%
49%
2%
-
0%[ s]
8%[ t]
TIPP /The Federalist [ 105]
Sep 24–26
774 (LV)
± 3.6%
45%
50%
-
-
1%[ aq]
4%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 106]
Sep 23–25
1,015 (LV)
± 3.08%
44%
50%
0%
–
1%[ am]
5%
Fox News [ 107]
Sep 20–23
856 (LV)
± 3%
44%
51%
2%
–
1%[ af]
2%
910 (RV)
± 3%
43%
51%
2%
–
2%[ ar]
3%
Baldwin Wallace University [ 108]
Sep 9–22
1,012 (LV)
± 3.6%
45%
47%
2%
0%
1%[ as]
5%
Trafalgar Group /Restoration PAC [ 109] [ E]
Sep 18–21
1,006 (LV)
± 2.99%
46%
48%
1%
1%
2%[ g]
2%
YouGov /UW-Madison Elections Research Center/Wisconsin State Journal [ 110]
Sep 10–21
642 (LV)
–
45%
49%
-
-
–
–
Change Research /CNBC [ 111]
Sep 18–20
579 (LV)
–
45%
49%
-
-
–
–
Franklin & Marshall College [ 112]
Sep 14–20
480 (LV)
± 7.8%
42%
48%
-
-
–
–
Hart Research Associates /Human Rights Campaign [ 113] [ G]
Sep 17–19
400 (LV)
± 4.9%
42%
53%
-
-
–
–
CPEC [ 114] [ H]
Sep 15–17
830 (LV)
± 2.3%
45%
50%
-
-
1%[ at]
4%
Trafalgar Group (R) [ 115]
Sep 15–17
1,006 (LV)
± 2.99%
45%
47%
2%
1%
2%[ g]
2%
Ipsos /Reuters [ 116]
Sep 11–16
611 (LV)
± 4.5%
46%
49%
-
-
2%[ an]
4%
Civiqs /Rust Belt Rising [ 117] [ F]
Sep 11–15
704 (RV)
± 4.4%
45%
52%
-
-
1%[ r]
2%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 118]
Sep 12–14
1,036 (LV)
± 3.04%
44%
49%
1%
1%
0%[ au]
5%
Climate Nexus [ 119]
Sep 8–11
659 (RV)
± 4%
43%
48%
-
-
3%[ av]
6%
Benenson Strategy Group /GS Strategy Group /AARP [ 120]
Aug 28 – Sep 8
1,600 (LV)
± 2.5%
46%
49%
-
-
1%[ aw]
4%
Marist College /NBC News [ 121]
Aug 31 – Sep 7
771 (LV)
± 4.4%
44%
53%
-
-
1%
2%
Morning Consult [ 122]
Aug 29 – Sep 7
2,227 (LV)
± (2%–4%)
45%[ ax]
50%
-
-
–
–
Change Research /CNBC [ 123]
Sep 4–6
829 (LV)
–
46%
50%
-
-
4%[ ay]
–
TargetSmart [ 124]
Sep 3–6
835 (LV)
± 3.4%
44%
51%
-
-
3%
3%
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. [ 125]
Aug 26 – Sep 4
498 (LV)
± 4.3%
42%
44%
-
-
6%[ az]
7%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 126]
Aug 30 – Sep 3
1,053 (LV)
± 3.02%
43%
48%
1%
1%
1%[ am]
7%
Quinnipiac [ 127]
Aug 28 – Sep 1
1,235 (LV)
± 3%
44%
52%
-
-
1%[ r]
3%
ALG Research /Progressive Policy Institute [ 128] [ I]
Aug 26 – Sep 1
500 (LV)
–
44%
50%
-
-
–
–
Monmouth University [ 129]
Aug 28–31
400 (RV)
± 4.9%
45%
49%
2%
0%
1%[ ba]
4%
400 (LV)
46%[ bb]
49%
-
-
2%
3%
47%[ bc]
48%
-
-
2%
3%
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 130] [ E]
Aug 26–31
600 (LV)
–
45%
51%
-
-
–
4%
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Aug 1–31
3,531 (LV)
–
45%
53%
-
-
–
2%
Morning Consult [ 131]
Aug 21–30
2,158 (LV)
± (2%–4%)
45%
49%
-
-
–
–
Pulse Opinion Research /Rasmussen Reports [ 132]
Aug 25–27
1,000 (LV)
± 3%
48% [ bd]
48%
-
-
4%[ be]
–
GQR Research /Unite the Country PAC [ 133] [ J]
Aug 20–24
971 (LV)
± 4.4%
43%
52%
-
-
–
5%
Franklin & Marshall College [ 134]
Aug 17–24
681 (RV)
± 5.2%
42%[ c]
50%
-
-
3%[ bf]
7%
Change Research /CNBC [ 135]
Aug 21–23
984 (LV)
–
46%
49%
-
-
–
–
Global Strategy Group /Climate Power 2020 /League of Conservation Voters /Sierra Club [ 136] [ K]
Aug 13–19
801 (RV)
± 3.5%
42%[ l]
50%
2%
1%
–
5%
43%[ bg]
53%
-
-
–
4%
Redfield and Wilton Strategies [ 137]
Aug 16–17
1,006 (LV)
± 3.1%
41%
48%
1%
1%
1%[ am]
8%
Civiqs /Rust Belt Rising [ 138] [ F]
Aug 13–17
617 (RV)
–
44%
51%
-
-
3%[ ab]
1%
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 139]
Aug 11–17
416 (LV)
± 5.5%
45%
49%
-
-
3%[ bh]
3%
Morning Consult [ 131]
Aug 7–16
1,777 (LV)
± (2%–4%)
44%
50%
-
-
–
–
Emerson College [ 140]
Aug 8–10
843 (LV)
± 3.8%
47%[ bi]
53%
-
-
–
–
Change Research /CNBC [ 141]
Aug 7–9
456 (RV)
–
44%
48%
-
-
–
–
YouGov /CBS [ 142]
Aug 4–7
1,211 (LV)
± 3.7%
43%
49%
-
-
3%[ bj]
5%
OnMessage Inc. /Heritage Action [ 143] [ L]
Aug 2–4
400 (LV)
± 4.7%
46%
50%
-
-
–
4%
YouGov /University of Wisconsin-Madison [ 144]
Jul 27 – Aug 6
742 (RV)
± 4.9%
41%
50%
-
-
2%[ bk]
5%
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Jul 1–31
4,208 (LV)
–
48%
50%
-
-
–
2%
Change Research /CNBC [ 145] [2]
Jul 24–26
382 (LV)
–
46%
48%
-
-
–
–
Franklin & Marshall College [ 146]
Jul 20–26
667 (RV)
± 5.5%
41%
50%
-
-
2%[ q]
6%
Morning Consult [ 147]
Jul 17–26
2,092 (LV)
± 2.1%
42%
50%
-
-
–
–
Gravis Marketing [ 148] [3]
Jul 22–24
1,006 (RV)
± 3.1%
45%
48%
-
-
–
8%
Zogby Analytics [ 149]
Jul 21–23
809 (RV)
± 3.4%
43%
44%
4%
2%
-
8%
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 150] [ E]
Jul 17–22
600 (LV)
–
45%
51%
-
-
–
5%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 151]
Jul 19–21
1,016 (LV)
–
41%
48%
1%
0%
2%[ bl]
8%
Fox News [ 152]
Jul 18–20
793 (RV)
± 3.5%
39%
50%
-
-
5%[ bm]
6%
Pulse Opinion Research /Rasmussen Reports /American Greatness PAC [ 153] [ B]
Jul 15–16
750 (LV)
± 4%
46%
51%
-
-
2%[ q]
1%
Spry Strategies /American Principles Project [ 154] [ M]
Jul 11–16
700 (LV)
± 3.7%
48%
47%
-
-
–
5%
Monmouth University [ 155]
Jul 9–13
401 (RV)
± 4.9%
40%
53%
-
-
3%[ bn]
4%
401 (LV)
42%[ bb]
52%
-
-
3%
3%
44%[ bc]
51%
-
-
2%
3%
Change Research /CNBC [ 156]
Jul 10–12
743 (LV)
–
42%
50%
-
-
–
–
Trafalgar Group [ 157]
Jun 29 – Jul 2
1,062 (LV)
± 2.92%
43%
48%
-
-
6%[ bo]
3%
SurveyMonkey /Axios [ 37]
Jun 8–30
2,184 (LV)
–
48%
50%
-
-
–
2%
Change Research /CNBC [ 158]
Jun 26–28
760 (LV)[ ag]
–
44%
50%
-
-
–
–
Susquehanna Polling /Fox 43 [ 159]
Jun 15–23
715 (LV)
–
41%
46%
-
-
5%
8%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 160]
Jun 14–16
1,125 (LV)
± 2.92%
39%
49%
1%
1%
1%[ bp]
9%
Siena College /NYT Upshot [ 161]
Jun 8–16
651 (RV)
± 4.2%
40%
50%
-
-
3%[ bq]
6%
Change Research /CNBC [ 162]
Jun 12–14
491 (LV)[ ag]
–
46%
49%
-
-
3%[ br]
–
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 163] [ E]
Jun 8–11
600 (LV)
± 4.0%
42%
54%
-
-
–
4%
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
Jun 6–11
1,221 (A)
3.6%
46%
49%
-
-
–
5%
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
May 30 – Jun 2
2,045 (A)
2.4%
46%
49%
-
-
–
5%
Change Research /CNBC [ 164]
May 29–31
579 (LV)[ ag]
–
50%
46%
-
-
2%
2%
Morning Consult [ 147]
May 17–26
2,120 (LV)
–
44%[ ag]
48%
-
-
–
–
Redfield & Wilton Strategies [ 165]
May 10–14
963 (LV)
± 3.2%
39%
48%
-
-
2%[ bs]
11%
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 166] [ E]
May 9–13
600 (LV)
± 3.0%
51%
46%
-
-
–
4%
Harper Polling (R) [ 167]
Apr 21–26
644 (LV)
± 3.9%
43%
49%
-
-
–
8%
Public Policy Polling [ 168] [ N]
Apr 20–21
1,251 (RV)
–
44%
51%
-
-
–
5%
Fox News [ 169]
Apr 18–21
803 (RV)
± 3.5%
42%
50%
-
-
–
–
Ipsos [ 170]
Apr 15–20
578 (RV)
± 5.0%
40%
46%
-
-
–
–
Susquehanna Research /Fox 43 [ 171]
Apr 14–20
693 (LV)
–
42%
48%
-
-
–
–
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 172] [ E]
Apr 16–18
600 (RV)
± 3.0%
47%
47%
-
-
–
6%
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
Apr 4–8
1,912 (A)
2.5%
47%
47%
-
-
–
6%
Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes [ 173]
Mar 17–25
973 (RV)
± 3.9%
47%
45%
-
-
–
9%
Change Research [ 174]
Mar 21–23
510 (LV)
–
50%
47%
-
-
–
4%
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 175] [ E]
Mar 19–21
600 (RV)
–
47%
45%
-
-
–
–
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
Mar 14–18
1,589 (A)
2.7%
48%
46%
-
-
–
6%
YouGov /Yahoo News [ 176]
Mar 6–8
725 (RV)
–
40%
46%
-
-
5%[ bt]
8%
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 177]
Mar 5–7
533 (RV)
± 5.3%
45%
44%
-
-
–
–
Civiqs /Dan Hopkins [ 72]
Feb 27 – Mar 3
2,462 (A)
2.2%
48%
46%
-
-
–
7%
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 178]
Feb 12–20
424 (RV)
± 5.5%
47%
47%
-
-
2%
4%
YouGov [ 179]
Feb 11–20
1,171 (RV)
± 4.0%
45%
46%
-
-
–
–
Quinnipiac University [ 180]
Feb 12–18
849 (RV)
± 3.4%
42%
50%
-
-
6%[ bu]
3%
Expedition Strategies /Progressive Policies Institute [ 181]
Feb 6–18
500 (RV)
–
42%
47%
-
-
–
11%
2017–2019 polls
Former candidates
Donald Trump vs. Michael Bloomberg
Donald Trump vs. Pete Buttigieg
Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris
Poll source
Date(s) administered
Sample size[ b]
Marginof error
Donald Trump (R)
Kamala Harris (D)
Other
Undecided
Quinnipiac University [ 186]
May 9–14, 2019
978 (RV)
± 4.2%
45%
45%
3%
5%
Emerson College [ 188]
Mar 26–28, 2019
808 (RV)
± 3.4%
49%
51%
–
–
Donald Trump vs. Amy Klobuchar
Donald Trump vs. Beto O'Rourke
Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders
Poll source
Date(s) administered
Sample size[ b]
Marginof error
Donald Trump (R)
Bernie Sanders (D)
Other
Undecided
Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes [ 173]
Mar 17–25, 2020
973 (RV)
± 3.9%
48%
42%
–
10%
Hodas & Associates /Restoration PAC [ 175] [ E]
Mar 19–21, 2020
600 (RV)
–
49%
43%
–
–
YouGov /Yahoo News [ 176]
Mar 6–8, 2020
725 (RV)
–
41%
43%
6%[ ca]
10%
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 177]
Mar 5–7, 2020
533 (RV)
± 5.3 %
46%
42%
–
–
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 178]
Feb 12–20, 2020
424 (RV)
± 5.5 %
46%
49%
3%
3%
YouGov [ 179]
Feb 11–20, 2020
1,171 (RV)
±4.0%
45%
47%
–
–
Quinnipiac University [ 180]
Feb 12–18, 2020
849 (RV)
±3.4%
44%
48%
5%[ cb]
1%
Expedition Strategies /Progressive Policies Institute [ 181]
Feb 6–18, 2020
500 (RV)
–
43%
45%
–
12%
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 177]
Dec 3–5, 2019
598 (LV)
± 4.3%
48%
37%
8%[ cc]
6%[ t]
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 190]
Nov 4–9, 2019
410 (RV)
± 6.0%
45%
50%
4%
1%
NYT Upshot /Siena College [ 191]
Oct 13–25, 2019
661 (LV)
± 4.4%
45%
44%
–
–
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 184]
Sep 7–9, 2019
527 (LV)
± 4.2%
42%
44%
14%
–
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 185]
Jun 11–13, 2019
565 (LV)
± 4.2%
44%
41%
15%
–
Quinnipiac University [ 186]
May 9–14, 2019
978 (RV)
± 4.2%
43%
50%
2%
3%
Tulchin Research (D) [ 192] [ O]
Apr 14–18, 2019
400 (LV)
± 4.9%
43%
51%
–
–
Emerson College [ 188]
Mar 26–28, 2019
808 (RV)
± 3.4%
45%
55%
–
–
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 189]
Mar 19–21, 2019
632 (LV)
± 4.0%
44%
44%
8%
–
Donald Trump vs. Elizabeth Warren
Poll source
Date(s) administered
Sample size[ b]
Marginof error
Donald Trump (R)
Elizabeth Warren (D)
Other
Undecided
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 178]
Feb 12–20, 2020
424 (RV)
± 5.5 %
47%
47%
4%
3%
YouGov [ 179]
Feb 11–20, 2020
1,171 (RV)
±4.0%
45%
45%
–
–
Quinnipiac University [ 180]
Feb 12–18, 2020
849 (RV)
±3.4%
44%
47%
8%[ by]
2%
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 177]
Dec 3–5, 2019
598 (LV)
± 4.3%
47%
40%
8%[ cc]
5%[ t]
Muhlenberg College /Morning Call [ 193]
Nov 4–9, 2019
410 (RV)
± 6.0%
45%
50%
4%
1%
NYT Upshot /Siena College [ 191]
Oct 13–25, 2019
661 (LV)
± 4.4%
46%
44%
–
–
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 184]
Sep 7–9, 2019
527 (LV)
± 4.2%
41%
43%
16%
–
Firehouse Strategies /Øptimus [ 185]
Jun 11–13, 2019
565 (LV)
± 4.2%
45%
34%
21%
–
Quinnipiac University [ 186]
May 9–14, 2019
978 (RV)
± 4.2%
44%
47%
3%
4%
Emerson College [ 188]
Mar 26–28, 2019
808 (RV)
± 3.4%
48%
52%
–
–
Zogby Analytics [ 194]
Aug 17–23, 2017
813 (LV)
± 3.4%
38%
46%
–
16%
Hypothetical polling
Donald Trump vs. Generic Democrat
Donald Trump vs. Generic Opponent
Electoral slates
These slates of electors were nominated by each party in order to vote in the Electoral College should their candidates win the state:[ 200]
Results
9,098,998[ 201] residents registered to vote by the voter registration deadline on October 15, which had been extended from its original date on October 13 by court order.
By county
County[ 204]
Joe Biden Democratic
Donald Trump Republican
Jo Jorgensen Libertarian
Various candidates Other parties
Margin
Total votes cast
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
Adams
18,254
32.13%
37,567
66.13%
814
1.43%
174
0.31%
−19,313
−34.00%
56,809
Allegheny
430,759
59.43%
282,913
39.03%
8,361
1.15%
2,767
0.38%
147,846
20.40%
724,800
Armstrong
8,457
23.22%
27,489
75.47%
424
1.16%
56
0.15%
−19,032
−52.25%
36,426
Beaver
38,122
40.38%
54,759
58.01%
1,241
1.31%
275
0.29%
−16,637
−17.63%
94,397
Bedford
4,367
15.82%
23,025
83.39%
182
0.66%
36
0.13%
−18,658
−67.57%
27,610
Berks
93,116
45.08%
109,926
53.22%
2,924
1.42%
587
0.28%
−16,810
−8.14%
206,553
Blair
17,636
27.67%
45,306
71.07%
653
1.02%
153
0.24%
−27,670
−43.40%
63,748
Bradford
8,046
26.61%
21,600
71.45%
513
1.70%
73
0.24%
−13,554
−44.84%
30,232
Bucks
204,712
51.53%
187,367
47.16%
4,155
1.05%
1,057
0.27%
17,345
4.37%
397,291
Butler
37,508
33.00%
74,359
65.42%
1,438
1.27%
358
0.31%
−36,851
−32.42%
113,663
Cambria
21,730
30.71%
48,085
67.96%
759
1.07%
177
0.25%
−26,355
−37.25%
70,751
Cameron
634
25.98%
1,771
72.58%
29
1.19%
6
0.25%
−1,137
−46.60%
2,440
Carbon
11,212
33.28%
21,984
65.26%
433
1.29%
60
0.18%
−10,772
−31.98%
33,689
Centre
40,055
51.42%
36,372
46.70%
1,066
1.37%
398
0.51%
3,683
4.72%
77,891
Chester
182,372
57.76%
128,565
40.72%
3,565
1.13%
1,251
0.40%
53,807
17.04%
315,753
Clarion
4,678
23.96%
14,578
74.67%
237
1.21%
31
0.16%
−9,900
−50.71%
19,524
Clearfield
9,673
24.49%
29,203
73.94%
546
1.38%
74
0.19%
−19,530
−49.45%
39,496
Clinton
5,502
31.15%
11,902
67.39%
221
1.25%
36
0.20%
−6,400
−36.24%
17,661
Columbia
10,532
33.67%
20,098
64.25%
541
1.73%
109
0.35%
−9,566
−30.58%
31,280
Crawford
12,924
30.69%
28,561
67.82%
521
1.24%
108
0.26%
−15,637
−37.13%
42,114
Cumberland
62,245
43.78%
77,212
54.30%
2,138
1.50%
592
0.42%
−14,967
−10.52%
142,187
Dauphin
78,983
53.40%
66,408
44.90%
1,977
1.34%
533
0.36%
12,575
8.50%
147,901
Delaware
206,709
62.75%
118,639
36.02%
2,981
0.90%
1,075
0.33%
88,070
26.73%
329,404
Elk
4,522
26.68%
12,140
71.64%
244
1.44%
40
0.24%
−7,618
−44.96%
16,946
Erie
68,286
49.66%
66,869
48.63%
1,928
1.40%
411
0.30%
1,417
1.03%
137,494
Fayette
20,469
32.87%
41,251
66.24%
468
0.75%
91
0.15%
−20,782
−33.37%
62,279
Forest
728
27.43%
1,882
70.91%
36
1.36%
8
0.30%
−1,154
−43.48%
2,654
Franklin
22,422
27.67%
57,245
70.65%
1,116
1.38%
242
0.30%
−34,823
−42.98%
81,025
Fulton
1,085
13.58%
6,824
85.41%
68
0.85%
13
0.26%
−5,739
−71.83%
7,990
Greene
4,911
27.75%
12,579
71.08%
179
1.01%
28
0.16%
−7,668
−43.33%
17,697
Huntingdon
5,445
23.84%
17,061
74.69%
286
1.25%
51
0.22%
−11,616
−50.85%
22,843
Indiana
12,634
30.60%
28,089
68.03%
475
1.15%
91
0.22%
−15,455
−37.43%
41,289
Jefferson
4,529
19.80%
17,964
78.54%
337
1.47%
42
0.18%
−13,435
−58.74%
22,872
Juniata
2,253
18.66%
9,649
79.93%
141
1.17%
29
0.24%
−7,396
−61.27%
12,072
Lackawanna
61,991
53.58%
52,334
45.23%
1,085
0.94%
285
0.25%
9,657
8.35%
115,695
Lancaster
115,847
41.17%
160,209
56.94%
4,183
1.49%
1,136
0.40%
−44,362
−15.77%
281,375
Lawrence
15,978
34.59%
29,597
64.08%
501
1.08%
111
0.24%
−13,619
−29.49%
46,187
Lebanon
23,932
33.30%
46,731
65.03%
989
1.38%
206
0.29%
−22,799
−31.73%
71,858
Lehigh
98,498
53.05%
84,418
45.47%
2,176
1.17%
563
0.30%
14,080
7.58%
185,655
Luzerne
64,873
42.26%
86,929
56.63%
1,519
0.99%
178
0.12%
−22,056
−14.37%
153,499
Lycoming
16,971
28.57%
41,462
69.80%
821
1.38%
143
0.24%
−24,491
−41.23%
59,397
McKean
5,098
26.13%
14,083
72.18%
285
1.46%
44
0.23%
−8,985
−46.05%
19,510
Mercer
21,067
36.25%
36,143
62.19%
744
1.28%
163
0.28%
−15,076
−25.94%
58,117
Mifflin
4,603
21.36%
16,670
77.37%
229
1.06%
45
0.21%
−12,067
−56.01%
21,547
Monroe
44,060
52.43%
38,726
46.08%
1,043
1.24%
205
0.24%
5,334
6.35%
84,034
Montgomery
319,511
62.41%
185,460
36.23%
5,186
1.01%
1,763
0.35%
134,051
26.18%
511,920
Montour
3,771
38.41%
5,844
59.53%
156
1.59%
46
0.47%
−2,073
−21.12%
9,817
Northampton
85,087
49.64%
83,854
48.92%
2,001
1.17%
457
0.27%
1,233
0.72%
171,399
Northumberland
12,703
29.94%
28,975
68.28%
657
1.55%
100
0.24%
−16,272
−38.34%
42,435
Perry
5,950
24.06%
18,293
73.98%
409
1.65%
76
0.31%
−12,343
−49.92%
24,728
Philadelphia
604,175
81.21%
132,870
17.86%
4,854
0.65%
2,067
0.28%
471,305
63.35%
743,966
Pike
13,052
40.02%
19,241
58.99%
323
0.99%
0
0.00%
−6,189
−18.97%
32,616
Potter
1,726
19.00%
7,239
79.68%
99
1.09%
21
0.23%
−5,513
−60.68%
9,085
Schuylkill
20,727
29.29%
48,871
69.07%
1,005
1.42%
152
0.21%
−28,144
−39.78%
70,755
Snyder
4,910
25.60%
13,983
72.90%
247
1.29%
41
0.21%
−9,073
−47.30%
19,181
Somerset
8,654
21.30%
31,466
77.45%
423
1.04%
83
0.20%
−22,812
−56.15%
40,626
Sullivan
921
25.60%
2,619
72.79%
55
1.53%
3
0.08%
−1,698
−47.19%
3,598
Susquehanna
6,236
28.59%
15,207
69.72%
309
1.42%
61
0.28%
−8,971
−41.13%
21,813
Tioga
4,955
23.45%
15,742
74.51%
378
1.79%
51
0.24%
−10,787
−51.06%
21,126
Union
7,475
37.02%
12,356
61.19%
284
1.41%
77
0.38%
−4,881
−24.17%
20,192
Venango
7,585
28.51%
18,569
69.81%
374
1.41%
73
0.27%
−10,984
−41.30%
26,601
Warren
6,066
29.37%
14,237
68.92%
347
1.68%
7
0.03%
−8,171
−39.55%
20,657
Washington
45,088
37.97%
72,080
60.70%
1,310
1.10%
278
0.23%
−26,992
−22.73%
118,756
Wayne
9,191
32.65%
18,637
66.21%
261
0.93%
58
0.21%
−9,446
−33.56%
28,147
Westmoreland
72,192
35.16%
130,299
63.46%
2,353
1.15%
486
0.24%
−58,107
−28.30%
205,330
Wyoming
4,704
31.57%
9,936
66.68%
218
1.46%
42
0.28%
−5,232
−35.11%
14,900
York
88,114
36.85%
146,733
61.36%
3,624
1.52%
675
0.28%
−58,619
−24.51%
239,146
Totals
3,461,221
49.87%
3,379,055
48.69%
79,445
1.14%
20,728
0.30%
82,166
1.18%
6,940,449
Swing by county
Democratic — +7.5–10%
Democratic — +5–7.5%
Democratic — +2.5–5%
Democratic — +0–2.5%
Republican — +0–2.5%
Republican — +2.5–5%
Republican — +5–7.5%
Trend relative to the state by county
Democratic — +7.5–10%
Democratic — +5–7.5%
Democratic — +2.5–5%
Democratic — +0–2.5%
Republican — +0–2.5%
Republican — +2.5–5%
Republican — +5–7.5%
County flips
Democratic
Hold
Gain from Republican
Republican
Hold
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
By congressional district
Biden and Trump both won half of the 18 congressional districts in Pennsylvania,[ 205] including each winning one held by the opposite party.
Analysis
Throughout the year, Pennsylvania was regarded as the most important (or likely tipping-point ) state in the entire election; Pennsylvania had 20 electoral votes, and it was one of the closest states of the 2016 presidential election. Both candidates aggressively played for the state; Trump needed the state as it represented his narrow path to re-election, while Biden needed the state to rebuild the blue wall , which Trump had broken in 2016 by carrying the northern industrial states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[ 206]
Historically, Pennsylvania has usually been a competitive state. During the Second Party System from 1828 to 1852, it voted for the winner of every election. From the Civil War on, it has generally had a partisan lean; during the Third and Fourth Party Systems , Pennsylvania was a classic Yankee Republican state. When Franklin Roosevelt carried it in 1936, he became the first Democrat in eighty years to do so. Between 1936 and 1988, neither major party carried Pennsylvania for more than three straight presidential elections, although between 1952 and 1988, it voted Democratic in every close election (1960, 1968, 1976), and consistently voted more Democratic than the nation. Starting in 1992, Pennsylvania became part of the blue wall—the group of states that voted Democratic for six straight elections from 1992 through 2012. In 2016, it was one of three blue wall states that Trump won on his way to an upset victory.
State Republicans sought to require that only mail-in ballots received by Election Day be counted. The Commonwealth's Supreme Court rejected their demands, deciding that, due to probable delays due to the ongoing coronavirus and U.S. Postal Service crisis , ballots received up to three days after Election Day would also be counted.[ 207] Republicans then appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court . Supreme Court justices produced a 4–4 tie (as the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg 's seat remained vacant when the ruling was issued), with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the three liberal justices, allowing the state supreme court decision to stand.[ 207]
At 1.17%, Biden's winning margin percentage in Pennsylvania was the smallest ever for a Democratic presidential candidate who won Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania remained redder than the country in 2020 even as Biden won it, by about 3.3%. As in Michigan and Wisconsin , Biden ran behind Barack Obama 's performances in 2008 and 2012, though he received more votes total in the state this cycle due to record-breaking turnout. Biden's margin of victory was also less than Al Gore's 4.2% margin of victory in 2000 and John Kerry's 2.5% margin of victory in 2004 .
As for Trump, he easily set the record for total number of votes for a Republican candidate in Pennsylvania history (as with Biden, largely due to record-breaking turnout). With 48.84% of the vote, he did slightly outpace both his own vote share in 2016 (48.18%) and George W. Bush 's in 2004 (48.42%), the latter of which had previously stood as the highest Republican vote share in the state since 1988.
Biden's strongest base of support was the Philadelphia metro area . In the city of Philadelphia itself, Biden won by 63.4%, a weaker win than Hillary Clinton's 66.9% margin in the city in 2016, but still better than Kerry's 61.1% margin in 2004 or Gore's 62.0% margin in 2000.[ 208] Donald Trump improved his vote share in Philadelphia by 2.5%,[ 209] and, as of the counting on November 8, held a majority of the vote in the 26th, 58th, and 66th wards. However, Biden improved on Hillary Clinton dramatically in the Main Line counties of Montgomery and Chester , as well as, to a lesser extent, Delaware , increasing the Democratic vote share in these counties by 4.2%, 5.9%, and 3.5%, respectively, and winning them all by double digits. Before 1992, all three had been Republican strongholds in the state, and Chester had been considered a swing county as recently as 2012, when Romney narrowly carried it, but all three have drifted towards the Democratic column, as they tend to be socially liberal.[ 210]
Biden also performed strongly in Pennsylvania's other urban, suburban, and exurban areas. Crucially, he carried Allegheny County (Pittsburgh ) by 20.4%, the widest margin any nominee had won the county by since 1992.[ 211] Centre and Dauphin both remained in the Democratic column; in the past, these counties voted Republican, though Centre County is home to Pennsylvania State University , while Dauphin County, home of Harrisburg , has followed the trend of urban areas becoming more Democratic. Biden also narrowly reclaimed two counties anchored by industrial cities which had long voted Democratic before Trump flipped them in 2016, Northampton (Bethlehem and Easton ) and Erie (Erie ), and improved on Hillary Clinton's margin in his birth county of Lackawanna County (Scranton ), a county Hillary Clinton had barely kept in the Democratic column in 2016. In suburban Cumberland County , adjacent to Harrisburg , Biden shaved Trump's margin from 17.8% to 10.5%.[ 212] Northampton and Erie were the only counties to flip from one party to the other; Northampton has voted for the winner of the state in every election from 1952 on.
Trump maintained much of his momentum throughout rural and industrial Pennsylvania from four years earlier, with convincing victories in counties that were once competitive or even Democratic-leaning. He kept Luzerne County (Wilkes-Barre ), which had voted Democratic six elections in a row before 2016 (and which had voted with the winner of the state from 1936 through 2016), in his column, although his margin in it was cut from 19.3% to 14.3%. Trump also won the former Democratic stronghold of Westmoreland County , although his margin in this county, crucial to his win in 2016,[ 213] declined.[ 214] Other previously competitive counties that Trump performed well in included Berks and Cambria , both of which voted for Obama in 2008. Trump further ran up the score in other conservative exurban[ 215] counties, most notably in Lancaster and Lebanon counties, though his margin shrank somewhat in both.
Trump won whites in the state by 15 points, although like in the rest of the country, there was a clear disparity between college-educated and non-college-educated whites. Biden won whites with a college degree by 9 points, while Trump excelled with whites without a college degree, winning this group by 32 points. Additionally, there was a gender disparity with the white vote; Trump won white men by 15 points, but only carried white women by 3 points. Finally, there was an age gap; Biden won young voters by double-digit margins, whereas Trump performed strongly with middle-aged voters; senior citizens were more even, breaking slightly for Trump.[ 216] Within minority blocs, Biden fared well, as he won black voters by 87 points, and won Latinos by 42 points. Three other critical voting blocs broke for Biden this cycle; he won independent voters by 8 points, moderates by 17 points, and first-time voters by 23 points.[ 216]
Voter demographics
Edison Research exit poll
Demographic subgroup
Biden
Trump
No Answer
% of Voters
Party
Democrat
92
7
N/A
40
Republican
8
91
N/A
41
Independent
52
44
N/A
19
Gender
Men
44
55
1
47
Women
55
44
1
53
Race
White
42
57
1
81
Black
92
7
1
11
Latino
69
27
4
5
Asian
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Gender by race/ethnicity
White men
37
62
1
38
White women
47
52
1
43
Black men
89
10
1
5
Black women
94
4
2
6
Latino men (of any race)
N/A
N/A
1
3
Latino women (of any race)
83
15
2
3
All other races
62
33
5
2
Age
18–24 years old
59
37
3
7
25–29 years old
67
31
2
6
30–39 years old
61
37
2
16
40–49 years old
52
46
2
13
50–64 years old
41
59
N/A
31
65 and older
46
53
1
28
Sexual orientation
LGBT
64
34
2
7
Heterosexual
47
52
1
93
First time voter
First time voter
52
45
3
13
Everyone else
48
52
N/A
87
Education
High school or less
35
64
1
16
Some college education
49
49
2
26
Associate degree
46
53
1
17
Bachelor's degree
54
45
1
26
Advanced degree
63
36
1
14
Education by race/ethnicity
White college graduates
54
45
1
26
White no college degree
20
79
1
35
Non-white college graduates
83
16
1
14
Non-white no college degree
80
19
1
25
Income
Under $30,000
60
37
3
15
$30,000–49,999
53
45
3
19
$50,000–99,999
53
46
1
23
$100,000–199,999
51
48
1
23
Over $200,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
Abortion should be
Legal in all cases
84
15
1
25
Legal in most cases
67
32
1
30
Illegal in most cases
17
83
1
27
Illegal in all cases
12
85
3
13
Region
Northeast
46
53
1
17
Philly Suburbs
81
18
1
11
Central
38
61
1
22
West
43
56
1
28
Source: CNN [ 217]
Aftermath
On November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , Kathy Boockvar , certified the results, and Governor Tom Wolf , in accordance with the law, signed the certificate of ascertainment for the Biden/Harris slate of electors for Biden and Harris and sent it to the Archivist of the United States .[ 218] [ 219]
On November 25, 2020, the Pennsylvania Senate Majority (Republican) Policy committee held a public hearing regarding the counting of ballots in this election.[ 220] Trump planned to attend the meeting but he canceled the trip.[ 221]
Also, on November 25, after a group of Republican congressmen had filed a lawsuit to stop certification on Sunday November 22, Judge Patricia McCullough (R) ruled to halt further state certifications pending a hearing.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court then ruled Saturday night on November 28 to unanimously overturn Judge Patricia McCullough's ruling to halt certification because no fraud was alleged and both parties could have objected throughout the year, but did not.[ 222]
On December 31, 2020, Pennsylvania Congressman Dan Meuser (PA-9), Congressman Glenn 'GT' Thompson (PA-15), Congressman Mike Kelly (PA-16), Congressman Scott Perry (PA-10), Congressman Lloyd Smucker (PA-11), Congressman Guy Reschenthaler (PA-14), Congressman John Joyce (PA-13), and Congressman Fred Keller (PA-12) released a statement that summarized their belief that the Pennsylvania state legislature had taken unlawful actions regarding the 2020 election process which, in their opinion, resulted in a "highly questionable and inaccurate vote total".[ 223]
Official audits and recounts
As required by state law, all counties completed a post-election sample audit.[ 224] With the exception of three counties, Pennsylvania's counties also participated in a voluntary risk-limiting audit pilot.[ 225] Both types of audits confirmed the certified results.
Lycoming County completed a hand recount and did not find any major discrepancy.[ 226]
Butler County also completed a hand recount in two precincts and found no inaccuracies.[ 227]
Objection
On January 6, 2021, as Congress certified the Electoral College results confirming President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris as the winners, there was an objection to Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes, brought forward by U.S. Representative Scott Perry of Pennsylvania's 10th congressional district and officially signed onto by U.S. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri .[ 228] The objection failed 7–92 in the Senate, and 138–282 in the House.[ 229]
See also
Notes
Partisan clients
^ Compete Everywhere primarily supports Democratic candidates
^ a b c d The Center for American Greatness is a pro-Trump organization
^ Climate Power 2020 was created by the League of Conservation Voters, which endorsed Biden prior to the sampling period
^ The American Bridge PAC exclusively supports Democratic candidates
^ a b c d e f g h i The Restoration PAC is a 501 non-profit which supports Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign
^ a b c Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party
^ The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
^ CPEC campaigns exclusively for Democratic candidates
^ The Progressive Policy Institute endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
^ Unite the Country PAC endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
^ The League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
^ Heritage Action is the sister organisation of the Heritage Foundation, which exclusively endorses Republican candidates
^ This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.
^ Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organisation
^ Poll sponsored by the Sanders campaign
Additional candidates
^ Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
^ a b c d e f g h i j k Key: A – all adults RV – registered voters LV – likely voters V – unclear
^ a b c d e With voters who lean towards a given candidate
^ Would not vote with 0%
^ Overlapping sample with the previous SurveyMonkey/Axios poll, but more information available regarding sample size
^ "Some other candidate" with 1%
^ a b c d e f g h "Someone else" with 2%
^ a b "Other candidate" and "No one" with 0%
^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout
^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout
^ "Other candidate or write-in" with 0%
^ a b c d e f g Standard VI response
^ West (B) with 2%; "Some other candidate" and would not vote with 0%
^ a b c d If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
^ a b c "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
^ Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention, indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above
^ a b c d "Some other candidate" with 2%
^ a b c d e f g h "Someone else" with 1%
^ a b c "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
^ a b c d e f g Includes "Refused"
^ "Not sure/Someone else/Undecided" with 2%
^ "None of these" and "Other" with 0%; would not vote with no voters
^ "Neither/other" with 4%
^ a b Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
^ a b Results generated with high Republican turnout model
^ "Some other candidate" with 1%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%
^ "Refused" with 1%; "Some other candidate" with 0%
^ a b c "Someone else" with 3%
^ Includes Undecided
^ "Other" with 1%; "None of these" with 0%
^ "Neither/other" with 2%
^ a b "Other" with 1%; would not vote with no voters
^ a b c d e f g Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight
^ "Refused" with 3%; "Others" with 1%
^ "Some other candidate" with 2%; West (B) with 1%; would not vote with 0%
^ "Some other candidate" and would not vote with 1%; West (B) with 0%
^ "Some other candidate" with 1%; would not vote with 0%
^ "Another candidate" with 0%
^ a b c d "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
^ a b "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
^ "Someone else/third party" with 2%
^ "Neither" and "Other" with 0%; would not vote with no voters
^ "Other" with 1%; "Prefer not to answer" with 0%
^ "Other" and would not vote with 1%
^ "Another candidate" with 1%
^ "Third party candidate" with 1%
^ "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 0%
^ "Neither candidate or other candidate" with 3%
^ Would not vote with 1%
^ Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size
^ "Other/not sure" with 4%
^ "Other" and "Refused" with 3%
^ "No one" with 1%; "Other candidate" with no voters
^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
^ a b With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
^ Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight; with voters who lean towards a given candidate
^ "Some other candidate" with 4%
^ "Some other candidate" with 3%
^ If only Biden and Trump were candidates
^ "Neither/other" with 3%
^ Including voters who lean towards a given candidate
^ "Someone else/third party" with 3%
^ "Other" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
^ West (B) and "Another Third Party/Write-In" with 1%
^ "Other" with 4%; would not vote with 1%
^ "Another candidate" with 3%; "No one" with 0%
^ "Other party candidate" with 6%
^ "other" with 1%
^ "Another candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 1%
^ "Libertarian Party candidate/Green Party candidate" with 3%
^ "Third party/write-in" with 2%
^ "Other" with 2%; would not vote with 3%
^ a b "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 5%
^ A third party candidate with 6%; will not vote with 2%
^ "Someone else" with 2%; would not vote with 4%
^ A third party candidate with 6%; will not vote with 3%
^ a b "Someone else" with 2%; would not vote with 6%
^ A third party candidate with 4%; will not vote with 3%
^ "Other" with 4%; would not vote with 2%
^ "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 4%
^ a b A third party candidate with 5%; will not vote with 3%
^ a b Figures for each candidate in this poll include undecided voters who were reported to lean towards that candidate at the time of polling.
^ "It depends on who the Democrats nominate" with 1.4%; "unsure" with 0.7%
^ 61% "time for a change" as opposed to "Trump has done a good enough job to deserve re-election"
References
^ "Election Stats" . Archived from the original on December 9, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2020 .
^ "Pennsylvania Election Results 2020" . The New York Times . November 3, 2020. Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2020 .
^ Kelly, Ben (August 13, 2018). "US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?" . The Independent . Archived from the original on August 2, 2018. Retrieved January 3, 2019 .
^ "Distribution of Electoral Votes" . National Archives and Records Administration . Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019 .
^ Prokop, Andrew (November 6, 2020). "Why Decision Desk called Pennsylvania, and the presidential race, for Joe Biden" . Vox . Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020 .
^ Hall, Richard (November 8, 2020). "I saw Donald Trump's presidency come crashing down at Four Seasons Total Landscaping" . The Independent . Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020 . "Who was it called by?", "All of them," came the response.
^ Stephen Collinson and Maeve Reston (November 7, 2020). "Biden wins Pennsylvania, becoming the 46th president of the United States" . CNN . Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved November 7, 2020 .
^ NBC. "Pennsylvania Presidential Election Results 2020" . NBC News . Archived from the original on September 8, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022 .
^ a b Leip, Dave. "Dave Leip's Atlas of Presidential Elections" . Archived from the original on February 22, 2011. Retrieved September 7, 2022 .
^ Park, Alice; Smart, Charlie; Taylor, Rumsey; Watkins, Miles (March 30, 2021). "An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2020 Election" . New York Times . Archived from the original on February 2, 2021. Retrieved September 7, 2020 .
^ Thompson, Steve; Nirappil, Fenit (February 6, 2019). "D.C. is slated to vote last in 2020 Democratic primaries. That might change" . The Washington Post . Archived from the original on March 10, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2019 .
^ "Pennsylvania just postponed its primary due to coronavirus. Here's what it means for voters and 2020 campaigns" . The Philadelphia Inquirer . March 27, 2020. Archived from the original on May 14, 2020. Retrieved March 29, 2020 .
^ "Do Republicans oppose vote by mail? In Pennsylvania, it's not that simple" . The Philadelphia Inquirer . April 13, 2020. Archived from the original on April 14, 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2020 .
^ "Pennsylvania Presidential Republican Primary Election Results" . The New York Times . June 2, 2020. Archived from the original on June 2, 2020. Retrieved June 3, 2020 .
^ a b "Pennsylvania Republican Delegation 2020" . The Green Papers. Archived from the original on June 3, 2020. Retrieved June 3, 2020 .
^ "2020 Presidential Primary Official Returns" . Pennsylvania Department of State. Retrieved October 14, 2020 .
^ "2020 Primary Elections: Pennsylvania results" . NBC . July 17, 2020. Retrieved August 11, 2020 .
^ "Hawkins Wins PA Presidential Caucus" . Green Party of Pennsylvania . May 4, 2020. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved September 11, 2020 .
^ "2020 POTUS Race ratings" (PDF) . The Cook Political Report . Archived from the original on March 23, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019 .
^ "POTUS Ratings | Inside Elections" . insideelections.com . Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019 .
^ "Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » 2020 President" . crystalball.centerforpolitics.org . Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019 .
^ "2020 Election Forecast" . Politico . November 19, 2019. Archived from the original on June 14, 2020. Retrieved April 8, 2020 .
^ "Battle for White House" . RCP . April 19, 2019. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved April 27, 2020 .
^ 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions Archived April 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine , Niskanen Center , March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020.
^ David Chalian; Terence Burlij (June 11, 2020). "Road to 270: CNN's debut Electoral College map for 2020" . CNN . Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 16, 2020 .
^ "Forecasting the US elections" . The Economist . Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2020 .
^ "2020 Election Battleground Tracker" . CBS News . July 12, 2020. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020 .
^ "2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map" . 270 to Win . Archived from the original on April 15, 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2020 .
^ "ABC News Race Ratings" . ABC News . July 24, 2020. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020 .
^ Montanaro, Domenico (August 3, 2020). "2020 Electoral Map Ratings: Trump Slides, Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes" . NPR.org . Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020 .
^ "Biden dominates the electoral map, but here's how the race could tighten" . NBC News . August 6, 2020. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020 .
^ "2020 Election Forecast" . FiveThirtyEight . August 12, 2020. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020 .
^ 270 to Win
^ Real Clear Politics
^ FiveThirtyEight
^ Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc.
^ a b c d e f SurveyMonkey/Axios
^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
^ Research Co.
^ AYTM/Aspiration
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Marist College/NBC
^ Monmouth University
^ Swayable Archived November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Data for Progress
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Trafalgar
^ Frederick Polls/Compete Everywhere
^ Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness [permanent dead link ]
^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
^ a b Morning Consult
^ Emerson College
^ AtlasIntel
^ Targoz Market Research/PollSmart
^ Public Policy Polling/American Bridge PAC
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Harvard-Harris/The Hill
^ ABC/Washington Post
^ a b Muhlenberg College/Morning Call
^ RMG Research/PoliticalIQ Archived October 29, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Quinnipiac University
^ Swayable
^ Civiqs/Daily Kos
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness
^ Trafalgar Group
^ "Wick Surveys" . Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved November 3, 2020 .
^ Franklin & Marshall College
^ Univision/University of Houston/Latino Decisions/North Star Opinion Research
^ Gravis Marketing
^ Public Policy Polling/American Bridge PAC
^ a b c d e f Civiqs/Dan Hopkins
^ YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison
^ Citizen Data
^ CNN/SSRS [permanent dead link ]
^ a b Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Archived November 3, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Fox News
^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
^ Quinnipiac University
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Suffolk University/USA Today
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC
^ HarrisX/The Hill
^ Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness Archived October 17, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Trafalgar Group
^ RMG Research/PoliticalIQ Archived October 14, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Morning Consult
^ Whitman Insight Strategies
^ Baldwin Wallace University
^ YouGov/CCES Archived November 1, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Emerson College
^ Quinnipiac University
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Monmouth University
^ YouGov/CBS
^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
^ ABC News/Washington Post
^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
^ TIPP/The Federalist
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Fox News
^ Baldwin Wallace University
^ Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC
^ YouGov/UW-Madison Elections Research Center/Wisconsin State Journal
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Franklin & Marshall College
^ Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign [permanent dead link ]
^ CPEC
^ Trafalgar Group (R)
^ Ipsos/Reuters
^ Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Climate Nexus
^ Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group/AARP
^ Marist College/NBC News
^ Morning Consult
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ TargetSmart Archived October 4, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc.
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Quinnipiac Archived September 3, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ ALG Research/Progressive Policy Institute
^ Monmouth University
^ Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ a b Morning Consult
^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports
^ GQR Research/Unite the Country PAC
^ Franklin & Marshall College
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ "Global Strategy Group/Climate Power 2020 /League of Conservation Voters/Sierra Club" (PDF) . Archived from the original (PDF) on September 1, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2020 .
^ Redfield and Wilton Strategies
^ Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising
^ a b Muhlenberg College/Morning Call
^ Emerson College
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ YouGov/CBS
^ OnMessage Inc./Heritage Action
^ YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Franklin & Marshall College
^ a b Morning Consult
^ Gravis Marketing
^ Zogby Analytics
^ Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Fox News
^ Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports/American Greatness PAC Archived July 31, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Spry Strategies/American Principles Project
^ Monmouth University
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Trafalgar Group
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Susquehanna Polling/Fox 43
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ Change Research/CNBC
^ Redfield & Wilton Strategies
^ Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ Harper Polling (R) Archived May 1, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ Public Policy Polling
^ Fox News
^ Ipsos
^ Susquehanna Research/Fox 43
^ Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ a b Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes
^ Change Research
^ a b Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC
^ a b YouGov/Yahoo News
^ a b c d e f g Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Archived December 9, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b c d e f g Muhlenberg College/Morning Call
^ a b c d e YouGov
^ a b c d e f Quinnipiac University Archived May 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b c d e Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute
^ Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Archived November 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ Siena College/NYT Upshot
^ a b c Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Archived September 12, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b c d Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus
^ a b c d e f Quinnipiac University
^ WPA Intelligence
^ a b c d e Emerson College Archived April 20, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b c Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Archived April 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Archived November 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ a b NYT Upshot/Siena College
^ Tulchin Research (D)
^ Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Archived November 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ Zogby Analytics
^ Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University
^ Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University
^ KFF/Cook Political Report
^ Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Archived November 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine
^ F&M/PoliticsPA
^ Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (November 24, 2020). "Pennsylvania Certificate of Ascertainment 2020" (PDF) . National Archives and Records Administration . Archived (PDF) from the original on June 29, 2021. Retrieved July 17, 2021 .
^ "Home" . Pennsylvania Department of State . Archived from the original on August 24, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2021 .
^ Pennsylvania Department of State . "Tuesday, November 3, 2020 Official Returns – Statewide" . Pennsylvania Election Returns . Archived from the original on November 22, 2021. Retrieved November 22, 2021 .
^ Federal Election Commission (January 28, 2021). "Official 2020 Presidential General Election Results" (PDF) . Archived (PDF) from the original on February 10, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021 .
^ "2020 Presidential General Election Results - Pennsylvania" .
^ "Daily Kos Elections' presidential results by congressional district for 2020, 2016, and 2012" . Daily Kos . Archived from the original on March 4, 2021. Retrieved March 4, 2021 .
^ Sprunt, Barbara (November 3, 2020). "Unlocking The Keystone State: Why Pennsylvania Is Crucial" . NPR. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2020 .
^ a b de Vogue, Ariane (October 19, 2020). "Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania to count mail-in ballots received after Election Day" . CNN. Archived from the original on February 17, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2020 .
^ Tamari, Jonathan; Brennan, Chris; Walsh, Sean Collins; Lai, Jonathan (November 15, 2020). "Philly was supposed to turn out huge for Biden. It didn't. What happened?" . Philadelphia Inquirer . Archived from the original on December 5, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020 .
^ Brennan, Chris (November 8, 2020). "Philly put Biden over the top, but Trump did better in the city than four years ago" . Philadelphia Inquirer . Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020 .
^ Garrison, Joey (November 13, 2020). "Donald Trump keeps baselessly claiming voter fraud in cities. But suburbs actually lost him the election" . USA Today . Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020 .
^ Morrison, Oliver (November 12, 2020). "How Allegheny County delivered Pennsylvania to Biden" . Public Source . Archived from the original on November 27, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2020 .
^ Sentinel, Zack Hoopes The (November 24, 2020). "Analysis: Mapping out the 2020 vote in Cumberland County" . The Sentinel . Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved January 15, 2021 .
^ "Trump, the Republican Party, and Westmoreland County" . Atavist . August 1, 2018. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021 .
^ "Westmoreland County still went heavily for Trump — just not as much as 2016 | TribLIVE.com" . triblive.com . November 7, 2020. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved January 15, 2021 .
^ admin (April 3, 2012). "Coming to an exurb near you" . Central Penn Business Journal . Archived from the original on March 10, 2021. Retrieved January 16, 2021 .
^ a b "Pennsylvania Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted" . The New York Times . November 3, 2020. Archived from the original on December 18, 2020. Retrieved December 19, 2020 .
^ "Pennsylvania 2020 President exit polls" . www.cnn.com . Archived from the original on December 30, 2022. Retrieved December 14, 2020 .
^ Teresa Boeckel, Pennsylvania certifies election win for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Archived November 26, 2020, at the Wayback Machine , York Daily Record (November 24, 2020).
^ Lauren Egan, Pennsylvania certifies Biden win, dimming Trump hopes of overturning election result Archived January 20, 2021, at the Wayback Machine , NBC News (November 24, 2020).
^ "The Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee is holding a public hearing to discuss 2020 election issues and irregularities, at the request of Republican Senator Doug Mastriano" . YouTube . November 25, 2020. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved November 25, 2020 .{{cite web }}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link )
^ Swanson, Ian (November 25, 2020). "Trump cancels plans to attend Pennsylvania GOP event on election" . TheHill . Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved November 25, 2020 .
^ Vella, Lauren (November 28, 2020). "Pennsylvania Supreme Court strikes down GOP bid to stop election certification" . The Hill . Archived from the original on November 29, 2020. Retrieved November 29, 2020 .
^ "PENNSYLVANIA MEMBERS OF CONGRESS RELEASE STATEMENT REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTORS" . Representative Dan Meuser . December 31, 2020. Archived from the original on May 25, 2022. Retrieved June 20, 2022 .
^ Woodall, Candy (June 9, 2021). "Wolf, Democrats say Pa. already had election audits — and Biden won" . GoErie . Retrieved September 8, 2023 .
^ Albiges, Marie (March 10, 2021). "Pa. Audit Confirms Biden Got More Votes than Trump, but Can't Tell Us Much Else" . Philadelphia Inquirer . Retrieved September 8, 2023 .
^ Walker, Carter (January 13, 2023). "No significant changes found in hand recount of 2020 presidential election in Pa.'s Lycoming County" . Spotlight PA . Votebeat. Retrieved April 1, 2024 .
^ McGoldrick, Gillian (August 18, 2022). "Butler County Finishes 2020 Election Review After 170 Hours" . Pittsburgh Post-Gazette . Governing. Retrieved April 1, 2024 .
^ O'Key, Sean; Wolf, Zachary B. (January 6, 2021). "Tracking the electoral vote count in Congress" . CNN . Archived from the original on January 6, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021 .
^ "Roll Call 1" . Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives . January 7, 2021. Archived from the original on January 7, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021 .
Further reading
Shawn Donnan (September 2, 2020), "A Rust Belt Town's Loyalties Divide as Pennsylvania Turns Purple" , Bloomberg.com , archived from the original on September 10, 2020 . (Focus on the town of Ambridge )
David Weigel ; Lauren Tierney (September 6, 2020), "The seven political states of Pennsylvania" , Washingtonpost.com , archived from the original on September 7, 2020, retrieved September 7, 2020 . (Describes political geography of regions: Allegheny , Central , Dutch Country , Northeast , Philadelphia, Southeast , and West ).
Michael Sokolove (September 10, 2020), "How Trump Could Win Pennsylvania Again" , The New York Times , archived from the original on September 10, 2020
David Wasserman (October 6, 2020), "The 10 Bellwether Counties That Show How Trump Is in Serious Trouble" , The New York Times . (Describes bellwether Erie County, Pennsylvania )
Michael Scherer ; et al. (October 10, 2020), "Pennsylvania emerges as 'tipping-point' battleground for Biden and Trump — before and after Election Day" , Washingtonpost.com
External links
U.S. President U.S. Senate U.S. House (election ratings ) Governors Attorneys general Secretaries of state State treasurers State legislatures
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan House
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Mayors
Bakersfield, CA
Baltimore, MD
Baton Rouge, LA
Clearwater, FL
Corpus Christi, TX
El Paso, TX
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fresno, CA
Honolulu, HI
Irvine, CA
Lubbock, TX
Mesa, AZ
Miami-Dade County, FL
Milwaukee, WI
Phoenix, AZ
Portland, OR
Richmond, VA
Riverside, CA
Sacramento, CA
Salt Lake County, UT
San Diego, CA
San Juan, PR
Santa Ana, CA
Stockton, CA
Tulsa, OK
Virginia Beach, VA
Wilmington, DE
Winston-Salem, NC
Local
Clearwater, FL
Cook County, IL
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles County, CA
New Castle County, DE
Orange County, CA
Portland, OR
San Diego, CA
San Diego County, CA
San Francisco, CA
Washington, DC
Statewide Related