Klarman specializes in the constitutional history of race.[10] He contends that the Supreme Court of the United States has historically been hostile to the rights of minorities and has not consistently enforced constitutional protections for them. Klarman argues that civil rights protections arise out of social mores from which the court takes its cue.[1][4]
Klarman, Michael J. (1994). "How Brown Changed Race Relations: The Backlash Thesis". The Journal of American History. 81 (1): 81–118. doi:10.2307/2080994. JSTOR2080994. Preview.
Response to McConnell: Klarman, Michael J. (October 1995). "Response: Brown, originalism, and constitutional theory: a response to Professor Mcconnell". Virginia Law Review. 81 (7): 1881–1936. doi:10.2307/1073643. JSTOR1073643.
Klarman, Michael J. (2004). From Jim Crow to civil rights: the Supreme Court and the struggle for racial equality. Oxford University Press. ISBN9780195129038. Preview.
^Klarman, Michael J. (May 1991). "The Puzzling Resistance to Political Process Theory". Virginia Law Review. 77 (4): 747–832. doi:10.2307/1073297. JSTOR 1073297.