The Peach War, sometimes called the Peach Tree War, was a one-day occupation of New Amsterdam on September 15, 1655, by several hundred Munsee, followed by raids on Staten Island and Pavonia. 40 colonists were killed and over 100, mostly women and children, were taken captive.
The cause of the Peach War has been the subject of debate. The armed protest and raids may have been triggered by the murder of a Munsee woman who was stealing peaches from the orchard of Dutch colonist Hendrick van Dyck. Some writers, however, have speculated that the Peach War was orchestrated by the Susquehannock in response to the Dutch attack on New Sweden.
In 1655, the Dutch West India Company ordered Director-General Peter Stuyvesant to conquer the colony of New Sweden. New Sweden had been established on the Delaware River in 1638 in territory claimed by the Dutch and had developed a close trading relationship with the Susquehannock who inhabited the lower Susquehanna River valley. In late August 1655, Stuyvesant with seven armed vessels and 317 soldiers sailed from New Amsterdam for Delaware Bay. On September 15, 1655, Governor Johan Risingh surrendered Fort Christina and the colony without a fight.[2]
Occupation of New Amsterdam
At daybreak on September 15, 1655, about 500 Munsee in 64 canoes landed near the southern end of Manhattan. They proceeded to break down doors, ransack houses, and threaten or beat some of the occupants, although no deaths or serious injuries occurred. The sachems met with members of the colony's governing council at Fort Amsterdam and agreed to withdraw at sunset. Meanwhile, the councillors called the citizens to arms and a guard was mounted. As the Munsee gathered at the riverbank to depart, Hendrick van Dyck was shot and wounded by an arrow. In response, New Netherland's fiscal, Cornelis van Tienhoven, urged the guard to open fire. In the ensuing skirmish, three Munsee and three colonists were killed. One group of Munsee then crossed the Hudson River and attacked Pavonia while a second group raided Staten Island.[3]
Stuyvesant later reported that in the attacks “40 Christians” were killed and 100, mostly women and children, taken captive. He further reported that 28 farms had been destroyed, 12,000 skipples (9,000 bushels) of grain burned, and 500 head of cattle taken or killed.[2]
Cause
Based on the reports of Stuyvesant, van Tienhoven, and members of the governing council, the directors of the Dutch West India Company concluded that the occupation of New Amsterdam was prompted by Hendrick van Dyck's murder of the Munsee woman he caught picking peaches in his orchard. The attacks on Pavonia and Staten Island were blamed on the actions of Cornelis van Tienhoven on the evening of the 15th: "Whoever considers only his last transaction with the savages, will find that with clouded brains, filled with liquor, he was a prime cause of this dreadful massacre."[4]
While the Peach War is often described as a retaliatory attack on New Amsterdam, no blood was spilled until the evening of the 15th. University of Iowa historian Tom Arne Midtrød observed: "If the Natives meant to launch a military attack on New Amsterdam, they could have done far more damage."[5]
A number of historians have speculated that the Susquehannock were behind the armed protest. In a letter to Stuyvesant, the governing council reported the presence of a Minqua (Susquehannock) sachem during the riot. Because of their close relationship with the Swedes, the Susquehannock are thought to have encouraged the Munsee to occupy New Amsterdam to force Stuyvesant to abandon his attack on New Sweden.[6][7] American historian Allan Trelease, however, noted that direct action on the Delaware by the Susquehannock would have been more to the point.[3]
Aftermath
The Hackensack began releasing their captives in October with other Munsee bands following suit. During negotiations for the release of captives, Captain Adrian Post repeatedly travelled between New Amsterdam and the Hackensack encampment at Paulus Hook. By October 21, 1655, fifty-six captives had been released in exchange for powder, lead, guns, blankets, and wampum. Further negotiations secured the release of almost all other prisoners.[8] A year later Stuyvesant was able to report that only two or three children had not been returned to their families.[1]
Stuyvesant was strongly opposed to taking military action against the Munsee. The Director-General ordered that new settlements include a blockhouse for defence, that alcohol not be to given to Indigenous people nor their muskets repaired, and that trade be restricted to a single location. Van Tienhoven disagreed with Stuyvesant's approach arguing that it was "just and lawful to undertake war" against the Munsee.[3]
In 1656, the Dutch West India Company ordered Cornelis van Tienhoven relieved of his post as fiscal due to "manifold complaints" and allegations of fraud. Several months later his hat and cane were found floating in the Hudson River although it is not known if he drowned or absconded.[4]
References
^ abShorto, Russell (2004). The Island at the Center of the World: The Epic Story of Dutch Manhattan and the Forgotten Colony that Shaped America. New York, New York: Doubleday. ISBN978-0385503495.
^ abGehring, Charles T. (1995). "Hodi Mihi, Cras Tibi: Swedish-Dutch Relations in the Delaware Valley". In Hoffecker, Carol E.; et al. (eds.). New Sweden in America. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware Press. pp. 69–85.
^Midtrød, Tom Arne (2012). The Memory of All Ancient Customs: Native American Diplomacy in the Colonial Hudson Valley. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN978-0801449376.
^Van Zandt, Cynthia Jean (2008). Brothers among Nations: The Pursuit of Intercultural Alliances in Early America, 1580-1660. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0195181241.
^Meuwese, Mark (2012). Brothers in Arms, Partners in Trade. Boston, Massachusetts: Brill. ISBN978-9004210837.
