This template is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate"],"text":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate","linkableTitle":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate"}-->
Name "Baltimore classification" no longer appropriate
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate"],"text":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate","linkableTitle":"Name \"Baltimore classification\" no longer appropriate"}-->
This template seems to have been expanded beyond just the Baltimore classification (which as I understand it was just the I, II, III, IV, V, etc.) It now includes groupings above and below that level. A new title for the template is probably in order. Thoughts? Suggestions? Zodon (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z","author":"Zodon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-08T02:07:00.000Z-Name_\"Baltimore_classification\"_no_longer_appropriate","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?"],"text":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?","linkableTitle":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?"}-->
Collapsing - by DNA/RNA/etc. or by Baltimore class?
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?"],"text":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?","linkableTitle":"Collapsing - by DNA\/RNA\/etc. or by Baltimore class?"}-->
The template was fairly large, so I added collapsing.
First I tried it with making the groups DNA, RNA and retroviruses collapsible. e.g. [1]
Then tried collapsing by Baltimore class (I, II, etc.) [2]
They work out about the same screen size. Any thoughts about preferred version? Zodon (talk) 05:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z","author":"Zodon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zodon-2008-11-09T05:41:00.000Z-Collapsing_-_by_DNA\/RNA\/etc._or_by_Baltimore_class?","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Out_of_date-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date"],"text":"Out of date","linkableTitle":"Out of date"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Out_of_date-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date"],"text":"Out of date","linkableTitle":"Out of date"}-->
This template may be well out of date by now. Editing here to remember to update it later. Bervin61 (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be out of date again: Pithovirus not mentioned as member of NCLDV (of course fam. Pithoviridae is a proposal only). Paramyxoviridae are now of order ...--Ernsts (talk) 05:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z","author":"Bervin61","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bervin61-2015-03-19T12:03:00.000Z-Out_of_date","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Indexing_for_Search_Engines-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines"],"text":"Indexing for Search Engines","linkableTitle":"Indexing for Search Engines"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Indexing_for_Search_Engines-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines"],"text":"Indexing for Search Engines","linkableTitle":"Indexing for Search Engines"}-->
Is it possible to make this template not to be indexed by Web search engines?
If I use a Web Search Engine (e. g. Startpage) 'every looking for any item mentioned in the template, then any article is presented as a hit that has the template included. Because of this there is a lot of useless hits that avoids finding any hits with real information. I zhink there should be a way as articles in one's user area are not indexed.
Kind regards! --Ernsts (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z","author":"Ernsts","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ernsts-2021-06-15T16:33:00.000Z-Indexing_for_Search_Engines","replies":[]}}-->
