As an astronomer, Gemma is significant for his observations of a lunar eclipse in 1569 and of the 1572 supernova appearing in Cassiopeia, which he recorded on 9 November, two days before Tycho Brahe, calling it a "New Venus."[1] With Brahe, he was one of the few astronomers to identify the Great Comet of 1577 as superlunary. Gemma is also credited with publishing the first scientific illustration of the aurora, in his 1575 book on the supernova.[2]
Another milestone appears in his medical writings: in 1552, Gemma published the first illustration of a human tapeworm.[3]
Gemma's two major works, De arte cyclognomica (Antwerp, 1569) and De naturae divinis characterismis (Antwerp, 1575), have been called "true 'hidden gems' in early modern intellectual history," bringing together such topics as medicine, astronomy, astrology, teratology, divination, eschatology, and encyclopaedism.[4]
Gemma also has the distinction of being called "the first true orchid hobbyist, in the modern sense."[5]
Life
Cornelius Gemma was born on 28 February 1535[6] in Leuven, but attended the Latin school at Mechelen. He began studying with the arts faculty in Leuven at the age of 14, and continued at the medical faculty. In 1569, he succeeded professor Nicolas Biesius and obtained a doctorate in 1570.[6]
Gemma died in Leuven around 1578, during an epidemic of the plague to which a third of the city's population had also succumbed.[7] Although he had already proven to be a prolific writer, he was only in his mid-forties. His epitaph consists of two elegiac couplets in Latin, punning on lapis ("stone, precious stone, tombstone") and Gemma ("precious stone, gem"). He was survived by two sons: Raphael, who entered the priesthood, and Philip, who followed family tradition as a medical doctor.[8]
Works
Gemma edited his father's posthumous work De astrolabo catholica (1556). In 1560, he began publishing his own work in the annual series Ephemerides meteorologicae, printed by Joannes Withagen. The Ephemerides is the earliest known astrological work from the Low Countries to carry an official notice of approval from the Roman Catholic Church. Gemma moved away from judicial astrology and renounced astrological predictions about political events, and seems to have gradually confined himself to predictions about astronomical phenomena and meteorological astrology. His predictions for 1561, for example, provided detailed information on every lunar phase, and most planetary aspects and phases of fixed stars in relation to the sun, with a thoroughness that surpassed the predictions of his contemporaries.[9] He remained committed to astrologic medicine, however, and believed that predictable atmospheric conditions, extending to astral conjunctions, generated disease.[10]
Gemma attempted to formulate a universal philosophy that brought together inferiors and celestials, nature, soul and intellect, numbers, ideas and external objects. In the three volumes De arte cyclognomica, he synthesized the teachings of Hippocrates, Plato, Galen, and Aristotle by a method perhaps derived from Lullius. This "cyclognomic art" is an arrangement of seven concentric circles, starting from the outermost:
A profusion of charts, celestial diagrams, and spherical triangles is characteristic of Gemma's ars cyclognomica, as is the use of three as a mystic number. Disciplines are grouped under three faculties or spheres:
imaginatio (physics, astronomy, medicine and related fields);
ratio (grammar, rhetoric, cyclognomic, dialectic);
Gemma's two volumes De naturae divinis characterismis (1575), on divine marks or features in nature, included tales of medical marvels. An example may be found online in the Compendium Maleficiarum of Francesco Maria Guazzo: a 15-year-old girl was reported to excrete a live eel and to vomit a prodigious stream of hairs, skin fragments, stones and bones. Although the cause was thought to be demonic, Gemma is said to have approached treatment with "natural causes." Guazzo also says that Gemma discussed spontaneous sex change in humans.[13]
Gemma viewed the relation of prodigies and cosmology in light of his medical practice; that is, just as a physician could interpret a patient's symptoms to predict disease, a reading of prodigies in nature could provide insight into divine intention in the universe. He regarded this ars cosmocritica as a new science.[14]
The Great Comet of 1577
One of Gemma's more scientifically significant works[15] dealt with the Great Comet of 1577, which he first observed on 14 November of that year. Gemma was one of the few astronomers — most famously Tycho Brahe, but also Helisaeus Roeslin, William IV, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel and Michael Mästlin — who identified the comet as superlunary.[16] Brahe was highly critical of his colleague's mathematical deficiencies, but praised his section on macrocosmic portents and on the comet's physical characteristics. Gemma subordinated his accurate astronomical observations to a moral purpose; "to Gemma," writes Tabitta van Nouhuys, "the investigation of the comet's mathematical and physical characteristics was not an end in itself, but a means of gaining an insight into the arrangement of the cosmos and the divinely inspired sympathies between its parts."[17]
Bibliography
Thorndike, Lynn.History of Magic and Experimental Science, unknown edition. On Cornelius Gemma, pp. 406–408, limited preview online.
Vanden Broecke, Steven. The Limits of Influence: Pico, Louvain, and the Crisis of Renaissance Astrology. Brill, 2003. On Cornelius Gemma, pp. 186–190, limited preview online.
van Nouhuys, Tabitta. The Age of Two-faced Janus: The Comets of 1577 and 1618 and the Decline of the Aristotelian World View in the Netherlands. Brill, 1998. Extensive discussion of Gemma's views on comets, pp. 169–189 online.
Hiro Hirai, "Cornelius Gemma and His Neoplatonic Reading of Hippocrates," in: Hiro Hirai, Medical Humanism and Natural Philosophy: Renaissance Debates on Matter, Life and the Soul (Boston-Leiden: Brill, 2011), 104–122.
Further reading
Hirai, Hiro, editor. Cornelius Gemma: Cosmology, Medicine and Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Louvain. Fabrizio Serra, 2008. Proceedings from an international conference on Cornelius Gemma held on 23 February 2007, at Ghent University. ISBN88-6227-118-2ISBN9788862271189
Contents:
"A Poem on the Copernican System: Cornelius Gemma and His Cosmocritical Art" by Fernand Hallyn;
"Il linguaggio universale dei cieli: Cornelio Gemma, Tycho Brahe, Tommaso Campanella" by Germana Ernst;
"'Vere Gemmeum est?': Cornelio Gemma e la stella nuova del 1572" by Dario Tessicini;
"La notion de prodige selon Cornelius Gemma" by Jean Céard;
"Cornelius Gemma et l'épidémie de 1574" by Concetta Pennuto;
"Cornelius Gemma and Universal Method" by Stephen Clucas;
"Cornelius Gemma, Philosophie und Methode: Eine Analyse des ersten Buches der Ars cyclognomica" by Thomas Leinkauf.
Additional bibliography may be found at the conference website.
Notes
^In his Latin biography, Melchior Adam says that Gemma died on 12 October 1579, at the age of 45; modern scholars, however, almost uniformly cite 1578 as the year of his death.
^University of Oklahoma Libraries, History of Science Collections, Recent Acquisitions, "The First Book Printed on Tycho Brahe's Printing Press at Uraniborg: Diarium, 1586," The Lynx 2 (November 2005), p. 9 onlineArchived 20 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine with Gemma's illustration.
^Cornelius Gemma: Cosmology, Medicine and Natural Philosophy in Renaissance Louvain conference proceedings website.Archived 6 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
^Pierre Jacquet, "History of Orchids in Europe, from Antiquity to the 17th Century," ''Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives 6 (1994), as cited by Joseph Arditti, Orchid Biology (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002), p. 27 online.
^Vanden Broecke, The Limits of Influence, pp. 186–190.
^Lynn Thorndike, History of Magic and Experimental Science, unknown edition, p. 408.
^Charles P. Krauth, A Vocabulary of the Philosophical Sciences (New York 1878), p. 625 online.
^Grazia Tonelli Olivieri, "Galen and Francis Bacon: Faculties of the Soul and the Classification of Knowledge," in The Shape of Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Springer, 1991) online.
^Francesco Maria Guazzo, Compendium Maleficiarum (1628, republished 1920 and 2004), pp. 57 and 108.
^Stuart Clark, Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe (Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 367 online.
^De prodigiosa specie, naturaque Cometae, qui nobis effulsit altior lunae sedibus, insolita prorsus figura, ac magnitudine, anno 1570.
^Robert S. Westman, "The Comet and the Cosmos: Kepler, Mästlin, and the Copernican Hypothesis," in The Reception of Copernicus' Heliocentric Theory: Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the Nicolas Copernicus Committee of the International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science, Torun, Poland, 1973 (Springer, 1973), pp. 10 and 28. For a description and reproduction of Helisaeus Roeslin's diagram, see pp. 28–29 online.
^Tabitta van Nouhuys, The Age of Two-faced Janus (Brill, 1998), pp. 169–189.