As of 2013[update], the IRP had 1,200 principal investigators and more than 4,000 postdoctoral fellows in basic, translational, and clinical research, being the largest biomedical research institution in the world,[1] while, as of 2003, the extramural arm provided 28% of biomedical research funding spent annually in the U.S., or about US$26.4 billion.[2]
In 2019, the NIH was ranked number two in the world, behind Harvard University, for biomedical sciences in the Nature Index, which measured the largest contributors to papers published in a subset of leading journals from 2015 to 2018.[4][5]
In 1901, the Division of Scientific Research was formed, which included the Hygienic Laboratory as well as other research offices of the Marine Hospital Service.[11] In 1912, the Marine Hospital Service became the Public Health Service (PHS).[9] In 1922, PHS established a Special Cancer Investigations laboratory at Harvard Medical School. This marked the beginning of a partnership with universities.[9]
In 1930, the Hygienic Laboratory was re-designated as the National Institute of Health by the Ransdell Act, and was given $750,000 to construct two NIH buildings at the Old Naval Observatory campus.[9] In 1937, NIH absorbed the rest of the Division of Scientific Research, of which it was formerly part.[11][12]
In 1938, NIH moved to its current campus in Bethesda, Maryland.[9] Over the next few decades, Congress would markedly increase funding of the NIH, and various institutes and centers within the NIH were created for specific research programs.[9] In 1944, the Public Health Service Act was approved, and the National Cancer Institute became a division of NIH. In 1948, the name changed from National Institute of Health to National Institutes of Health.
Later history
In the 1960s, virologist and cancer researcher Chester M. Southam injected HeLa cancer cells into patients at the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital.[13]: 130 When three doctors resigned after refusing to inject patients without their consent, the experiment gained considerable media attention.[13]: 133 The NIH was a major source of funding for Southam's research and had required all research involving human subjects to obtain their consent prior to any experimentation.[13]: 135 Upon investigating all of their grantee institutions, the NIH discovered that the majority of them did not protect the rights of human subjects. From then on, the NIH has required all grantee institutions to approve any research proposals involving human experimentation with review boards.[13]: 135
In 1967, the Division of Regional Medical Programs was created to administer grants for research for heart disease, cancer, and strokes. That same year, the NIH director lobbied the White House for increased federal funding in order to increase research and the speed with which health benefits could be brought to the people. An advisory committee was formed to oversee the further development of the NIH and its research programs. By 1971 cancer research was in full force and President Nixon signed the National Cancer Act, initiating a National Cancer Program, President's Cancer Panel, National Cancer Advisory Board, and 15 new research, training, and demonstration centers.[14]
Funding for the NIH has often been a source of contention in Congress, serving as a proxy for the political currents of the time. In 1992, the NIH encompassed nearly 1 percent of the federal government's operating budget and controlled more than 50 percent of all funding for health research, and 85 percent of all funding for health studies in universities.[15] While government funding for research in other disciplines has been increasing at a rate similar to inflation since the 1970s, research funding for the NIH nearly tripled through the 1990s and early 2000s, but has remained relatively stagnant since then.[16]
By the 1990s, the NIH committee focus had shifted to DNA research and launched the Human Genome Project.[17]
The NIH Office of the Director is the central office responsible for setting policy for NIH, and for planning, managing, and coordinating the programs and activities of all NIH components. The NIH Director plays an active role in shaping the agency's activities and outlook. The Director is responsible for providing leadership to the Institutes and Centers by identifying needs and opportunities, especially in efforts involving multiple Institutes.[18] Within the Director's Office is the Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives with 12 divisions including:
The Agency Intramural Research Integrity Officer "is directly responsible for overseeing the resolution of all research misconduct allegations involving intramural research, and for promoting research integrity within the NIH Office of Intramural Research (OIR)."[19] There is a Division of Extramural Activities, which has its own Director.[20] The Office of Ethics has its own Director,[21] as does the Office of Global Research.[22]
As of 2017, 153 scientists receiving financial support from the NIH have been awarded a Nobel Prize and 195 have been awarded a Lasker Award.[26]
Intramural and extramural research
NIH devotes 10% of its funding to research within its own facilities (intramural research), and gives >80% of its funding in research grants to extramural (outside) researchers.[27] Of this extramural funding, a certain percentage (2.8% in 2014) must be granted to small businesses under the SBIR/STTR program.[28] As of 2011[update], the extramural funding consisted of about 50,000 grants to more than 325,000 researchers at more than 3000 institutions.[29] By 2018[update], this rate of granting remained reasonably steady, at 47,000 grants to 2,700 organizations.[27] In FY 2010[update], NIH spent US$10.7bn (not including temporary funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) on clinical research, US$7.4bn on genetics-related research, US$6.0bn on prevention research, US$5.8bn on cancer, and US$5.7bn on biotechnology.[30]
In 2008 a Congressional mandate called for investigators funded by the NIH to submit an electronic version of their final manuscripts to the National Library of Medicine's research repository, PubMed Central (PMC), no later than 12 months after the official date of publication.[31] The NIH Public Access Policy was the first public access mandate for a U.S. public funding agency.[32]
Economic return
In 2000, the Joint Economic Committee of Congress reported NIH research, which was funded at $16 billion a year in 2000, that some econometric studies had given a rate of return of 25 to 40 percent per year by reducing the economic cost of illness in the US. It found that of the 21 drugs with the highest therapeutic impact on society introduced between 1965 and 1992, public funding was "instrumental" for 15.[33] As of 2011 NIH-supported research helped to discover 153 new FDA-approved drugs, vaccines, and new indications for drugs in the 40 years prior.[34] One study found NIH funding aided either directly or indirectly in developing the drugs or drug targets for all of the 210 FDA-approved drugs from 2010 to 2016.[35] In 2015, Pierre Azoulay et al. estimated $10 million invested in research generated two to three new patents.[36]
Notable discoveries and developments
Since its inception, the NIH intramural research program has been a source of many pivotal scientific and medical discoveries. Some of these include:
1943: Wilton R. Earle pioneered the cell culture process and published a paper describing the production of malignancy in vitro, Katherine K. Sanford developed the first clone from an isolated cancer cell, and Virginia J. Evans devised a medium that supported growth of cells in vitro.
1960s: Discovered the first human slow virus disease, kuru, which is a degenerative, fatal infection of the central nervous system. This discovery of a new mechanism for infectious diseases revolutionized thinking in microbiology and neurology.
1960s: Defined the mechanisms that regulate noradrenaline, one of the most important neurotransmitters in the brain.
1960s: Developed the first licensed rubella vaccine and the first test for rubella antibodies for large scale testing.
1960s: Developed an effective combination drug regimen for Hodgkin's lymphoma.
1960s: Discovery that tooth decay is caused by bacteria.
In September 2006, the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research started a contract for the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function to develop a set of state-of-the-art measurement tools to enhance collection of data in large cohort studies. Scientists from more than 100 institutions nationwide contributed. In September 2012, the NIH Toolbox was rolled out to the research community. NIH Toolbox assessments are based, where possible, on Item Response Theory and adapted for testing by computer.[citation needed]
Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes
NIH sponsors the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), a repository of information produced by studies investigating the interaction of genotype and phenotype. The information includes phenotypes, molecular assay data, analyses and documents. Summary-level data is available to the general public whereas the individual-level data is accessible to researchers.[38] According to the City Journal NIH denies access to such attributes as intelligence, education and health on the grounds that studying their genetic basis would be stigmatizing.[39]
Coronavirus vaccine
The NIH partnered with Moderna in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic to develop a vaccine. The final phase of testing began on July 27 with up to 30,000 volunteers assigned to one of two groups—one receiving the mRNA-1273 vaccine and the other receiving salt water injections—and continued until there had been approximately 100 cases of COVID-19 among the participants.[40][41] In 2021, the NIH contributed $4,395,399 towards the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) program.[42]
Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, NIH-funded EcoHealth Alliance has been the subject of controversy and increased scrutiny due to its ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)—which has been at the center of speculation since early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 may have escaped in a lab incident.[43][44][45][46][47] Under political pressure, the NIH withdrew funding to EcoHealth Alliance in July 2020.[48]
NIH Interagency Pain Research Coordinating Committee
On February 13, 2012, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a new group of individuals assigned to research pain. This committee is composed of researchers from different organizations and will focus to "coordinate pain research activities across the federal government with the goals of stimulating pain research collaboration… and providing an important avenue for public involvement" ("Members of new", 2012). With a committee such as this research will not be conducted by each individual organization or person but instead a collaborating group which will increase the information available. With this hopefully more pain management will be available including techniques for those with arthritis.[49] In 2020 Beth Darnall, American scientist and pain psychologist, was appointed as scientific member of the group.
To allocate funds, the NIH must first obtain its budget from Congress. This process begins with institute and center (IC) leaders collaborating with scientists to determine the most important and promising research areas within their fields. IC leaders discuss research areas with NIH management who then develops a budget request for continuing projects, new research proposals, and new initiatives from the Director. NIH submits its budget request to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the HHS considers this request as a portion of its budget. Many adjustments and appeals occur between NIH and HHS before the agency submits NIH's budget request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). OMB determines what amounts and research areas are approved for incorporation into the President's final budget. The President then sends NIH's budget request to Congress in February for the next fiscal year's allocations.[51] The House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees deliberate and by fall, Congress usually appropriates funding. This process takes approximately 18 months before the NIH can allocate any actual funds.[52]
When a government shutdown occurs, the NIH continues to treat people who are already enrolled in clinical trials, but does not start any new clinical trials and does not admit new patients who are not already enrolled in a clinical trial, except for the most critically ill, as determined by the NIH Director.[53][54][55][56]
Historical funding
Over the last century, the responsibility to allocate funding has shifted from the OD and Advisory Committee to the individual ICs and Congress increasingly set apart funding for particular causes. In the 1970s, Congress began to earmark funds specifically for cancer research, and in the 1980s there was a significant amount allocated for AIDS/HIV research.[57]
Funding for the NIH has often been a source of contention in Congress, serving as a proxy for the political currents of the time. During the 1980s, President Reagan repeatedly tried to cut funding for research, only to see Congress partly restore funding. The political contention over NIH funding slowed the nation's response to the AIDS epidemic; while AIDS was reported in newspaper articles from 1981, no funding was provided for research on the disease. In 1984 National Cancer Institute scientists found implications that "variants of a human cancer virus called HTLV-III are the primary cause of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)," a new epidemic that gripped the nation.[58]
In 1992, the NIH encompassed nearly 1 percent of the federal government's operating budget and controlled more than 50 percent of all funding for health research and 85 percent of all funding for health studies in universities.[15] From 1993 to 2001 the NIH budget doubled. For a time, funding essentially remained flat, and for seven years following the financial crisis, the NIH budget struggled to keep up with inflation.[59]
In 1999 Congress increased the NIH's budget by $2.3 billion[57] to $17.2 billion in 2000.[60] In 2009 Congress again increased the NIH budget to $31 billion in 2010.[60] In 2017 and 2018, Congress passed laws with bipartisan support that substantially increasing appropriations for NIH, which was 37.3 billion dollars annually in FY2018.[61][62]
Researchers at universities or other institutions outside of NIH can apply for research project grants (RPGs) from the NIH. There are numerous funding mechanisms for different project types (e.g., basic research, clinical research, etc.) and career stages (e.g., early career, postdoc fellowships, etc.). The NIH regularly issues "requests for applications" (RFAs), e.g., on specific programmatic priorities or timely medical problems (such as Zika virus research in early 2016). In addition, researchers can apply for "investigator-initiated grants" whose subject is determined by the scientist.
The total number of applicants has increased substantially, from about 60,000 investigators who had applied during the period from 1999 to 2003 to slightly less than 90,000 in who had applied during the period from 2011 to 2015.[63] Due to this, the "cumulative investigator rate", that is, the likelihood that unique investigators are funded over a 5-year window, has declined from 43% to 31%.[63]
R01 grants are the most common funding mechanism and include investigator-initiated projects. The roughly 27,000 to 29,000 R01 applications had a funding success of 17-19% during 2012 though 2014. Similarly, the 13,000 to 14,000 R21 applications had a funding success of 13-14% during the same period.[64] In FY 2016, the total number of grant applications received by the NIH was 54,220, with approximately 19% being awarded funding.[65] Institutes have varying funding rates. The National Cancer Institute awarded funding to 12% of applicants, while the National Institute for General Medical Science awarded funding to 30% of applicants.[65]
Funding criteria
NIH employs five broad decision criteria in its funding policy. First, ensure the highest quality of scientific research by employing an arduous peer review process. Second, seize opportunities that have the greatest potential to yield new knowledge and that will lead to better prevention and treatment of disease. Third, maintain a diverse research portfolio in order to capitalize on major discoveries in a variety of fields such as cell biology, genetics, physics, engineering, and computer science. Fourth, address public health needs according to the disease burden (e.g., prevalence and mortality). And fifth, construct and support the scientific infrastructure (e.g., well-equipped laboratories and safe research facilities) necessary to conduct research.[66]
Advisory committee members advise the institute on policy and procedures affecting the external research programs and provide a second level of review for all grant and cooperative agreement applications considered by the Institute for funding.[67]
Gender and sex bias
In 2014, it was announced that the NIH is directing scientists to perform their experiments with both female and male animals, or cells derived from females as well as males if they are studying cell cultures, and that the NIH would take the balance of each study design into consideration when awarding grants.[68] The announcement also stated that this rule would probably not apply when studying sex-specific diseases (for example, ovarian or testicular cancer).[68]
Stakeholders
General public
One of the goals of the NIH is to "expand the base in medical and associated sciences in order to ensure a continued high return on the public investment in research."[69] Taxpayer dollars funding NIH are from the taxpayers, making them the primary beneficiaries of advances in research. Thus, the general public is a key stakeholder in the decisions resulting from the NIH funding policy.[70][failed verification] However, some in the general public do not feel their interests are being represented, and individuals have formed patient advocacy groups to represent their own interests.[71]
Extramural researchers and scientists
Important stakeholders of the NIH funding policy include researchers and scientists. Extramural researchers differ from intramural researchers in that they are not employed by the NIH but may apply for funding. Throughout the history of the NIH, the amount of funding received has increased, but the proportion to each IC remains relatively constant. The individual ICs then decide who will receive the grant money and how much will be allotted.
Policy changes on who receives funding significantly affect researchers. For example, the NIH has recently attempted to approve more first-time NIH R01 applicants or the research grant applications of young scientists. To encourage the participation of young scientists, the application process has been shortened and made easier.[72] In addition, first-time applicants are being offered more funding for their research grants than those who have received grants in the past.[73]
Commercial partnerships
In 2011 and 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General published a series of audit reports revealing that throughout the fiscal years 2000–2010, institutes under the aegis of the NIH did not comply with the time and amount requirements specified in appropriations statutes, in awarding federal contracts to commercial partners, committing the federal government to tens of millions of dollars of expenditure ahead of appropriation of funds from Congress.[74]
^Harden, Victoria A. "WWI and the Ransdell Act of 1930". A Short History of the National Institutes of Health. Office Of History National Institutes Of Health. Archived from the original on September 7, 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2011.
^ abLaurie J. Price (1992). "A Medical Anthropologist's Ruminations on NIH Funding". Medical Anthropology Quarterly. New Series. 6 (2): 128–146. doi:10.1525/maq.1992.6.2.02a00030. JSTOR649307.
^"NIH Leadership". National Institutes of Health (NIH). October 31, 2014. Retrieved March 18, 2019. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
^"Lasker Awards". National Institutes of Health (NIH). February 5, 2016. Archived from the original on July 5, 2016.
^ abPhilippidis, Alex (September 2019). "Top 25 NIH-Funded Institutions". Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. Vol. 39, no. 9. p. 16. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
^Garland, Eva (2014). Winning SBIR/STTR Grants: A Ten Week Plan for Preparing Your NIH Phase I Application. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN978-1494784447.
^"NIH Budget". National Institutes of Health. May 23, 2011. Archived from the original on August 26, 2011. Retrieved August 26, 2011.
^Karp PD, Sherlock G, Gerlt JA, Sim I, Paulsen I, Babbitt PC, Laderoute K, Hunter L, Sternberg P, Wooley J, Bourne PE (2008). "Changes to NIH grant system may backfire". Science. 322 (5905): 1187–8. doi:10.1126/science.322.5905.1187c. PMID19023064. S2CID47509185.
يفتقر محتوى هذه المقالة إلى الاستشهاد بمصادر. فضلاً، ساهم في تطوير هذه المقالة من خلال إضافة مصادر موثوق بها. أي معلومات غير موثقة يمكن التشكيك بها وإزالتها. (ديسمبر 2018) شلة المشاغبينمعلومات عامةاللغة الأصلية العربية تعديل - تعديل مصدري - تعديل ويكي بيانات فيلم شلة المشاغبي...
العلاقات بين سويسرا والاتحاد الأوروبي الاتحاد الأوروبي سويسرا تعديل مصدري - تعديل جزء من سلسلة مقالات سياسة الاتحاد الأوروبيالاتحاد الأوروبي الدول الأعضاء (27) إسبانيا إستونيا إيطاليا ألمانيا أيرلندا البرتغال بلجيكا بلغاريا بولندا جمهورية التشيك الدن
1988 film by Alan Myerson Police Academy 5: Assignment: Miami BeachTheatrical release poster by Carl Ramsey[1]Directed byAlan MyersonWritten byStephen CurwickBased onCharactersby Neal IsraelPat ProftProduced byPaul MaslanskyStarring Bubba Smith David Graf Michael Winslow Leslie Easterbrook Marion Ramsey Janet Jones Lance Kinsey Matt McCoy G. W. Bailey George Gaynes CinematographyJames PergolaEdited byHubert C. de la BouillerieMusic byRobert FolkDistributed byWarner Bros.Release date M...
Esta página cita fontes, mas que não cobrem todo o conteúdo. Ajude a inserir referências. Conteúdo não verificável pode ser removido.—Encontre fontes: ABW • CAPES • Google (N • L • A) (Setembro de 2012) Na mitologia chinesa, aparecem vários lugares mitológicos. Montanhas Kunlun Ver artigo principal: Kunlun Pico na cordilheira Kunlun Na mitologia chinesa, as montanhas Kunlun (崑崙) incluem o Paraíso. O primeiro a...
Тамара Великагруз. თამარი Тамара Велика [[Файл:|90px|]] Цариця Грузії 1184 — 1213 роки Попередник: Георгій III Спадкоємець: Георгій IV Лаша Ім'я при народженні: груз. თამარ მეფეазерб. Tamar Mepe Народження: 1166Мцхета, Грузія Смерть: 18 січня 1213Tabakhmelad Поховання: Гелатський м�...
Princess of Poland & Dauphine of France For other uses, see Maria Josepha of Saxony. Maria Josepha of SaxonyDauphine of FrancePortrait by Marie Victoire JaquototBorn(1731-11-04)4 November 1731Dresden Castle, Dresden, SaxonyDied13 March 1767(1767-03-13) (aged 35)Palace of Versailles, FranceBurial22 March 1767[1]Cathedral of Saint-Étienne in Sens, FranceSpouse Louis, Dauphin of France (m. 1747; died 1765)IssueDetailPrincess M...
Nama ini menggunakan cara penamaan Spanyol: nama keluarga pertama atau paternalnya adalah Gayá dan nama keluarga kedua atau maternalnya adalah Peña. José Gayà Gayá bermain untuk Valencia pada 2015Informasi pribadiNama lengkap José Luis Gayà PeñaTanggal lahir 25 Mei 1995 (umur 28)[1]Tempat lahir Pedreguer, Spanyol[1]Tinggi 172 cm (5 ft 8 in)[1]Posisi bermain Bek kiriInformasi klubKlub saat ini ValenciaNomor 14Karier junior2006–2012 Val...
El Sistema educativo de Colombia es el conjunto de normas jurídicas, programas curriculares, establecimientos educativos, instituciones sociales, recursos humanos, tecnológicos, metodológicos, materiales, administrativos y financieros, articulados para alcanzar los objetivos de la educación.[1] Se organiza en educación formal, educación para el trabajo y el desarrollo humano (reemplazando la denominación no formal)[2] y educación informal. La entidad encargada de su coor...
Inglaterra6.º puesto Titular Alternativo Datos generales Asociación FA Confederación UEFA Seudónimo The Three Lions (Los Tres Leones)The Team of Rose (El Equipo de la Rosa) Ranking FIFA 5.º lugar (junio de 2022) Participación 16.ª Mejor resultado Campeón (1966) Entrenador Gareth Southgate Estadísticas Partidos 5 Goles anotados 13 (2.6 por partido) Goles recibidos 4 (0.8 por partido) Goleadores Bukayo Saka y Marcus Rashford (3 goles cada uno) Cronología Anterior Rusia 2018 Siguiente ...
Identification on paper to prevent counterfeiting This article is about physical watermarks. For digital watermarks, see Digital watermarking. For other uses, see Watermark (disambiguation). This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Watermark – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2013...
Tranquillo Barnetta Informasi pribadiTanggal lahir 22 Mei 1985 (umur 38)Tempat lahir St. Gallen, SwissTinggi 1,76 m (5 ft 9+1⁄2 in)Posisi bermain Pemain tengahInformasi klubKlub saat ini Schalke 04Nomor 27Karier junior1991–1996 FC Rotmonten St. Gallen1996–2002 St. GallenKarier senior*Tahun Tim Tampil (Gol)2002–2004 St. Gallen 60 (15)2004–2012 Bayer Leverkusen 187 (23)2004–2005 → Hannover 96 (pinjaman) 7 (2)2012– Schalke 04 12 (0)Tim nasional‡2004– S...
House in Vila Real, PortugalMateus PalacePalácio de MateusGeneral informationTypeHouseArchitectural stylePortuguese Northern BaroqueLocationVila Real, PortugalConstruction started1739Completed1743Governing bodyPrivateDesign and constructionArchitect(s)Nicolau Nasoni The Mateus Palace (Portuguese: Palácio de Mateus, Solar de Mateus or Casa de Mateus) is a palace located in the civil parish of Mateus, municipality of Vila Real, Portugal. The three primary buildings are the manor, the winery a...
37th FIS Alpine World Ski ChampionshipsHost citySt. Moritz, SwitzerlandEvents10Opening2 February 2003Closing16 February 2003Opened byPascal Couchepin← 20012005 → Piz Nairclass=notpageimage| Location of Piz Nair in Switzerland Piz Nairclass=notpageimage| Location of Piz Nair in the Alps of Europe The FIS Alpine World Ski Championships 2003 were held in St. Moritz, Switzerland, at Piz Nair from February 2–16, 2003.[1] St. Moritz previously hosted the world champi...
Miss Colombia 2013Paulina Vega, Miss Colombia 2013 (photographed in 2014)DateNovember 11, 2013PresentersAndrea Serna, Catalina Robayo, Carlos CaleroEntertainmentAlejandro SanzVenueAuditorio Getsemani-Centro de Convenciones Julio César Turbay Ayala Cartagena de Indias, ColombiaBroadcasterRCN TVEntrants21Placements10WithdrawalsCordoba, Cundinamarca, Santander, SucreWinnerPaulina Vega Dieppa AtlánticoCongenialityCarolina Crovo Sierra AntioquiaBest National CostumePaulina Vega Dieppa Atlántico...
Canadian designer and drag performer JimboJimbo at RuPaul's DragCon LA in 2023BornJames Insell (1982-11-10) November 10, 1982 (age 41)[1]London, Ontario, CanadaEducationUniversity of Western Ontario (BS)Occupation(s)Drag queen, designerYears active2000s–presentKnown forCanada's Drag Race (season 1)RuPaul's Drag Race: UK vs the WorldRuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 8)PredecessorJinkx MonsoonWebsitehouseofjimbo.com James Insell (born November 10, 1982), better known...
Polish musician, singer, songwriter and composer Anja Orthodox in 2003 singing Anja Orthodox (born December 24, 1964 in Warsaw) is a Polish musician, singer, songwriter and composer. She is known primarily for her many years of performances in the band Closterkeller, performing music from the borderline of rock and gothic metal. She has also collaborated with bands such as Wilki, Sweet Noise, Voo Voo, Abraxas and Ira. She is often referred to by the media as the first lady of Polish metal and...
Nasal retrofleja ɳCodificaciónN.º de orden en el AFI 117Unicode (hex) U+0273X-SAMPA n`Kirshenbaum n.Braille Sonido Pronunciación Véase también: Alfabeto Fonético Internacional[editar datos en Wikidata] La nasal retrofleja es un tipo de consonante usada en algunos idiomas. El símbolo en el Alfabeto Fonético Internacional que representa este sonido es ɳ, y el símbolo equivalente en X-SAMPA es n`. Como todas las consonantes retroflejas, su símbolo del AFI está formad...
Kongres Amerika Serikat ke-81Gedung Kapitol (1956)Periode3 Januari 1949 – 3 Januari 1951Anggota96 senator435 anggota dewan3 delegasi tanpa suaraMayoritas SenatPartai DemokratPresiden SenatLowong (sampai 20 Januari 1949)Alben W. Barkley (D) (dari 20 Januari 1949)Mayoritas DPRPartai DemokratKetua DPRSam Rayburn (D)Pres. Senat Pro TemporeKenneth McKellar (D)Sesike-1: 3 Januari 1949 – 19 Oktober 1949ke-2: 3 Januari 1950 – 2 Januari 1951ke-80 ←→ ke-82 Kongres Amerika Serik...
Settlement in sub-Roman Britain Not to be confused with Pengwern Boat Club. For the modern settlement with the same name, see Pengwern, Denbighshire. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Pengwern – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this templat...