The adverse effect profile of pivmecillinam is similar to that of other penicillins. The most common side effects of mecillinam use are rash and gastrointestinal upset, including nausea and vomiting.[4][5]
Prodrugs that release pivalate anions when broken down by the body — such as pivmecillinam, pivampicillin and cefditoren pivoxil — have long been known to deplete levels of carnitine.[6][7] This is not due to the drug itself, but to the pivalate anion, which is mostly removed from the body by forming a conjugate with carnitine. Although short-term use of these drugs can cause a marked decrease in blood levels of carnitine,[8] it is unlikely to be of clinical significance;[7] long-term use, however, appears problematic and is not recommended.[7][9][10]
History
The efficacy of pivmecillinam in treating females eighteen years of age or older with uncomplicated UTIs was assessed in three controlled clinical trials comparing different pivmecillinam dosing regimens to placebo, to another oral antibacterial drug and to ibuprofen (an anti-inflammatory drug).[3] The primary measure of efficacy for the three trials was the composite response rate, which included clinical cure (resolution of the symptoms of the uncomplicated UTI that were present in participants at trial entry and no new symptoms) and microbiological response (demonstration that the bacteria cultured from participants' urine at trial entry was reduced).[3] The composite response rate was assessed approximately 8 to 14 days after participants were enrolled into the studies.[3] In the clinical trial comparing pivmecillinam to placebo, 62% of the 137 participants who received pivmecillinam achieved the composite response compared to 10% of the 134 who received placebo.[3] In the clinical trial comparing pivmecillinam to another oral antibacterial drug, 72% of the 127 participants who received pivmecillinam achieved composite response compared to 76% of the 132 who received the comparator drug.[3] In the clinical trial comparing pivmecillinam to ibuprofen, 66% of the 105 participants who received pivmecillinam achieved composite response compared to 22% of the 119 who received ibuprofen.[3]
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the application for pivmecillinam priority review and qualified infectious disease product designations.[3] The FDA granted the approval of Pivya to Utility Therapeutics Ltd.[3]
^Abrahamsson K, Holme E, Jodal U, Lindstedt S, Nordin I (June 1995). "Effect of short-term treatment with pivalic acid containing antibiotics on serum carnitine concentration—a risk irrespective of age". Biochem. Mol. Med. 55 (1): 77–9. doi:10.1006/bmme.1995.1036. PMID7551831.
^Holme E, Jodal U, Linstedt S, Nordin I (September 1992). "Effects of pivalic acid-containing prodrugs on carnitine homeostasis and on response to fasting in children". Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 52 (5): 361–72. doi:10.3109/00365519209088371. PMID1514015.
^Makino Y, Sugiura T, Ito T, Sugiyama N, Koyama N (September 2007). "Carnitine-associated encephalopathy caused by long-term treatment with an antibiotic containing pivalic acid". Pediatrics. 120 (3): e739–41. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0339. PMID17724113.
^Graninger W (October 2003). "Pivmecillinam—therapy of choice for urinary tract infection". Int J Antimicrob Agents. 22. Suppl 2: 73–8. doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00235-8. PMID14527775.
^Tanphaichitra D, Srimuang S, Chiaprasittigul P, Menday P, Christensen OE (1984). "The combination of pivmecillinam and pivampicillin in the treatment of enteric fever". Infection. 12 (6): 381–3. doi:10.1007/BF01645219. PMID6569851.
