The United States Constitution is silent on the subject of political parties. The Founding Fathers did not originally intend for American politics to be partisan. In Federalist Papers No. 9 and No. 10, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, respectively, wrote specifically about the dangers of domestic political factions. In addition, the first President of the United States, George Washington, was not a member of any political party at the time of his election or throughout his tenure as president.[1] Furthermore, he hoped that political parties would not be formed, fearing conflict and stagnation, as outlined in his Farewell Address.[2]
Generally, the political history of America can be divided into five hegemonic eras, which can be further divided into seven party systems which each follow a realignment. The political hegemonic eras are:
1789[a]–1801: Federalist Era, dominated by the liberal-leaning Federalists, and their predecessors the Pro-Administration Faction, both based in the Northern United States. Pro-Administration Faction/Federalists have the full trifecta of government (they control the House and Senate in Congress and the Presidency) for 8 years of this period, while government was divided (between the House and Senate in Congress and/or the Presidency) for 4 years.
1801[b][c]–1861: Democratic Era, dominated by the conservative-leaning Democrats, and their predecessors the Democratic-Republicans, both based in the Southern United States to non-coastal North. Democratic-Republicans/Democrats have the full trifecta of government for 38.5 years of this period, government was divided for 20.5 years[d], and Whigs had a trifecta for 1 year.
1861[e]–1933: Republican Era, dominated by socially liberal, economically conservative Republicans based in New England and the Great Lakes Region (and later the greater Rust Belt region and the Midwestern United States). Republicans have the full trifecta of government for 36–40 years[f] of this period (depending on the inclusion of Andrew Johnson's term[g] and the 1881-83 Senate term[h]), government was divided for 24–28 years[i], and Democrats had a trifecta for 8 years[j].
1933[k]–1969: New Deal Democratic Era, dominated by a coalition of socially conservative Dems based in the South and economically progressive Dems based in the greater Rust Belt region, the Sun Belt and the West Coast of the United States. This marks the beginning of the "party switch" – liberals in the North and Urban Cities slowly flip Democratic. Democrats have the full trifecta of government for 26 years, government was divided for 8 years[l], and Republicans had a trifecta for 2 years[m].
1969[o]–Present: Divided Government Era, where the Federal Government is commonly divided (between Presidency and/or Congress) between liberal Democrats based in the North and West Coast & conservative Republicans based in the Midwest and South. This marks the finalization of the "party switch" – conservatives in the South and Rurals slowly flip Republican. As of November 2024, divided government has occurred for 40 years of this period[p], Democrats had a trifecta for 10 years[q], and Republicans held a trifecta for 6 years.
The seven party systems and their realignments which take place within these hegemonic eras are described in detail below:
First Party System: Federalist & Democrat Hegemony
Ironically, Hamilton and Madison wrote the Federalist Papers against political factions, but ended up being the core leaders in this emerging party system. Although distasteful to the participants, by the time John Adams and Thomas Jefferson ran for president in 1796, partisanship in the United States came to being.[5][6]
The disastrous Panic of 1819 and the Supreme Court's McCulloch v. Maryland reanimated the disputes over the supremacy of state sovereignty and federal power, between strict construction of the US Constitution and loose construction.[7] The Missouri Crisis in 1820 made the explosive political conflict between slave and free soil open and explicit.[8] Only through the adroit handling of the legislation by Speaker of the House Henry Clay was a settlement reached and disunion avoided.[9][10][11]
With the decline in political consensus, it became imperative to revive Jeffersonian principles on the basis of Southern exceptionalism.[12][13] The agrarian alliance, North and South, would be revived to form Jacksonian Nationalism and the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party.[14][15] As a result, the Democratic-Republican Party split into a Jacksonian faction that was regionally and ideologically identical to the original party, which became the modern Democratic Party in the 1830s, and a Henry Clay faction that regionally and ideologically resembled the old Federalist Party, which was absorbed by Clay's Whig Party.[citation needed] The term "Jacksonian democracy" was in active use by the 1830s.[16]
Many historians and political scientists use "Second Party System" to describe American politics between the mid-1820s until the mid-1850s. The system was demonstrated by rapidly rising levels of voter interest (with high election day turnouts), rallies, partisan newspapers, and high degrees of personal loyalty to parties.[17][18] It was in full swing with the 1828 United States presidential election, since the Federalists shrank to a few isolated strongholds and the Democratic-Republicans lost unity during the buildup to the American Civil War. describe the operating in the United States.[19]
This party system marked the first in a series of political realignments, a process in which a prominent third party coalition, often one that wins >10% of the popular vote in multiple states in a presidential election, realigns into one of the major parties, allowing that major party to dominate the federal government and/or presidency for the following decades. The first and most significant Second Party System realignment was a realignment of the differing factions of the Democratic-Republican Party of the South and non-coastal North, particularly those factions that voted for Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay and William H. Crawford, into the new Jacksonian/Democratic Party.
The opposition, leftover Federalist-aligned voters who formed the Clay and Adams factions in the Coastal North, realigned into the National Republican Party in 1828. This northern base, alongside the wealthy slave owners of the Southern slave centers and the Anti-Masons in Vermont, Massachusetts, Northern New York state and Southern Pennsylvania, realigned into the newly formed Whig Party in 1836. With the fall of the Whig Party in 1856, the remaining Whig coalition (those not effected by the Free Soil movement in New England and the Great Lakes Region) realigned into the Know Nothing ticket that same year then realigned into the Constitutional Union Party in 1860 at the start of the next party system.
The Jacksonian Democrats led by Andrew Jackson. The Jacksonian Democrats stood for the "sovereignty of the people" as expressed in popular demonstrations, constitutional conventions, and majority rule as a general principle of governing,
The Whig Party, assembled by Henry Clay from the National Republicans and from other opponents of Jackson. Whigs advocated the rule of law, written and unchanging constitutions, and protections for minority interests against majority tyranny.[20]
After taking office in 1829, President Andrew Jackson restructured a number of federal institutions. Jackson's professed philosophy became the nation's dominant political worldview for the remainder of the 1830s, helping his vice president (Martin Van Buren) secure election in the presidential election of 1836. In the presidential election of 1840, the "Whig Party" had its first national victory with the election of General William Henry Harrison, but he died shortly after assuming office in 1841. John Tyler (a self-proclaimed "Democrat") succeeded Harrison, as the first Vice President of the United States to ascend to the presidency via death of the incumbent.
The "Third Party System" refers to the period which came into focus in the 1850s (during the leadup to the American Civil War) and ended in the 1890s. The issues of focus during this time: Slavery, the civil war, Reconstruction, race, and monetary issues.
It was dominated by the new Republican Party, which claimed success in saving the Union, abolishing slavery and enfranchising the freedmen, while adopting many Whig-style modernization programs such as national banks, railroads, high tariffs, homesteads, social spending (such as on greater Civil War veteran pension funding), and aid to land grant colleges. While most elections from 1876 through 1892 were extremely close, the opposition Democrats won only the 1884 and 1892 presidential elections (the Democrats also won the popular vote in the 1876 and 1888 presidential elections, but lost the electoral college vote), although from 1875 to 1895 the party usually controlled the United States House of Representatives and controlled the United States Senate from 1879 to 1881 and 1893–1895. Indeed, scholarally work and electoral evidence emphasizes that after the 1876 election the South’s former slave centers, which before the emancipation of Republican-voting African Americans was electorally dominated by voting wealthy slave owners who made up the southern base of Whigs, Know Nothings and Constitutional Unionists, realigned into the Democratic Party due to the end of Reconstruction; this new electoral base for the Democrats would finish realigning around 1904. The overall national support for Reconstruction collapsed around 1876 as well.[21] The northern and western states were largely Republican, except for the closely balanced New York, Indiana, New Jersey, and Connecticut. After 1876, the Democrats took control of the "Solid South".[22]
Historians and political scientists generally believe that the Third Party System ended in the mid-1890s, which featured profound developments in issues of American nationalism, modernization, and race. This period, the later part of which is often termed the Gilded Age, is defined by its contrast with the preceding and following eras.
The "Fourth Party System" is the term used in political science and history for the period in American political history from the mid-1890s to the early 1930s, It was dominated by the Republican Party, excepting when 1912 split in which Democrats (led by President Woodrow Wilson) held the White House for eight years. American history texts usually call the period the Progressive Era. The concept was introduced under the name "System of 1896" by E. E. Schattschneider in 1960, and the numbering scheme was added by political scientists in the mid-1960s.[23]
The realignments that marked the beginning of the Fourth Party System was that of the Greenback Party, which dominated the greater Rust Belt region (which included upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Baltimore), into the GOP after 1896, and the realignment of their ideological successor the Populist Party, which dominated the Midwest, into the Republican Party after the 1900 and 1904 elections.
The central domestic issues concerned government regulation of railroads and large corporations ("trusts"), the money issue (gold versus silver), the protective tariff, the role of labor unions, child labor, the need for a new banking system, corruption in party politics, primary elections, the introduction of the federal income tax, direct election of senators, racial segregation, efficiency in government, women's suffrage, and control of immigration. Foreign policy centered on the 1898 Spanish–American War, Imperialism, the Mexican Revolution, World War I, and the creation of the League of Nations. Dominant personalities included presidents William McKinley (R), Theodore Roosevelt (R), and Woodrow Wilson (D), three-time presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan (D), and Wisconsin's progressive Republican Robert M. La Follette, Sr.
The Fifth Party System describes a period in American history from the 1930s to late 1960s or 1980s in which progressives in the North and conservative Democrats in the South joined a broad coalition called the "New Deal Coalition" to share control of government over the more business-aligned Republican Party, particularly as a result of the Republican Party's failure to contain the Great Depression while in power in the early 1930s.
The Fifth Party System began as a result of a realignment of the Progressive Party of the Western Coast and the greater Rust Belt region (which includes New York, Massachusetts, Baltimore and New Jersey), and a realignment of the Socialist Party of the Western Coast and Sun Belt, into the otherwise conservative Democratic Party after the 1932 and 1936 elections.
Because there has been no significant change of hands in Congress since the beginning of the Fifth Party System, historians have trouble placing dates and specifications for the modern party systems that succeed this one.
Later systems: Divided Government Era
The later party systems (with periods indicated in parentheses) include:
Sixth Party System (1968 or 1980–2008?), known for the period in which Republicans used the "Southern strategy" to realign Dixiecrats from the South into the party, which began in 1964 and finalized in 1984. This allowed the party to gain dominant control of the Presidency after 1968 or 1980, and dominant control of Congress after the 1994 Republican Revolution. This party system is heavily dominated by ticket-splitting.
Seventh Party System (2008?-present), a party system led by the realignment of Centrist Independent voters from the North and West who supported John B. Anderson and Ross Perot into the Democratic Party from 1996-2008, allowing the Democrats to gain dominant control of the Presidency. This party system is heavily dominated by polarization.
^When Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson began his Presidency in March 1801 the Senate held a two-day special Senate session with an ongoing Federalist majority, which briefly stalled the inauguration of the first Democratic-Republican trifecta government, though the session was only called by outgoing President John Adams so that the Senate could provide advice to the new President.[3][4] By the time the Congress began its first regular session in December 1801 to start official business the Democratic-Republicans had gained the Senate majority and thus, with the House and with President Jefferson, held the full trifecta of government throughout that first session, for the remaining 8 years of Jefferson’s presidency, and for the next several years.
^Includes one year when National Republicans held the Senate in the first Congressional session before Jacksonians flipped the Senate before the start of the second Congressional session (1835-36); includes two years when Democrats held the House with a plurality (1849-1851); includes two years in which parties opposed to the Democrats held the House through a coalition (1855-57); includes two years when the Republicans controlled the House through a coalition with other Opposition parties (1859-61).
^Includes two years when Republicans held the House through a coalition with Unconditional Unionists (1863-65); includes two years when Republicans controlled the Senate through a plurality (1897-99); includes two years when Republicans controlled a trifecta through a VP-tie-breaking majority that began in the second week of the first session of Congress (1927-29).
^While President Andrew Johnson, elected through the Republican-aligned National Union Party after formerly being a War Democrat, and the Republican Congress were on good terms and cooperated the first few years of his presidency, the relationship grew increasingly strained due to Johnson's disagreements with Radical Republicans over the nature of Reconstruction. After the midterms, Congress would substantially break with Johnson and begin their first attempt at impeachment against him in January 1867, by which point Johnson's practical trifecta was gone.
^When the Congressional term of 1881-83 began with a special Senate session starting March 1881, the Republicans held the Senate (and a trifecta) through the tie-breaking Vice President Arthur and through a caucus that included a Readjuster Senator. When both Republican New York senators resigned on May 16 of that year, the Republicans lost control of the Senate and lost their trifecta, and the Senate ended their special session. By the time the Senate reconvened for a second special Senate session in October 1881 with two new Republican New York senators, Vice President Arthur had succeeded to the Presidency and the Senate deadlocked. For the rest of the special session and for the remaining two regular Congressional sessions, the Senate decided to give Republicans the important role of controlling the Senate committees, give the Democrat-caucusing Independent the mostly ceremonial role of president pro tempore, and leave the patronage appointments and other Senate office appointments to the Democrats.)
^Includes two years when Republicans controlled the Senate through a plurality (1895-97); includes two years when Republicans controlled the Senate through a VP-tie-breaking majority and when Democrats gained the House majority before the first Congressional session (1931-33).
^Includes two year when Democrats controlled the Senate through a plurality (1893-95); includes two years in which Democrats held the House through a coalition with Progressive members and a Socialist member (1917-19).
^Includes one year when Democrats controlled the Senate through a caucus with an Independent, before the independent joined the Democratic Party (1955).
^Includes two years when Republicans controlled the Senate in the first Congressional session through a VP-tie-breaking majority then controlled the Senate in the second Congressional session through a VP-tie-breaking majority that included a caucus with an Independent (1953-54).
^New York and California were Nixon’s home states during his Presidency, though his primary home state was California where he was born and served as Senator.
^The Providence (Rhode Island) Patriot August 25, 1839, stated: "The state of things in Kentucky..is quite as favorable to the cause of Jacksonian democracy." cited in "Jacksonian democracy", Oxford English Dictionary (2019)
^William G. Shade, "The Second Party System" in Paul Kleppner, et al. Evolution of American Electoral Systems (1983) pp 77–112.
^
Frank Towers, "Mobtown's Impact on the Study of Urban Politics in the Early Republic.". Maryland Historical Magazine 107 (Winter 2012) pp: 469–75, p 472, citing Robert E, Shalhope, The Baltimore Bank Riot: Political Upheaval in Antebellum Maryland (2009) p. 147
^James E. Campbell, "Party Systems and Realignments in the United States, 1868–2004," Social Science History Fall 2006, Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 359–86
^To cite a standard political science college textbook: "Scholars generally agree that realignment theory identifies five distinct party systems with the following approximate dates and major parties: 1. 1796–1816, First Party System: Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists; 2. 1840–1856, Second Party System: Democrats and Whigs; 3. 1860–1896, Third Party System: Republicans and Democrats; 4. 1896–1932, Fourth Party System: Republicans and Democrats; 5. 1932–, Fifth Party System: Democrats and Republicans." Robert C. Benedict, Matthew J. Burbank and Ronald J. Hrebenar, Political Parties, Interest Groups and Political Campaigns. Westview Press. 1999. Page 11.
Further reading
Brown, Richard H. (1970). "The Missouri Crisis, Slavery, and the Politics of Jacksonianism". South Atlantic Quarterly: 55–72. Cited in Gatell, Frank Otto, ed. (1970). Essays on Jacksonian America. New York City: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, David (Fall 1999). Jeffersonian Ideology And The Second Party System. Vol. 62. pp. 17–44. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)