A quadratic integer is an algebraic integer of degree two. More explicitly, it is a complex number, which solves an equation of the form x2 + bx + c = 0, with b and cintegers. Each quadratic integer that is not an integer is not rational – namely, it's a real irrational number if b2 − 4c > 0 and non-real if b2 − 4c < 0 – and lies in a uniquely determined quadratic field, the extension of generated by the square root of the unique square-free integerD that satisfies b2 − 4c = De2 for some integer e. If D is positive, the quadratic integer is real. If D < 0, it is imaginary (that is, complex and non-real).
The quadratic integers (including the ordinary integers) that belong to a quadratic field form an integral domain called the ring of integers of
Although the quadratic integers belonging to a given quadratic field form a ring, the set of all quadratic integers is not a ring because it is not closed under addition or multiplication. For example, and are quadratic integers, but and are not, as their minimal polynomials have degree four.
Explicit representation
Here and in the following, the quadratic integers that are considered belong to a quadratic field where D is a square-free integer. This does not restrict the generality, as the equality (for any positive integer a) implies
An element x of is a quadratic integer if and only if there are two integers a and b such that either
In other words, every quadratic integer may be written a + ωb, where a and b are integers, and where ω is defined by
(as D has been supposed square-free the case is impossible, since it would imply that D is divisible by the square 4).[3]
Norm and conjugation
A quadratic integer in may be written
,
where a and b are either both integers, or, only if D ≡ 1 (mod 4), both halves of odd integers. The norm of such a quadratic integer is
.
The norm of a quadratic integer is always an integer. If D < 0, the norm of a quadratic integer is the square of its absolute value as a complex number (this is false if ). The norm is a completely multiplicative function, which means that the norm of a product of quadratic integers is always the product of their norms.
Every quadratic integer has a conjugate
.
A quadratic integer has the same norm as its conjugate, and this norm is the product of the quadratic integer and its conjugate. The conjugate of a sum or a product of quadratic integers is the sum or the product (respectively) of the conjugates. This means that the conjugation is an automorphism of the ring of the integers of – see § Quadratic integer rings, below.
Quadratic integer rings
Every square-free integer (different from 0 and 1) D defines a quadratic integer ring, which is the integral domain consisting of the algebraic integers contained in It is the set where if D = 4k + 1, and ω = √D otherwise. It is often denoted , because it is the ring of integers of , which is the integral closure of in The ring consists of all roots of all equations x2 + Bx + C = 0 whose discriminantB2 − 4C is the product of D by the square of an integer. In particular √D belongs to , being a root of the equation x2 − D = 0, which has 4D as its discriminant.
The square root of any integer is a quadratic integer, as every integer can be written n = m2D, where D is a square-free integer, and its square root is a root of x2 − m2D = 0.
The fundamental theorem of arithmetic is not true in many rings of quadratic integers. However, there is a unique factorization for ideals, which is expressed by the fact that every ring of algebraic integers is a Dedekind domain. Being the simplest examples of algebraic integers, quadratic integers are commonly the starting examples of most studies of algebraic number theory.[4]
The quadratic integer rings divide in two classes depending on the sign of D. If D > 0, all elements of are real, and the ring is a real quadratic integer ring. If D < 0, the only real elements of are the ordinary integers, and the ring is a complex quadratic integer ring.
For real quadratic integer rings, the class number – which measures the failure of unique factorization – is given in OEIS A003649; for the imaginary case, they are given in OEIS A000924.
Units
A quadratic integer is a unit in the ring of the integers of if and only if its norm is 1 or −1. In the first case its multiplicative inverse is its conjugate. It is the negation of its conjugate in the second case.
If D < 0, the ring of the integers of has at most six units. In the case of the Gaussian integers (D = −1), the four units are . In the case of the Eisenstein integers (D = −3), the six units are . For all other negative D, there are only two units, which are 1 and −1.
If D > 0, the ring of the integers of has infinitely many units that are equal to ± ui, where i is an arbitrary integer, and u is a particular unit called a fundamental unit. Given a fundamental unit u, there are three other fundamental units, its conjugate and also and Commonly, one calls "the fundamental unit" the unique one which has an absolute value greater than 1 (as a real number). It is the unique fundamental unit that may be written as a + b√D, with a and b positive (integers or halves of integers).
The fundamental units for the 10 smallest positive square-free D are , , (the golden ratio), , , , , , , . For larger D, the coefficients of the fundamental unit may be very large. For example, for D = 19, 31, 43, the fundamental units are respectively , and .
Examples of complex quadratic integer rings
For D < 0, ω is a complex (imaginary or otherwise non-real) number. Therefore, it is natural to treat a quadratic integer ring as a set of algebraic complex numbers.
A classic example is , the Gaussian integers, which was introduced by Carl Gauss around 1800 to state his biquadratic reciprocity law.[5]
Both rings mentioned above are rings of integers of cyclotomic fieldsQ(ζ4) and Q(ζ3) correspondingly.
In contrast, Z[√−3] is not even a Dedekind domain.
The factors 3, and are irreducible, as they have all a norm of 9, and if they were not irreducible, they would have a factor of norm 3, which is impossible, the norm of an element different of ±1 being at least 4. Thus the factorization of 9 into irreducible factors is not unique.
The ideals and are not principal, as a simple computation shows that their product is the ideal generated by 3, and, if they were principal, this would imply that 3 would not be irreducible.
Examples of real quadratic integer rings
For D > 0, ω is a positive irrational real number, and the corresponding quadratic integer ring is a set of algebraic real numbers. The solutions of the Pell's equationX 2 − DY 2 = 1, a Diophantine equation that has been widely studied, are the units of these rings, for D ≡ 2, 3 (mod 4).
Indian mathematician Brahmagupta treated the Pell's equation X2 − 61Y2 = 1, corresponding to the ring is Z[√61]. Some results were presented to European community by Pierre Fermat in 1657.[which?]
There are many known positive integers D > 0, for which the ring of quadratic integers is a principal ideal ring. However, the complete list is not known; it is not even known if the number of these principal ideal rings is finite or not.
When a ring of quadratic integers is a principal ideal domain, it is interesting to know whether it is a Euclidean domain. This problem has been completely solved as follows.
Equipped with the norm
as a Euclidean function,
is a Euclidean domain for negative D when
D = 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, 29, 33, 37, 41, 57, 73 (sequence A048981 in the OEIS).
There is no other ring of quadratic integers that is Euclidean with the norm as a Euclidean function.[8]
For negative D, a ring of quadratic integers is Euclidean if and only if the norm is a Euclidean function for it. It follows that, for
D = −19, −43, −67, −163,
the four corresponding rings of quadratic integers are among the rare known examples of principal ideal domains that are not Euclidean domains.
On the other hand, the generalized Riemann hypothesis implies that a ring of real quadratic integers that is a principal ideal domain is also a Euclidean domain for some Euclidean function, which can indeed differ from the usual norm.[9]
The values D = 14, 69 were the first for which the ring of quadratic integers was proven to be Euclidean, but not norm-Euclidean.[10][11]