The ranchos of Los Angeles County were large-scale land grants made by the governments of Spain and Mexico between 1784 and July 7, 1846, to private individuals within the current boundary lines (last adjusted in 1919) of Los Angeles County in California, United States.
The earliest colonial land grants called ranchos were established by the Commandancy and General Captaincy of the Internal Provinces of the Spanish Empire's Viceroyalty of New Spain. The Spanish colonial authorities of Alta California also established four presidios, three pueblos, and 20 Catholic missions.[a]Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo first claimed California for Spain in 1542 but until 1784 there were no land grants to Spanish subjects, except for small plots within pueblos, the balance of land in Spain's possession "being held for the benefit of the king."[1] The rancho period of California—land grants specifically to individuals outside of misiones and presidios—began in 1784, in what would become L.A. County, with vast grants to three Spanish military veterans.[2][3] All three were grants of traditional Tongva lands.[4] The greater portion of the rancho grants were created under Mexican dominion, which began with independence from Spain on September 27, 1821, and—according to the U.S. Land Commission—ended amidst the Mexican–American War on July 7, 1846. (Grants made after that date were deemed invalid.)[5] As the first Spanish land grants were made in Los Angeles County, the last Mexican land grant ever made was also in Los Angeles County: the Santa Catalina Island grant was made on July 4, 1846.[6]
Mission San Fernando Rey de España, Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, and El Pueblo de Los Ángeles lay within the current boundaries of Los Angeles County. Mission San Gabriel was founded in 1771 under Charles III of Spain; its lands were confiscated in 1833 under the Mexican secularization act, which was passed to protect nascent nation-state of Mexico from the influence of the Roman Catholic Church, which was perceived to be an ally of Spain. A land patent application made by Archbishop of San FranciscoJoseph Sadoc Alemany on behalf of the church was confirmed for 191 acres (77 ha; 0.298 sq mi; 0.77 km2) in 1859. Mission San Fernando was established 1797 under Charles IV of Spain and similarly had its lands confiscated in 1833. A land claim of 77 acres (31 ha; 0.120 sq mi; 0.31 km2) for Mission San Fernando was approved and patented in 1865.[5] In 1875, the City of Los Angeles patented a little more than 17,000 acres of land that had been granted to the pobladores. There were a handful of other, smaller land grants[b] made by Mexican authorities that were patented under the U.S. land law but that are not traditionally identified as ranchos. For example, "tract of land 1000 varas square near Mission San Gabriel" (patented to Mr. Sexton in 1871) was one of 10 such small grants near that mission, ranging in size from 19–180 acres (7.7–72.8 ha).[5]
In the decades following the initial grants, many of the ranches listed were further subdivided. Rancho Los Nietos, for example, was partitioned and re-granted as Rancho Los Alamitos, Rancho Los Cerritos, Rancho Los Coyotes, Rancho Las Bolsas, and Rancho Santa Gertrudes. A couple of the ranches that were patented under the U.S. system were conglomerates of originally smaller ranches—notably, Rancho Guaspita and Rancho Salinas became Sausal Redondo.[7][8] (Additionally, at least two sets of patented rancho land grants in Los Angeles County had overlapping areas; these disputes were eventually resolved in federal court.)[3]
Diseños are hand-drawn maps submitted to the U.S. government indicating the extent of a land grant as understood by the grantees.[9]Diseños and expedientes (written descriptions of the grants) were used during the U.S. land-patent process that began when Mexican Alta California became the U.S. state of California in 1850.[9]Diseños are distinct from later maps produced by U.S. surveyors within the extant American rectangular survey system.[9] Several of the earliest surveys, or plats, of Los Angeles-area ranchos were done by Henry Hancock, who himself owned Rancho La Brea and through his son is a namesake of the Hancock Park neighborhood. As for the cattle brands, many of the large ranchos had multiple brands for various herds or during various eras; the single one included here is the earliest known example.[10] Land patents were ultimately granted to over 60 Mexican, Anglo and indigenous Angelenos; the indigenous contingent was represented by Doña Victoria Reid of Rancho Huerta de Cuati, who was Gabrieleño Tongva, and Odón Chihuya, Urbano Chari, and Manuel (later Espíritu Chijulla) of Rancho El Escorpión, who were from a leading family of Fernandeño Tongva.[3] The largest confirmed grant was Ex-Mission San Fernando, the smallest was San Gabriel Mission.[6]
The ranchos had three main elements: the rancho buildings, including the residential hacienda that was often originally made of adobe brick; the adjacent market gardens and vineyards; and, last but not least, a vast pasturage for cattle, the hides and meat of which were the major economic products of the ranchos.[11]
List
Following the conventions of the California Land Commission records, the default alphabetization of this list begins after the Spanish-languagearticles (el, la, las, los) and prepositions (de, del), so Rancho Los Encinos is sorted by the E in Encinos, Rancho de los Palos Verdes is sorted by the P in Palos, etc. The grants were originally measured in leguas (Spanish leagues) and varas (yards), two Spanish customary units.
Grant patented by U.S. land commission and district courts
Grant either not claimed (due to sale, abandonment, amalgamation, subdivision, et al.) or not recognized during U.S. era
Spanish; la ciénega meaning wetland, marsh, or muddy place; paso is pass or passage; la tijera apparently has several definitions: scissors, an X-shaped tool, a person who shears animals, and channel or drain
Uncertain; huerta is orchard or kitchen garden in Spanish but the meaning of cuati in this context is unknown, although it is a word in Nahuatl, which is in the same language family as Tongva
Juan Ballesteros (Claim of A. Lestrada was rejected.)
Mexico
Spanish; wild roses grew here;[25] the ranch is named for Castile roses, the plants were likely one of the nine recognized species of roses native to California,[26] such as Rosa californica
Spanish; el sauzal is willow grove, describing Baccharis salicifolia, California seep willow; redondo is literally round, but here refers to a pasturage
Rancho Santa Elena, see also Rancho Gauspita and Rancho Salinas
Named for figure of religious significance; originally Nuestra Señora la Reina de las Vírgenes, a Spanish-languagehonorific for Mary, mother of Jesus, meaning Our Lady, the Queen of the Virgins
By the 20th century, the popular culture of California often depicted romantic rancheros and idealized missions, but erased the negative consequences for indigenous people of the California mission clash of cultures.[34]Mission Revival (1890–1915), Spanish Colonial Revival (1915–1935), Monterey Colonial Revival and California Churrigueresque were all popular architectural styles in Los Angeles,[35][36] and not coincidentally: "Thanks to architects, writers, and city boosters, Southern California's identity became firmly grounded in an obsession with geography."[37] The appropriation of Spanish colonization by bourgeois whites[37] is typified by projects like Christine Sterling's preservation of Ávila Adobe and establishment of Olvera Street as a tourist attraction.[38] The eventual design shift from adobe-style buildings to the "Mediterranean" style was an intentional separation from the rustic and Mexican roots of the place to what was perceived as a more sophisticated cultural iconography,[37] although "California stucco" was a method for attaching the "Mexican–Indian mode of domestic architecture" to mass production of small family homes.[39] The "romance of the ranchos" was also used as a pretext for discouraging urban density of Los Angeles and promoting a vast decentralized "rural urban" development style that combines vast tracts of single family homes and practices like faux-rural horse-keeping with dense nodes of finance, law and film production.[40]
^"Ramon Tiburcio" and "Roque" are the listed claimants of Encino on the index of expedientes held by the National Archives.
^Rancho San José was patented in two sections, one titled to Dalton-Palomares & Véjar, and a smaller one labeled "Addition" just to Dalton-Palomares.[5]
^The Rancho San Pedro grant was made sometime before October 20, 1784 and regranted in 1820, less Palos Verdes.
^Rancho Santa Gertrudes was patented in two parts, the smaller to Colima and the larger to McFarland & Downey.[5]
^Fogelson, Robert Michael (1993) [1967]. The fragmented metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850–1930. Classics in urban history. Berkeley: University of California press. location 358 of 4935. ISBN978-0-520-08230-4.
^Title Insurance and Trust and C.C. Pierce Photography Collection 1860-1960; California Historical Society (CHS); University of Southern California (USC) Libraries. "Brands of the California ranches, ca.1840-1900". USC Digital Libraries. Archived from the original on September 24, 2022. Retrieved April 2, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
^"Azusa History". City of Azusa, CA - Official Website. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
^Ertter, Barbara (2001). "Native California Roses". The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, Calif.: Jepson Arboretum. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
^"temazcalli". Nahuatl Dictionary (wired-humanities.org). Archived from the original on December 17, 2022. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^Guldimann, Suzanne. "By Any Other Name". Malibu Post. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^Applegate, Richard B. (December 1, 1974). "Chumash Placenames". The Journal of California Anthropology. 1 (2). Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved April 1, 2023.
^Nelson, Howard; Loesser, Cornelius; McMillian, Eugene; Reeves, Richard; Scott, Frank; Zierer, Paul (1964). "REMNANTS OF THE RANCHOS IN THE URBAN PATTERN OF THE LOS ANGELES AREA". The California Geographer: Journal of California Geographical Society. V: 1–11. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved March 29, 2023 – via CSUN ScholarWorks.