Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Rote Flora

Rote Flora
Rote Flora in 2017
Rote Flora in 2017
Map
Former namesTivoli Theatre
General information
StatusSquatted
TypeTheatre
LocationHamburg
Estimated completion1835
Opened1989 (squatted)
Known forself-managed social centre
Website
rote-flora.de
Building in 1996
Rote Flora in 1996
Building in 2014

The Rote Flora is a former theatre in the Sternschanze district of Hamburg, Germany. It has been squatted since November 1989 as a self-managed social centre. The collective said in 2001 "We are the 'UFO in the neighbourhood.' The black hole in public space. The City won't get rid of us because we are a part of what life is."

History of the building

The Flora theatre was constructed on Schulterblatt in 1835.[1] It was used for concerts, operettas, revues, and boxing matches. It became a variety theatre until it shut down after World War II. It was used as a cinema and then became a bargain store called 1000 Töpfe.[2]

In the late 1980s, local people were alarmed by the plans of Friedrich Kurz to gentrify the theatre by making it a venue for performances of The Phantom of the Opera, fearing it would attract tourists and change the area; they proposed to turn it into a community centre instead.[3] The alternative plans were ignored by the city and the rear of the building was demolished in April 1988. Sabotage attacks began on the construction site and bowing to the local pressure, the community was given a temporary lease to use the building. When the lease expired on 1 November 1989, the occupiers stayed and the building was squatted.[1] It was a week before the fall of the Berlin Wall and the new inhabitants said it was a "free space for realizing an autonomous life."[2] It has remained squatted ever since.[1]

Social centre

At the beginning the occupiers were very much focused on local struggles and as time went by, the Rote Flora has developed into a self-managed social centre connected to left-wing, anarchist activism, with links to similar projects in Amsterdam, Berlin and Copenhagen.[4] Its structures of internal organisation and self-governance can be compared to a form of radical sovereign self-rule.[5] The building provides a music venue, an infoshop, a social movement archive, a bar, a cafe, rehearsal rooms and a bicycle repair workshop. The Government of Hamburg offered to give the project a contract in the early 1990s but the offer was refused. Later, it decided to sell the building to a developer called Klausmartin Kretschmer for 370,000 DM, with the proviso that it would remain a social centre.[4] When a well-known neo-Nazi was given a social housing apartment in a block behind the project in the 1990s, Rote Flora organised demonstrations against his tenancy.[1]

The collective said in 2001 "We are the 'UFO in the neighbourhood.' The black hole in public space. The City won't get rid of us because we are a part of what life is."[6] Regarding the new owner, it said "We neither asked Kretschmer to buy the Flora almost nine years ago, nor are we in the slightest interested in his opinions about the political ideologies and the work of the Rote Flora".[6] The contract Kretschmer had signed with the city expired in 2011, the Rote Flora started a campaign of resistance called "Flora remains incompatible" (German: 'Flora bleibt unverträglich') to campaign against possible eviction.[7] The city offered him 1.1 million euros to buy back the building, but he requested 5 million euros. In December 2013, the city's decision to redevelop the Rote Flora site became the focus of large and sometimes violent demonstrations.[4][8] Ultimately, in mid-January 2014, the borough of Altona announced a change in plans for the site that would ensure the building would not be demolished and could remain a cultural centre.[8] Mayor Olaf Scholz agreed to pay Kretschmer 820,000 euros, whilst two security guards swore under oath that Kretschmer had wanted to pay them to burn the building down to get rid of it.[3][9] Later in 2014, the Rota Flora celebrated 25 years of existence.[9]

During the 2017 G20 Hamburg summit, the Rote Flora was a major hotspot and following riots in the Schanzeviertel rightwing commentators demanded that the Rote Flora be closed down.[10][11] The Rote Flora distanced itself from the rioters, with a spokesperson saying that "that a form of militancy was brought onto the streets which was intoxicated with itself, and we find that both politically and in terms of content wrong" ("dass hier eine Form von Militanz auf die Straße getragen wurde, die sich selbst berauscht hat und das finden wir politisch und inhaltlich falsch").[1] A former police officer who studies left-wing politics wrote that activists spend a lot of time maintaining and organising the Rote Flora, time which then takes them away from other political projects.[12]

As well as being a centre of left-wing activism, the Rote Flora has become a destination for alternative tourism, since the Schanzeviertel is gentrifying.[13] Rules posted at the door of the centre in 2018 state: "We will not tolerate any kind of sexism, racism, anti-Semitism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, lookism or any kind of boundary-crossing behaviour here."[11] The Rote Flora collective gave the building the address of Achidi-John Platz 1 to commemorate a man, Achidi John, who died in 2001 after being forced by police officers to swallow an emetic.[2][14]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Jones, A (2018). "'Militanz' and Moralised Violence: Hamburg's Roteflora and the 2017 G20 Riot". German Life and Letters. 71 (4): 529–558. doi:10.1111/glal.12212. S2CID 165309877. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  2. ^ a b c "The Rote Flora: the iconic Hamburg squat right-wingers call a danger to the nation". The Local. 11 July 2007. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  3. ^ a b Müllenberg, Wolf-Hendrik (19 November 2019). "Rote Flora: Aktivisten besetzen Hamburger Varietétheater". NDR (in German). Retrieved 22 January 2022.
  4. ^ a b c Birke, Peter (2014). "Autonome Sehenswürdigkeit. Die Rote Flora und die Hamburger Stadtentwicklung seit den späten 1980er Jahren [Autonomous Vision: The Rote Flora and Hamburg's urban development since the 1980s]". Sozial Geschichte Online. 13.
  5. ^ Jones, Ali (4 April 2024). "Spatial Sovereignties in Squatted 'Excess Spaces'". Antipode. doi:10.1111/anti.13042.
  6. ^ a b Naegler, Laura (2012). Gentrification and Resistance: Cultural Criminology, Control, and the Commodification of Urban Protest in Hamburg. Lit Verlag. ISBN 978-3643901149.
  7. ^ "English". Flora Bleibt. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  8. ^ a b "Hamburg: Rote Flora bleibt Kulturzentrum [Rote Flora remains a cultural centre]". Der Spiegel (in German). 18 January 2014. Retrieved 22 January 2022.
  9. ^ a b Twickel, Christoph; Braden, Benjamin; Jäschke, Martin (28 August 2014). "Rote Flora: 25 Jahre besetztes Kulturzentrum in Hamburg". Der Spiegel (in German). Retrieved 22 January 2022.
  10. ^ Wüllenweber, Walter (14 July 2017). "Macht kaputt, was uns kaputt macht! - Warum die Rote Flora weg muss". Stern (in German). Retrieved 22 January 2022.
  11. ^ a b Khandekar, Omkar (11 October 2018). "To the Barricades". Caravan Magazine. Retrieved 19 April 2019.
  12. ^ Bänninger, Mirja (2015). Berner Reitschule: Ein soziologischer Blick : Studie auf Anfrage des Gemeinderates der Stadt Bern (Erste Auflage ed.). Basel. p. 149. ISBN 978-3-906129-91-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  13. ^ Ba, Claudia; Frank, Sybille; Müller, Claus; Raschke, Anna Laura; Wellner, Kristin; Zecher, Annika (2021). The power of new urban tourism : policies, representations and contestations. Abingdon, Oxon. ISBN 9780367555399.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  14. ^ Volkmann-Schluck, Philip (30 April 2011). "Von Flora-Kreisläufen und Monarchie-Spektakeln". Abendblatt (in German). Retrieved 2 February 2022.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rote Flora.

53°33′43″N 9°57′41″E / 53.56199°N 9.96150°E / 53.56199; 9.96150

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya