Two Sart men and two Sart boys posed outside, in front of wall, in the early 20th century.
Sart is a name for the settled “Aryan” inhabitants of Central Asia. According to Great Soviet Encyclopedia, before the October Revolution of 1917, the name “Sart” was used in relation to the Uyghur and Uzbek merchants by Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and semi-nomadic Uzbeks.
Origin
There are several theories about the origin of the term. It may be derived from the Sanskritsārthavāha (सार्थवाह), meaning "merchant, trader, caravan leader", a term supposedly used by nomads to describe town-dwellers, according to Vasily Bartold, Gerard Clauson, and most recently Richard Foltz.[1][2]
The earliest known use of the term is in the 1070 Karakhanid Turkic text Kutadgu Bilig "Blessed Knowledge", in which it refers to the settled population of Kashgar.[citation needed] The term referred to all settled Muslims of Central Asia regardless of language.
In the post-Mongol period we find that Ali-Shir Nava'i refers to the Iranian people as Sart Ulusi ("Sart people"), and for him Sart tili ("Sart language") was a synonym for the Persian language. Similarly, when Babur refers to the people of Margilan as "Sarts", it is in distinction to the people of Andijan who are Turks, and it is clear that by this he means Persian-speakers. He also refers to the population of the towns and villages of the vilayat of Kabul as "Sarts".
Similarly, Babur wrote in the Baburnama in 1525, "In the country of Kābul there are many and various tribes. Its valleys and plains are inhabited by Tūrks, Aimāks, and Arabs. In the city and the greater part of the villages, the population consists of Tajiks (Sarts)."[4]
A further change of use seems to have occurred with the arrival in the oasis regions of Turkestan of the Taza ÖzbekPure Özbeks[5] under Muhammad Shaybani. They distinguished between themselves as semi-nomadic speakers of a Fergana Kipchak language and the settled Turkic-speaking populations already living in the oasis towns, most of whom spoke the Chagatai language, one of the Karluk languages. It is at this date that the distinction between the terms Sart and Tajik seems to have made itself felt, as previously they were often used interchangeably. Even after the Uzbeks switched to a settled way of life, they continued to maintain this distinction between Turkic-speakers who were members of one of the Uzbek tribes, and Sarts, who were not.
In June 2010, "Sart" was used in ethnic conflict between Kyrgyz and Uzbeks in southern Kyrgyzstan to distinguish the less East-Asiatic Uzbeks from Kyrgyz.[citation needed]
Throughout the Qing dynasty, the sedentary inhabitants of the oases around the Tarim speaking Karluk Turkic languages were still largely known as Taranchis or Sarts under the Mongol rulers of Khojan or Chagatai lineages. Other parts of the Muslim world knew this area as Moghulistan or as the eastern part of Turkestan, and the Qing generally lumped all of its Muslim subjects under the category of "Hui people" without distinguishing between Mandarin-speaking Dungans and ethnic groups speaking other languages such as the Taranchi, Sarts, Salars, Monguors, Bonans, etc. This is akin to the practice of Imperial Russia's lumping all Muslims connected to Ottoman or Muslim Chinggisid spheres as "Tatars".
In 1911, the Nationalist Chinese under the leadership of Sun Yat-sen overthrew Qing Dynasty rule and established the Republic of China.
By 1920, Jadidist Pan-Turkism challenged the Qing and Republican Chinese warlords controlling Xinjiang. Turpan poet Abdulxaliq, having spent his early years in Semey and the Jadidist intellectual centres in Uzbekistan, returned to Xinjiang with a pen name that he later styled as a surname: Uyghur. He adopted the name Uyghur from the Soviets, who gave that name to his ethnic group in 1921 at Tashkent. He wrote the famous nationalist poem "Oyghan", which opened with the line "Ey pekir Uyghur, oyghan!" (Hey poor Uyghur, wake up!). He was later executed by the Chinese warlordSheng Shicai in Turpan in March 1933 for inciting Uyghur nationalist sentiments through his works.
Modern meanings
Vasily Bartold argues that by the 19th century those described as "Sarts" had become much more Turkicised than had previously been the case. In the literature of Imperial Russia in the 19th century the term was sometimes used to denote the Turkic-speaking peoples of Ferghana, Tashkent, Shymkent and the southern Syr-Darya Oblast, also found in smaller numbers in Samarkand and the Emirate of Bukhara. "Sart" was also commonly employed by the Russians as a general term for all the settled natives of Turkestan. There was a great deal of debate over what this meant, and where the name came from. Barthold writes that "To the kazakh every member of a settled community was a Sart whether his language was Turkic or Iranian".
Nikolai Ostroumov was firm in his conviction that it was not an ethnic definition but an occupational one, and he backed this up by quoting some (apparently common) local sayings: "A bad Kyrgyz becomes a Sart, whilst a bad Sart becomes a Kyrgyz". This confusion reached its peak in the 1897 Russian Empire Census: the Fergana Oblast was held to have a very large Sart population, the neighbouring Samarkand Province very few but a great many Uzbeks. The distinction between the two was often far from clear.
Historically speaking the Sarts belonged to older settled groups, whereas the Uzbeks were descended from tribes which arrived in the region with Muhammad Shaybani in the 16th century. It seems that in Khwarazm at least, Uzbeks spoke a now-extinct Kipchak variety closer to Kazakh, while Sarts spoke a form of PersianisedChagatai Turkic. In Fergana, the Sarts spoke a Karluk variety that was very close to modern Uyghur and is believed to be the earlier, historical form of Uzbek.
In 1924 the Soviet regime decreed that henceforth all settled Turkic-speaking peoples in Central Asia (and many others who spoke Persian such as in Samarkand and Bukhara)[citation needed] would be known as "Uzbeks" and that the term "Sart" was to be abolished as an insulting legacy of colonial rule.[citation needed], even though Lenin himself used the term in his communiqués.
For the first few years, however, the language chosen by the Soviet authorities for the new Uzbek SSR was not the modern Uzbek that is found today, but the nomadic, less Persianized and quite exotic dialect of the city of Turkistan in what is now Kazakhstan.
The Uighurs are the people whom old Russian travellers called Sart (a name which they used for sedentary, Turkic-speaking Central Asians in general), while Western travellers called them Turki, in recognition of their language. The Chinese used to call them Ch'an-t'ou ('Turbaned Heads') but this term has been dropped, being considered derogatory, and the Chinese, using their own pronunciation, now called them Weiwuerh. As a matter of fact there was for centuries no 'national' name for them; people identified themselves with the oasis they came from, like Kashgar or Turfan."[6]
This proved itself to be largely incomprehensible to most inhabitants of the primary cities, from Tashkent to Bukhara. It was therefore replaced by the modern, fundamentally Persianized urban Uzbek, which is the only Turkic language without any vowel harmony.
It is thus very difficult to attach a single ethnic or even linguistic meaning to the term "Sart". Historically the various Turkic and Persian peoples of Central Asia were identified mostly by their lifestyle, rather than by any notional ethnic or even linguistic difference. The Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and Turkmens were nomads, herding across steppes, mountains and sand deserts, respectively. The settled Turks and Tajiks, on the other hand, were Sarts, as they either lived in cities such as Khiva, Bukhara, or Samarkand, or they lived in rural agricultural communities.
Use by the Dongxiang
The Muslim, Mongol-speaking Dongxiangs of Northwest China call themselves Sarta or Santa. It is not clear if there is any connection between this term and the Sarts of Central Asia.
Use in Siberia
Sart was one of the names applied to the Siberian Bukharans who settled in Siberia in the 17th century.
Footnotes
^Golden, Peter B. An Introduction to the History of Turkic Peoples (1992). p. 150
^Foltz, Richard A History of the Tajiks: Iranians of the East Note 27 for Chapter 4 [1]
Owen Lattimore. (1973) "Return to China's Northern Frontier." The Geographical Journal, Vol. 139, No. 2 (Jun., 1973), pp. 233–242.
Ostroumov, Nikolai Petrovich (1884), Значение Названия "Сарт", Tashkent{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Ostroumov, Nikolai Petrovich (1890), Сарты – Этнографические Материалы, Tashkent, p. 7{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Barthold, V V (1934), "Sart", Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol. 4 (S-Z), pp. 175–176
Barthold, W; Subtelny, Maria Eva (1997), "Sart", Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol. 9 (SAN-SZE), pp. 66–68
Breel, Yuri (1978), "The Sarts in the Khanate of Khiva", Journal of Asian History, vol. 12, Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz, pp. 121–151, ISSN0021-910X
Subtelny, Maria Eva (1998), "The Symbiosis of Turk and Tajik", in Manz, Beatrice (ed.), Central Asia in historical perspective, The John M. Olin critical issues series, Boulder CO USA: Westview Press (published 1994), ISBN0-8133-8801-5
Nava'i, Ali Shir; Devereaux, Robert (1966), Muhakamat al-Lughatayn, Leiden: Brill
Arat, Reşit Rahmeti (1947), Kutadgu bilig, Türk Dil Kurumu, vol. 87, Istanbul: Millî Eğitim Basımevi, p. 571
Ṭabīb, Rashīd al-Dīn; Thackston, Wheeler (1978), Rashiduddin Fazlullah's Jamiʻuʾt-tawarikh = Compendium of chronicles, Sources of Oriental languages and literatures, vol. 4, Cambridge MA USA: Harvard University, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, p. 78
