The organisation works with scientists and journalists to put scientific evidence in public discussions about science, and to correct unscientific misinformation.[5] They encourage and assist scientists to engage in public debates about their area of expertise, to respond to scientifically inaccurate claims in the media, to help people contact scientists with appropriate expertise, and to prepare briefings about the scientific background to issues of public concern.
Projects
Sense about Science publishes guides to different areas of science in partnership with experts. These include: Responsible Handover Framework,[6] Data Science: A Guide for Society,[7] Making Sense of Nuclear,[8] Making Sense of Uncertainty,[9] Making Sense of Allergies,[10] Making Sense of Drug Safety Science,[11] Making Sense of Testing, [12]Making Sense of Crime,[13] Making Sense of Statistics,[14] Making Sense of Screening[15] and Making Sense of GM.[16]
Sense about Science runs the Voice of Young Science programme to help early career scientists engage in public debates.
As of January 2018, the AllTrials petition has been signed by 91,989 people and 737 organisations.[23]
Ask for Evidence
Ask for Evidence was launched by Sense About Science in 2011. It is a campaign that helps people request for themselves the evidence behind news stories, marketing claims and policies.[20] When challenged in this way, organisations may withdraw their claims or send evidence to support them. The campaign is supported by more than 6000 volunteer scientists who are available to review the evidence provided and determine whether it supports the original claim or story.[24] The campaign has received funding from The Wellcome Trust[25] and is endorsed by figures such as Dara Ó Briain[26] and Derren Brown.[27]
Keep Libel Laws Out of Science
Sense About Science launched the Keep Libel Laws out of Science campaign in June 2009[28] in defence of a member of its board of trustees,[29] author and journalist Simon Singh, who has been sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association. They issued a statement entitled "The law has no place in scientific disputes",[30] which was signed by many people representing science, medicine, journalism, publishing, arts, humanities, entertainment, sceptics, campaign groups and law. In April 2010, the BCA lost this case[31] with the court accepting that criticism of the BCA concerning its promotion of bogus treatments was fair comment.
In December 2009, Sense About Science, Index on Censorship and English PEN launched the Libel Reform Campaign.[32] The Defamation Act 2013 received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013 and came into force on 1 January 2014.
The Trust actively campaigns in support of various causes. It has issued a statement signed by over 35 scientists[33] asking the WHO to condemn homeopathy for diseases such as HIV.[34]
Lord Taverne, chairman of Sense About Science, has criticised campaigns to ban plastic bags as counter-productive and being based on "bad science".[56]
Anti-genetic-modification campaigners and academics have criticised Sense About Science for what they view as a failure to disclose industry connections of some advisers,[57]
and Private Eye reported that it had seen a draft of the Making Sense of GM guide that included Monsanto Company's former director of scientific affairs as an author.[58]
Tracey Brown, managing director of Sense About Science, rebutted these claims on the Science about Science website.[59]
Homeopath Peter Fisher criticised Sense About Science, who have been working closely with NHS primary care trusts on the issue of funding for homeopathy, for being funded by the pharmaceutical industry; Sense About Science responded in a statement to Channel 4 News that "Peter Fisher's desperate comments show about as much grasp of reality as the homeopathic medicine he sells."[60]
^Ben Goldacre's BadScience.net "Sense About Science have very kindly given me the transcripts from their excellent Malaria and homeopathy sting from last month"