Template talk:Catholic Church sidebar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catholic Church sidebar template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Catholicism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles This template is supported by WikiProject Catholicism. Religion: Interfaith This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles This template is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I propose adding a border around the sidebar. At present, the template can blend into pages due to the fact that most of the content is concealed within collapsed lists and the template as a whole isn't that striking. It's mostly blank space (again due more than half of it consisting of collapsed lists). Adding a border around the edges would make the sidebar pop out more and clearly delineate it as separate and distinct from the article text. This is already done with {{Sidebar person}}. I have added this to the sandbox here. Ergo Sum 02:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-09-19T02:27:00.000Z","author":"Ergo Sum","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ergo_Sum-2018-09-19T02:27:00.000Z-Add_border_around_sidebar","replies":["c-Ergo_Sum-2018-09-28T14:05:00.000Z-Ergo_Sum-2018-09-19T02:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

Done. Ergo Sum 14:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-09-28T14:05:00.000Z","author":"Ergo Sum","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ergo_Sum-2018-09-28T14:05:00.000Z-Ergo_Sum-2018-09-19T02:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove "Catholic Church and Pandeism", which appears to place this alleged topic on a par with Islam and Judaism. 2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 23:33, 27 March 2019 (UTC) UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z","author":"2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26-2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z-Edit_request,_28_March_2019","replies":["c-Hyperbolick-2019-03-30T22:42:00.000Z-2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26-2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z","c-Newslinger-2019-03-31T09:33:00.000Z-2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26-2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Note, please, above IP is now blocked for misconduct. See Talk:Catholic Church and Pandeism for well-participated consensus this article is fine as it is. There is no sort of rule that everything in the template must be of equivalent importance. Next person could come along insisting the Judaism page be removed on the claim of Islam being more important under current demographics. We need more of these, not fewer. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-30T22:42:00.000Z","author":"Hyperbolick","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Hyperbolick-2019-03-30T22:42:00.000Z-2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26-2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

 Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. — Newslinger talk 09:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-03-31T09:33:00.000Z","author":"Newslinger","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Newslinger-2019-03-31T09:33:00.000Z-2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26-2019-03-27T23:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

There is no significance established for promoting these heresies to the same level as Judaism and Islam. The Catholic Church has no "relations" with deism or pandeism in particular; they are especially not notable enough to feature in a sidebar of limited space and scope. (Disclosure: I was the editor above known as "2600:8800:1880:FC:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26".) Elizium23 (talk) 23:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-02T23:46:00.000Z","author":"Elizium23","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:46:00.000Z-Deism_and_pandeism","replies":["c-Hyperbolick-2019-07-02T23:50:00.000Z-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Significant enough for the Church itself to write of its own efforts to crush Deism. Hyperbolick (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-02T23:50:00.000Z","author":"Hyperbolick","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Hyperbolick-2019-07-02T23:50:00.000Z-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:55:00.000Z-Hyperbolick-2019-07-02T23:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sure bruh... incidentally, notability is established by "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". If we're going to admit deism and pandeism to this sidebar, then let's open 'er up to the other "Catholic Church and..." articles: there's "health care", "Nazi Germany", "slavery", "Politics in the United States", "HIV/AIDS", "evolution", etc. Why stop at your pet projects alone? Elizium23 (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-02T23:55:00.000Z","author":"Elizium23","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:55:00.000Z-Hyperbolick-2019-07-02T23:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Hyperbolick-2019-07-03T00:01:00.000Z-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Absolutely, include all of them. Make the most informative collection of links possible. Hyperbolick (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-03T00:01:00.000Z","author":"Hyperbolick","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Hyperbolick-2019-07-03T00:01:00.000Z-Elizium23-2019-07-02T23:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Anti-Catholicism (Why would you add this content in a sidebar talking about Catholic Church?)

Other Philosophies (Total nonsense, Monasticism should be moved to Philosophy section amd I wonder why these editors fail to mention Scholasticism which is Catholic's mark of distiinction when compared to other sects notably Eastern orthodox.)

NOTE:

Some topics leads to Interfaith pages instead of Catholic view such as "Theotokos".

Should we add the 'controversies'? Also, some topics included in 'controversies' should not be considered controversy like the Church's view on evolution. IS EVOLUTION ACCEPTED ACCEPTED BY MAJORITY OF PEOPLE NOWADAYS? WHY WOULD YOU CALL IT CONTROVERSY? HOW STUPID IT IS. Royalistandlegitimist (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-04T04:15:00.000Z","author":"Royalistandlegitimist","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Royalistandlegitimist-2019-07-04T04:15:00.000Z-THE_TEMPLATE_IS_NOT_TOO_CATHOLIC_AND_ALSO,_THESE_TOPICS_IS_TOTAL_NONSENSE,_IN_SH","replies":[]}}-->