The definition of a Test differs from that of a Senior International Match, which is defined as a match which "has been sanctioned and recognised by IRL and the relevant national federations as a match played between Senior National Teams".[2]
Recognition
Members of the international governing body can make their own recognition of a match as having test status. It is possible for a match to be considered a test by one side but not the other. Matches may also be given test status retrospectively by their governing bodies.[3]
A notable instance of a different in opinions of the status of past matches is a consequence of the Super League war. The Australian Rugby League does not recognise the games played in 1997 by the Australian Super League side against Great Britain and New Zealand.[4] The three sides were representing members of the Super League International Board, the ARL's rival. The five matches, two against New Zealand (the inauguralAnzac Test and an end of season match) and a three test tour of England against Great Britain (Super League Test series) are recognised by the Rugby League International Federation, Rugby Football League and New Zealand Rugby League as tests.[5] There have been calls for the Super League Tests to be included in the ARL's records but ARL Chief Executive Geoff Carr said in 2010, "All historians, and the NRL, agree this is the way it should be treated".[4] ARL historian David Middleton has stated that those players who joined Super League did so in the knowledge that they were forfeiting their chance of representing the established national team.[4]
^RFL (January 2010), "Interpretation"(PDF), Memorandum & Articles of Association for RFL (Governing Body) Ltd, no. 8, Rugby Football League, p. 90, archived from the original(PDF) on 2010-07-31, retrieved 2010-07-30