User talk:PamD/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:PamD. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello,

please, could you take a look here? Greetings, --Mparu ∞ (msg) 18:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-07T18:46:00.000Z","author":"Mparu","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mparu-2011-02-07T18:46:00.000Z-Segugio_dell'Appennino","replies":[]}}-->

By the way, thanks for all the links and all for these last 3 articles. I feel like I have a persona guardian who watches over me. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-07T20:10:00.000Z","author":"History2007","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-History2007-2011-02-07T20:10:00.000Z-Thanks","replies":["c-Pdfpdf-2011-02-09T14:27:00.000Z-History2007-2011-02-07T20:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

Me too, and for a different set of articles. It is appreciated, and the finished product is much improved by it. Thanks! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-09T14:27:00.000Z","author":"Pdfpdf","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Pdfpdf-2011-02-09T14:27:00.000Z-History2007-2011-02-07T20:10:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Kind words much appreciated! I spend quite a bit of time stub-sorting, and tend to do more than just that while I've got the article up on screen if I can see other little improvements to make. PamD (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-09T19:33:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-09T19:33:00.000Z-Thanks","replies":[]}}-->

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

PamD, thank you again for those many, many edits that few people see but everyone benefits from. Drmies (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-11T16:56:00.000Z","author":"Drmies","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Drmies-2011-02-11T16:56:00.000Z-Speaking_of_thanks...","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-11T17:48:00.000Z-Drmies-2011-02-11T16:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

• That's kind of you - thanks! I just wikignome away, mostly stub-sorting and letting it lead me on to other wikification and so on. PamD (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-11T17:48:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-11T17:48:00.000Z-Drmies-2011-02-11T16:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi PamD - thanks for sorting that all out - most appreciated!--Shirt58 (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-12T11:05:00.000Z","author":"Shirt58","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shirt58-2011-02-12T11:05:00.000Z-About_Choi_Young-Il_and_Choi_Young-Il_-_thank_you!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello PamD, I've left you a message at User talk:Lavalamp from Mars#Boxford Primary School. Lavalamp from Mars (talk) 10:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-13T10:33:00.000Z","author":"Lavalamp from Mars","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Lavalamp_from_Mars-2011-02-13T10:33:00.000Z-Boxford_Primary_School","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at PPdd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

re TB Absurdity and RIdiculousness at my talk page. PPdd (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-13T17:21:00.000Z","author":"PPdd","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PPdd-2011-02-13T17:21:00.000Z-TB_Absurdity_and_RIdiculousness_at_my_talk_page","replies":[]}}-->

Hi! Out of curiosity, would you be open to considering a run at adminship? I would be interested in nominating you. --Strikerforce (talk) 11:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-14T11:29:00.000Z","author":"Strikerforce","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Strikerforce-2011-02-14T11:29:00.000Z-Administrator","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-14T12:10:00.000Z-Strikerforce-2011-02-14T11:29:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for the compliment. I wonder which of my edits have come to your notice? I've been asked a couple of times before to consider applying for adminship, but I still prefer not to - I can do almost everything I want to on Wikipedia without, and can avoid the angst and drama involved in WP:RfA and subsequent arguments! PamD (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-14T12:10:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-14T12:10:00.000Z-Strikerforce-2011-02-14T11:29:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

PS: Good luck with the ongoing attempts to give blood - I'm going for donation number 72 this afternoon. PamD (talk)

In an effort to turn our interactions more positive, I'd like to invite you to be a pro-active and productive member of the project! Perhaps you could make yourself a project leader and take on some component you find most important. To do this, simply sign up on our member page.

I'd very much like to make our interactions more productive and am interested in finding a positive way to do this.

Here's an idea: why don't you create a list of public art in the town you live or that your originally from, or that you just like. In your list, make it of all of things you think about how public art should or shouldn't be represented in Wikipedia:

Once you've done that, make articles for all of the artworks that fit your criteria of notability, or make one large article about all of the artworks in the city.

It would be great for others to see you as productive member of WikiProject Public Art, rather than one of the project's ongoing critic!

I worry that your approach will de-incentive others to get involved, especially since many of the members are new, and they don't like to get bit. --RichardMcCoy (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-01T18:44:00.000Z","author":"RichardMcCoy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-01T18:44:00.000Z-A_Change_to_Support?","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-02T08:59:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-01T18:44:00.000Z"]}}-->

Richard, I have no particular interest in public art (though I created one moderate-sized article in the field, The Boy with the Leaking Boot). I do a lot of Wiki-Gnome work, and while stub-sorting I first encountered your project. My interests are in the encyclopedia as a whole, and it is not obvious at present that the public art project sits happily within it. User:Johnbod has put it more fully. Please do not accuse me of harassment because I ask simple questions, query notability, discuss the current rule about italic titles, etc. No-one replied to my point at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Public_art#lead_sentence_.22Title_of_Artwork.2C_is_a_public_artwork_....22, except Johnbod to reiterate the question. You see my input as criticism and harassment: I see it as a serious question, perhaps reflecting questions about the overall contribution the project's articles make to the encyclopedia. All projects need input from editors who have broader interests, as well as from dedicated subject specialists. I am not sure that the Project's goals as set out at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Public_art are actually compatible with the goals of the encyclopedia. I will continue to make what edits and comments I wish to, in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, for the benefit of the encyclopedia. PamD (talk) 08:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T08:59:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-02T08:59:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-01T18:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-Johnbod-2011-02-02T14:04:00.000Z-PamD-2011-02-02T08:59:00.000Z"]}}-->

Quite so! Pam, I think you've seen the equivalent section on my talk page, but I'll link it in case not. I don't see the project as having fundamental problems sitting within WP, but as short on internal experience of wikiways in some areas, and much too hostile to outsiders. Johnbod (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T14:04:00.000Z","author":"Johnbod","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Johnbod-2011-02-02T14:04:00.000Z-PamD-2011-02-02T08:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-02T14:34:00.000Z-Johnbod-2011-02-02T14:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

Yes, I'd seen it, thanks. I worry about their viewpoint, that something "is a piece of public art" rather than being a sculpture / mural / etc. The question of scope seems important - do they include sculptures in/on/associated with churches/temples/etc, for example? What about art works created for public space (church(?), town hall, square, etc) and now in private hands? And of course vice versa - items created for a private owner in private space and now visible in a public space. How do sculptures in National Trust / English Heritage gardens, or privately-owned gardens like Blenheim Palace, fit in? Does something become public art when the garden is opened to the public (fee or free?) (regularly or once a year?)? I'm sure someone could draw up a spectrum of public-ness and draw a line, but I don't see it. And there are huge notability issues. One day an arch-deletionist will find the project and the fur will fly! The project seems to aim to use Wikipedia to create awareness of public art, rather than creating encyclopedia articles about notable entities. It'll be interesting to watch progress. PamD (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T14:34:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-02T14:34:00.000Z-Johnbod-2011-02-02T14:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I'm sorry you are not interested in joining the project, PamD. To be clear, I only suggested Johnbod was harassing members of the project to no productive end, no you. Your edits and thoughts have been productive and helpful.--RichardMcCoy (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T14:46:00.000Z","author":"RichardMcCoy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T14:46:00.000Z-A_Change_to_Support?","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-02T14:52:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T14:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well, one of your colleagues disagrees and has just told me I'm "nitpicking with us and pointing fingers and treating us like children". See User_talk:HstryQT#Category:Public_art_stubs. PamD (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T14:52:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-02T14:52:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T14:46:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I can only speak directly for myself and again say that it was Johnbod that was engaging in harassing tactics to no productive end. Many members of the project have worked hard to get new people interested working in WP (often the very demographic the Foundation is trying to engage) so there is a sensitivity to the issue. Again, I can only say I've appreciated your help and productivity with the project. Thanks.--RichardMcCoy (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-02T15:05:00.000Z","author":"RichardMcCoy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T15:05:00.000Z-A_Change_to_Support?","replies":["c-Gun_Powder_Ma-2011-02-15T10:22:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T15:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

As for the harassing part, I have to agree. He's been following me for years now and that with a marked self-righteous attitude. Guess that is almost inevitable in someone whose epic-long edit history reveals him wasting literally his whole life on Wiki. That is sad but the really sad thing is that it is the productive members who have to suffer from these obsessed who can't loose up because they have demonstrably no life. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 10:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-15T10:22:00.000Z","author":"Gun Powder Ma","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Gun_Powder_Ma-2011-02-15T10:22:00.000Z-RichardMcCoy-2011-02-02T15:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-15T13:12:00.000Z-Gun_Powder_Ma-2011-02-15T10:22:00.000Z"]}}-->

Well he has obviously ruffled your feathers. There seem to be some interesting personalities around the fine art area, as it's pretty much the only place I've been attacked as I was by User:HstryQT (she deleted my interaction from her talk page rather than give any diffs to illustrate her claims when I asked for them - but it left a very nasty taste). My only contacts with JohnBod suggest that he is an extremely knowledgeable editor - knowledgeable both about art and about Wikipedia. I don't know the history of your interactions with him (it could well be that his "self-righteous attitude" is an attempt to follow Wikipedia's policies, which some editors find irksome), but my talk page is not the place to insult other Wikipedians. PamD (talk) 13:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-15T13:12:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-15T13:12:00.000Z-Gun_Powder_Ma-2011-02-15T10:22:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

PamD, my claim for his profession of accountancy is from the obituaries back in 2003. The Independent, Michael Meadowcroft in The Guardian and the Telegraph all specify accountancy. The Wikipedia article on Wainwright does say that his early career was as a merchant banker, but the claim is unsourced. What evidence can you cite for reverting my edit? Philip Cross (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-15T19:24:00.000Z","author":"Philip Cross","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Philip_Cross-2011-02-15T19:24:00.000Z-Richard_Wainwright's_pre-Westminster_occupation","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-15T23:55:00.000Z-Philip_Cross-2011-02-15T19:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

You had not referenced your information, and I didn't think the information (whether banking or accountancy) was particularly relevant in his son's biog - Richard was notable as a Liberal MP. Richard's article is almost entirely unsourced (perhaps with your 3 articles to hand you could improve both its content and its sourcing?), and I realise I'd made the mistake of using it as my source. I've replaced accountancy, but listed after the politics - as the Independent obit has it. Reasonable compromise? PamD (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-15T23:55:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-15T23:55:00.000Z-Philip_Cross-2011-02-15T19:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-16T00:17:00.000Z-PamD-2011-02-15T23:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Have added the 3 obits as "External links" to RW article - would be useful starting point for anyone wanting to check/source it. PamD (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-16T00:17:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-16T00:17:00.000Z-PamD-2011-02-15T23:55:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Pam D

The reason I changed it was to standardise all the pages re Roman Catholic cathedrals in the UK. If you don't understand my reasons you're not a Catholic ;¬p

God bless

Ulysses54 (talk) 20:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-25T20:45:00.000Z","author":"Ulysses54","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ulysses54-2011-02-25T20:45:00.000Z-Leeds_Cathedral","replies":["c-PamD-2011-02-26T08:10:00.000Z-Ulysses54-2011-02-25T20:45:00.000Z"]}}-->

You're right: I don't understand your reasons, I'm not a Catholic, and I think Wikipedia is better served by articles which have the article title in the lead sentence. Has there been any discussion of this standardisation, or is it just your own preference? PamD (talk) 08:10, 26 February 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-02-26T08:10:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-02-26T08:10:00.000Z-Ulysses54-2011-02-25T20:45:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello PamD,

"Please note that {{stub}} goes at the end of the article, after everything except interwiki links, per WP:LAYOUT, not at the top. And it doesn't take parameters."

OK, thanks for the information. I'm not too familiar with these aspects of Wikipedia. :-)

"Also, I imagine you found the newspaper references online (unless it's your personal press cuttings file) - so why not make them into links to the online sources? Only very few readers will be able to follow up the information in The Southern Reporter in hard copy, but they can all (now) click a link and read the detail there. Please link to online sources when they are available. Thanks."

Done, including for the reading reference.

"But, more interestingly - what happened next? Googling finds me no mention of the stone after 2008. Do you know anything more? PamD (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)"

I must confess I have no idea of the outcome. The Indonesian WP article only says that discussions are under progress... :-) Humboldt 10:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 35 - March 2011 February issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the thirty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,766 last month to 8,841 on February 26th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 65 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 61. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,376 articles. Currently we have twenty six Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Frederick Delius was nominated for FA on February 1st Frederick Delius was promoted to FA on February 8th Battle of Towton was promoted to FA on February 8th George Hirst was nominated for GA on February 10th Scarborough Castle PR opened on February 17th Member News There are now 84 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the February newsletter: notjamesbond (talk · contribs) No members left the project this month, a duplicate entry was removed: though the number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 29 January 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Great Backlog Drive Most of you should have spotted the advertisement for the Great Backlog Drive that is under way at the moment. This is an initiative to reduce the number of tags that are attached to articles by attempting to fix as many of these as possible. Of cause some tags are more of a problem to fix than others but the purpose of the drive is to cut down the overall number of articles that have identified problems in them, rather than concentrate on specific problems. It would be good if project members got involved in this and fixed tags that they come across in their editing. It would also be helpful to avoid tagging new problems by fixing them when you spot the problem, though if you cannot fix it then tag for someone else to look at. The project clean up listing gives a list of the more common tags attached to the project's articles, of which 32.1 % are marked for clean up, and can be found - Clean up listing in article order Clean up listing grouped by tag Those who want a challenge can get involved in the competition that is been run during the period - see here for details. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The March 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XII Dec 01, 2010 ~ Dec 31, 2010 John Fowler (agricultural engineer) Scampston Hall XIII Jan 01, 2011 ~ Jan 31, 2011 Yorkshire Joe Simpson (mountaineer) XIV Feb 01, 2011 ~ Feb 28, 2011 National Railway Museum RAF Fylingdales XV Mar 01, 2011 ~ Mar 31, 2011 Yorkshire Dales Todmorden War Memorial Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 22:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-05T22:33:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-03-05T22:33:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_March_2011","replies":[]}}-->

thanks! Decora (talk) 15:33, 6 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-06T15:33:00.000Z","author":"Decora","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Decora-2011-03-06T15:33:00.000Z-California_Comprehensive_Computer_Data_Access_and_Fraud_Act","replies":[]}}-->

I think your edits on this disambiguation page were unnecessary and complicate WP. My original page followed WP:DPAGES well. But I won't argue with you over your edits, not worth it. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 23:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-07T23:49:00.000Z","author":"The Founders Intent","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Founders_Intent-2011-03-07T23:49:00.000Z-Pilate","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-08T08:31:00.000Z-The_Founders_Intent-2011-03-07T23:49:00.000Z"]}}-->

I was brought to that set of pages (Pilat etc) by one of them being in Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup, so another editor clearly agreed that all was not well. The large number of people with surname "Pilat" were certainly inappropriate in a dab page, particularly here where there already existed a separate page for the surname. PamD (talk) 08:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-08T08:31:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-08T08:31:00.000Z-The_Founders_Intent-2011-03-07T23:49:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

My apologies for misleading you into tagging my new article with CSD:G7

I took a dinner break while in the midst of editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shentino (talk • contribs) 10:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-11T10:24:00.000Z","author":"Shentino","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shentino-2011-03-11T10:24:00.000Z-SCEA_v._Hotz","replies":[]}}-->

As you wish. But FYI, he is generally referred to, and cited as, H. G. Andrewartha. Pdfpdf (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-11T17:07:00.000Z","author":"Pdfpdf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pdfpdf-2011-03-11T17:07:00.000Z-Andrewartha","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:12:00.000Z-Pdfpdf-2011-03-11T17:07:00.000Z"]}}-->

I think all scientists are cited by their initials, surely. But the encyclopedia calls him "Herbert". I wonder about Browning - is he really best at T. O. ? Makes it more difficult to find him (is that "T.O." or "T O " or "T. O."?) Wikipedia uses <firstname> <lastname> unless there is a good reason not to. PamD (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-11T17:12:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:12:00.000Z-Pdfpdf-2011-03-11T17:07:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:15:00.000Z-PamD-2011-03-11T17:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Look at Category:Australian entomologists, where he's the only one with initials. PamD (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-11T17:15:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:15:00.000Z-PamD-2011-03-11T17:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:20:00.000Z-PamD-2011-03-11T17:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

And this suggests we need a redirect from Tom B. PamD (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-11T17:20:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-11T17:20:00.000Z-PamD-2011-03-11T17:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

OK, I'm convinced. Pdfpdf (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC) (However, I'll warn you that as I don't like "John Mark Doe", and don't particularly like "J. M. Doe", it wouldn't take much to convince me on this topic. Pdfpdf (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC))__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-12T00:25:00.000Z","author":"Pdfpdf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Pdfpdf-2011-03-12T00:25:00.000Z-Andrewartha","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for your note!

• Yes, I have only recently started work on the nous article but I was aware that to make any sense it needs to include discussion about the multiple intelligences, and making sure the connections and distinctions are more clear. The current article is too esoteric.
• There were indeed multiple forms of nous which eventually came to be proposed in late classical and medieval times (active intellect, passive intellect, material intellect, acquired intellect etc), and the concept of there being several might one day need to be split out for discussion, however the article you found appears to be about intelligence in the modern psychological sense.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-12T09:31:00.000Z","author":"Andrew Lancaster","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andrew_Lancaster-2011-03-12T09:31:00.000Z-Nous_and_intelligences","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Avicennasis's talk page.
Message added 15:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-18T15:28:00.000Z","author":"Avicennasis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Avicennasis-2011-03-18T15:28:00.000Z-Talkback","replies":[]}}-->

I learn something new everyday around here! Thanks for adding that citation!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-21T23:41:00.000Z","author":"Mike Searson","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mike_Searson-2011-03-21T23:41:00.000Z-Stanley_knife","replies":[],"displayName":"Mike"}}-->

Thanks for your help. I will ad more to the article. Could you put in one of those boxes with the schools information. I can add the information if you could add the box.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hashbron (talk • contribs) 17:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-11-28T17:30:00.000Z","author":"Hashbron","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hashbron-2010-11-28T17:30:00.000Z-Littlebrook_school","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks. -Maile66 (talk) 23:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-23T23:50:00.000Z","author":"Maile66","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Maile66-2011-03-23T23:50:00.000Z-Patricia_de_Leon","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. The PM page contained a People section before I added more. Plenty of precedent: see AJ (split out), TJ (mixed in)... all part of the massive disorganization and lack of standards across these pages. I'll weigh in on the discussion once I see where you start it. Thanks for the heads up. Jokestress (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-26T08:33:00.000Z","author":"Jokestress","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jokestress-2011-03-26T08:33:00.000Z-People_sections_on_two-letter_disambiguations_pages","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, I feel unjustly criticized by your comment that Adler may not meet notability requirements (gee, not as important as some baseball player in Idaho?) and that the references are inadequate. I translated from the Yiddish theater lexicon for this, it's generally regarded as a very respectable source. Please answer if possible on my talk page as I am not sure I'd see if you answered here. Jane Peppler (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-26T21:57:00.000Z","author":"Jane Peppler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T21:57:00.000Z-What_do_you_mean,_Julius_Adler_has_inadequate_references?","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-27T08:32:00.000Z-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T21:57:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hi Jane, it wasn't me who added the "notability" tag to the page, nor the "refimprove". You can check all this by looking at the page history.

I moved the page - the disambiguation was more detailed than necessary. I also ensured that anyone looking for "Julius Adler" could actually find this page - in this case by creating a disambiguation page, sometimes it would have been appropriate to add a WP:HATNOTE instead, but please remember to do one of these when you create a page with a title with a disambiguation in brackets.

I did add "Wikify" to this page: not only does it need more links (eg to his birthplace, and the theatres mentioned), but it also needs improvements to the layout, most particularly turning the opening non-sentence "Born in.." into a proper Wikipedia lead sentence of the form "Name (dates) was a (nationality) (occupation).", as I explained carefully on your talk page in relation to Zina Goldstein.

I prefer to keep conversations intact on this page - you can add it to your Watchlist so that you are alerted to any reply - but I'll give you a "talkback" notification. PamD (talk) 08:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-27T08:32:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-27T08:32:00.000Z-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T21:57:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Saying something needs to be wikified is pretty vague. I do not understand what you want here. And again, there are precious few articles to link this too as far as I can see. You have discouraged me quite a bit today. Jane Peppler (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-26T22:05:00.000Z","author":"Jane Peppler","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T22:05:00.000Z-Your_criticism_of_the_Hymie_Jacobson_article.","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-27T07:46:00.000Z-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T22:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm sorry to have discouraged you. Because I spend a lot of time stub-sorting I came across several of your new articles. I had already put the opening sentence into proper Wikipedia style (was the original opening translated verbatim from your source, I wonder? If so, please watch out for copyright issues.) The article needed links to the various towns in his life, which another editor has since made,also to Yiddish and vaudeville. Were none of the theatres he performed in worthy of a Wikipedia article, either existing or future? (There's nothing the matter with red links to notable entities). What about Nahum Stutchkoff? PamD (talk) 07:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-27T07:46:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-27T07:46:00.000Z-Jane_Peppler-2011-03-26T22:05:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Trappedinburnley's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hallo, You seem to have created a duplicate article by copying the contents of Jean-Jacques Menais, but we only need one article about one person. I've made Jyjou into a "redirect". If you think the article ought to be at the title "Jyjou" instead of at his full name, use the "Move" procedure (which is hidden under the drop-down menu to the left of the search box). PamD (talk) 16:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Jyjou* ( www.jyjou.com) is the artist name, that' s it which is important not jean-jacques Menais i tried to change, but no succes, i have not the button move procedure ?!can you do it ? thank you Naisme (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-31T12:04:00.000Z","author":"Naisme","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Naisme-2011-03-31T12:04:00.000Z-change_Jean-jacques_menais_by_Jyjou*","replies":["c-PamD-2011-03-31T13:01:00.000Z-Naisme-2011-03-31T12:04:00.000Z"]}}-->

Done it - OK, bien, c'est fait. PamD (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-31T13:01:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-03-31T13:01:00.000Z-Naisme-2011-03-31T12:04:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

In my extended role as a Wiki Guide, I have responded to User talk:Jane Peppler#Watchlist. Your interplay with her is commendable and in the spirit of fellowship (Are we all "fellows"?). I think the best way to teach and to learn is by example. If she is wise, she will follow your lead. If not she may continue to be discouraged. Buster Seven Talk 15:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-03-31T15:52:00.000Z","author":"Buster7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buster7-2011-03-31T15:52:00.000Z-Discouragement","replies":[],"displayName":"Buster Seven"}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 36 - April 2011 March issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the thirty sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,841 last month to 8,899 on March 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 66 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 62. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,395 articles. Currently we have twenty six Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity George Hirst was promoted to GA on March 7th Brontë family was nominated for GA on March 15th Howard Webb failed GA on March 16th Member News There are 84 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! No membership changes have taken place since the March newsletter, though the number of active members is still currently low. Thanks Thanks to all those who took part in the Great Backlog Drive raised in the last newsletter. A small inroad was made getting down from 32.1% to 31.7% of articles tagged. A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 29 January 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. WikiConference UK 2011 Just a reminder for those members in the UK that there is the WikiConference UK 2011 that takes place in Bristol on 16 April 2011. This will incorporate the Wikimedia UK's annual conference. It would be good if the project has some members who could attend and support the event. Opportunities are available to get more widely involved in the direction of the UK chapter. If you have time you can volunteer and get involved by just contacting them here. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The April 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XIII Jan 01, 2011 ~ Jan 31, 2011 Yorkshire Joe Simpson (mountaineer) XIV Feb 01, 2011 ~ Feb 28, 2011 National Railway Museum RAF Fylingdales XV Mar 01, 2011 ~ Mar 31, 2011 Yorkshire Dales Todmorden War Memorial XVI Apr 01, 2011 ~ Apr 30, 2011 Yarm Barbara Hepworth Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 23:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-08T23:25:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-04-08T23:25:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_April_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Pam! I noted your reversion of the edit by XKaTiEz, as a vandalism edit. I don't believe that was vandalism! The edit simply changed the precedence of measurment to use Imperial measurements with the conversion template giving the Metric measurement second, which is okay in an English based location article. Note UK roadsign's are in Miles not Kilometres. ;) Richard Harvey (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-09T09:53:00.000Z","author":"Richard Harvey","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Richard_Harvey-2011-04-09T09:53:00.000Z-Ilkley","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-09T17:05:00.000Z-Richard_Harvey-2011-04-09T09:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've got nothing against using traditional measurements, and WP:MOSNUM allows either for UK distances while prefering metric, but you need to have another look at the figures she input! She changed 80 metres to 690ft. That's vandalism. PamD (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-09T17:05:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-09T17:05:00.000Z-Richard_Harvey-2011-04-09T09:53:00.000Z","replies":["c-Richard_Harvey-2011-04-10T09:21:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-09T17:05:00.000Z"]}}-->

I must admit that at first glance my tired eyes just spotted the 69 and as 70 Metres is the height of the river banking I thought it to be only one out! However you are right in that the measurement is incorrect. Taking a closer look at my OS maps I see that both 80M and 100M for both measurements are incorrect, so I will alter the article accordingly. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:21, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T09:21:00.000Z","author":"Richard Harvey","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Richard_Harvey-2011-04-10T09:21:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-09T17:05:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there,

Please notice that per WP:PROD an article can only be proposed for deletion once. Please check the page history prior to proposing an article for deletion in the future. If you wish to contest the PROD removal, you may take the article to articles for deletion. Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 05:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T05:30:00.000Z","author":"MacMed","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MacMed-2011-04-10T05:30:00.000Z-John_Gioia","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z-MacMed-2011-04-10T05:30:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry, forgot he'd already been PRODded. Still seems distinctly un-notable local elected official just doing local stuff, but I'll leave it at that. PamD (talk) 07:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z-MacMed-2011-04-10T05:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:43:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

But have just spent some time cleaning it up somewhat. PamD (talk) 07:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T07:43:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:43:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Please don't delete this article on John Gioia please do a basic google search to see how notable he is. In any case no more prods, take it to AfD, a place I know it will survive but I don't want to have to be looking over my shoulder, make sense? LA Times, SF Chronicle, SJ Mercury. Contra Costa Times. Richmond Confidential. El Cerrito Patch. West County Times. KTVU News. Sites dedicated to opposing him. Sites that praise him. His political profile. Major, Regional, Local and many other sources are available. He is notable.71.142.74.66 (talk) 06:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T06:31:00.000Z","author":"71.142.74.66","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-71.142.74.66-2011-04-10T06:31:00.000Z-John_Gioia_2","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z-71.142.74.66-2011-04-10T06:31:00.000Z"]}}-->

See above. PamD (talk) 07:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-10T07:27:00.000Z-71.142.74.66-2011-04-10T06:31:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The main reason I created the 'no fit' article was due to a search popping up a redlink to the page with that spelling. It never occurred to me to check the alternate nofit spelling or that there might have been a nofit page - thanks for your help, I was planning to get back to doing a bit more work on the page later today, and I'd probably have found the redirect eventually. I'll go have a look and see if there is anything on the nofit page. EdwardLane (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC) and yes I think it's great name regardless of spelling options :) EdwardLane (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-12T14:29:00.000Z","author":"EdwardLane","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EdwardLane-2011-04-12T14:29:00.000Z-No_Fit\/nofit_state","replies":[]}}-->

The material you removed as vandalism from my talk page might well be a simple question asked in the wrong place for some reason I admit I do not understad, and , AGF, I prefer to deal with such myself. But in general, regardless of my personal preferences, please be very careful about not using the word "vandalism" in edit summaries when you mean "error". DGG ( talk ) 17:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-12T17:12:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DGG-2011-04-12T17:12:00.000Z-editing_user_talk_pages","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-12T21:33:00.000Z-DGG-2011-04-12T17:12:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry, I shouldn't have touched your page. But it looked suspect as the newbie editor had deleted a section discussing vandalism on a page, and I'm afraid that for once I didn't AGF but assumed it was a pseudo-naive interference with that discussion. Should have left it to you to decide and fix. Hmm, 2.25 this afternoon ... yes, Mother had probably been getting on my nerves so that I was in uncharitable mood. PamD (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-12T21:33:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-12T21:33:00.000Z-DGG-2011-04-12T17:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-DGG-2011-04-12T22:35:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-12T21:33:00.000Z"]}}-->

it's ok, usually it's clear, but sometimes it can be very hard to tell from someone's first edit. DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-12T22:35:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-DGG-2011-04-12T22:35:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-12T21:33:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at [[User talk:ClemRutter#Whitehurst & Son sundial (1812)|ClemRutter's talk page]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And it looks if I have broken the template!--ClemRutter (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-15T21:09:00.000Z","author":"ClemRutter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClemRutter-2011-04-15T21:09:00.000Z-Wikipedia:GLAM\/Derby","replies":[]}}-->

I've expanded the article. It is probably quite dense... but it is a thingy that isn't so well understood. Nephron  T|C 02:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-16T02:57:00.000Z","author":"Nephron","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nephron-2011-04-16T02:57:00.000Z-Pancreatic_acinar_metaplasia","replies":[]}}-->

Sorry! I added the signature again after you deleted it. Actually I hadn't read you edit summary. Apologies! GaneshBhakt (talk) 11:32, 16 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-16T11:32:00.000Z","author":"GaneshBhakt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GaneshBhakt-2011-04-16T11:32:00.000Z-Sorry!","replies":[]}}-->

thanks pam

both articles read much better

best wishes

rob Atenstaedt (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-16T21:02:00.000Z","author":"Atenstaedt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Atenstaedt-2011-04-16T21:02:00.000Z-leslie_bonnet_and_joan_hutt","replies":[]}}-->

I do several thousands fixes a month, so mistakes are going to creep in occasionally. I try my best to avoid them but sometimes its not possible. I apologize for the mistake. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 23:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-16T23:54:00.000Z","author":"Woohookitty","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Woohookitty-2011-04-16T23:54:00.000Z-Thanks_2","replies":[],"displayName":"User:Woohookitty"}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rógvi Holm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rógvi Holm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 23:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-17T23:31:00.000Z","author":"GiantSnowman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GiantSnowman-2011-04-17T23:31:00.000Z-Nomination_of_R\u00f3gvi_Holm_for_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"Giant"}}-->

you have some idea how to handle this. Tijfo098 (talk) 08:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-22T08:18:00.000Z","author":"Tijfo098","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tijfo098-2011-04-22T08:18:00.000Z-Maybe","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for stalking. I may rely on your expertise often in the future. Buster Seven Talk 15:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T15:29:00.000Z","author":"Buster7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buster7-2011-04-28T15:29:00.000Z-Montessori","replies":["c-Dave_Ayer-2011-04-28T17:21:00.000Z-Buster7-2011-04-28T15:29:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Buster Seven"}}-->

It seems as if you have made the change you suggested on User: Buster7's talk page? Since we're on the subject, I see that the article (actually the original article, Montessori Method) was flagged for NPOV. Since the article has been entirely re-written, is it possible to get that removed? Is there a procedure I can initiate? Thanks again, Dave Ayer (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T17:21:00.000Z","author":"Dave Ayer","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dave_Ayer-2011-04-28T17:21:00.000Z-Buster7-2011-04-28T15:29:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

... User:Aa42john (earliest contribution 11/11/2009) might perhaps be User:Johnbibby (blocked 20/6/2009)? --GuillaumeTell 17:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T17:28:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T17:28:00.000Z-Wondering_whether...","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T17:28:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

Certainly a lot of similarities - professional field, location, middle east interests... approach to copyright, level of care in editing... oh and choice of forename, of course! I note that he was asked whether he had had a previous editor name and has so far not answered. PamD (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T17:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

... and that his first edit was to create John Bibby (ship): me, I keep PAM, Pamela and PD on my watchlist, and I imagine a lot of editors are interestd in their namesakes! Nothing conclusive, but makes you wonder all the more! PamD (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:05:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Have a look at this! --GuillaumeTell 21:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T21:05:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:05:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T20:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-28T21:19:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:05:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

Yes, looks convincing. Are you going to take it further? PamD (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T21:19:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-28T21:19:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:50:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T21:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'll sleep on it. I'm guessing that he's in his 70s. I notice that one-line articles and blatant copyvios still feature - see, for example, St John's in the Marsh church (York) and Advisory_Committee_on_Mathematics_Education. Is WP:ANI the best route? Or I could contact the blocking admin. --GuillaumeTell 21:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T21:50:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:50:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T21:19:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-28T22:09:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:50:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

Age 66 or 67 (http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/4037830.heworth_man_john_bibby_fasts_in_gaza_protest/)! He's a good faith editor, just tiresomely sloppy - I seem to have left various notes on his talk page(s), arising from stub-sorting his creations (and taking the Meek Family to AfD). Contacting the blocking admin might be a useful route. PamD (talk) 22:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-28T22:09:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-28T22:09:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-04-28T21:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-04-29T07:50:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T22:09:00.000Z"]}}-->

Just off for the weekend - will see any developments when I'm next on-Wiki, probably Mon or Tues. PamD (talk) 07:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-04-29T07:50:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-PamD-2011-04-29T07:50:00.000Z-PamD-2011-04-28T22:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I found a nice portrait of Sarah T. Bolton, and added it to the stub article you started. I hope you don't mind. --I NEVER CRY 02:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-07T02:47:00.000Z","author":"INeverCry","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-INeverCry-2011-05-07T02:47:00.000Z-Sarah_T._Bolton","replies":["c-PamD-2011-05-07T07:27:00.000Z-INeverCry-2011-05-07T02:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

That's great, thanks. Feel free to expand the article as much as you like: I just created it because it seemed odd to have an article about the commemorative relief while there was nothing about the woman herself! PamD (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-07T07:27:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-05-07T07:27:00.000Z-INeverCry-2011-05-07T02:47:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

I put a bit of work in on it today. I'm glad you started it.--I NEVER CRY 23:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-07T23:53:00.000Z","author":"INeverCry","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-INeverCry-2011-05-07T23:53:00.000Z-Sarah_T._Bolton","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Sir, Panj Peer or the Panj Pir (The five saints) are mentioned in the Punjabi literature's great romantic epic Heer-Ranjha. Heer Ranjha was written by Mian Waris Shah of Pakistan. It has been translated in many languages. Ranjha (The main Hero) was blessed by the five Great Saints of the time. These are same five great saints. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IAS JSINGH (talk • contribs) 18:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-08T18:03:00.000Z","author":"IAS JSINGH","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-IAS_JSINGH-2011-05-08T18:03:00.000Z-Regarding_Panj_Peer","replies":[]}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 37 - May 2011 April issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the thirty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,899 last month to 8,918 on April 19th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 66 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 62. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,413 articles. Currently we have twenty six Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Brontë family failed GA on April 1st Member News There are now 85 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the April newsletter: Mykleavens (talk · contribs) No members left the project this month: though the number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 20 April 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Commons images For those of you who missed it, April saw a milestone for images on Commons with the upload of the 10 millionth image. There are images on most subjects, if you can find them, to illustrate articles. With the major work of transferring Geograph images to Commons nearing completion then most location articles should have images available for use in illustrating the subject. All of the village and civil parish articles that had articles in December 2009 had categories created on Commons for them so that the Geograph images can be placed into them. Thus the {{Commons category}} template can be added to all village and civil parish articles to link to all the available images on Commons for the location. Though beware that if the template does not have any arguments, moving of the article to a new name will break the link to Commons so it is wise to include the article name in the template call e.g.{{Commons category|Rotherham}}. Those of you interested in helping out at Commons are more than welcome to help organise and categorise all of the uploaded Geograph images so that they can be found and made available to users. For more details see the press release. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The May 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XIV Feb 01, 2011 ~ Feb 28, 2011 National Railway Museum RAF Fylingdales XV Mar 01, 2011 ~ Mar 31, 2011 Yorkshire Dales Todmorden War Memorial XVI Apr 01, 2011 ~ Apr 30, 2011 Yarm Barbara Hepworth XVII May 01, 2011 ~ May 31, 2011 Pennine Way Mappin & Webb Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 04:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-16T04:17:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-05-16T04:17:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_May_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Hey, I noticed that you tagged John Carter (1741-1808) for notability. Just so you know in the future, politicians with significant responsibility, such as mayors like Carter, are always notable except when their jurisdiction is extremely insignificant (such as town councils) or they have no coverage in secondary sources. Portsmith is quite an important jurisdiction :P See Wikipedia:Notability_(people). Happy editing! Sadads (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-20T10:52:00.000Z","author":"Sadads","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sadads-2011-05-20T10:52:00.000Z-Notability_tag","replies":[]}}-->

please do not delete 100 Grand Jin. It is needed as it is an album and the only search result for "100 Grand Jin". it will be worked on over time because it wikipedia is such a complex and time taking thing. Jmwikiacc (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-30T21:19:00.000Z","author":"Jmwikiacc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jmwikiacc-2011-05-30T21:19:00.000Z-100_Grand_Jin","replies":["c-PamD-2011-05-30T21:35:00.000Z-Jmwikiacc-2011-05-30T21:19:00.000Z"]}}-->

Don't tell me, comment at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/100_Grand_Jin. PamD (talk) 21:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-05-30T21:35:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-05-30T21:35:00.000Z-Jmwikiacc-2011-05-30T21:19:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

An article that you have been involved in editing, Winterbourne, Gloucestershire , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-01T10:29:00.000Z","author":"Skinsmoke","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skinsmoke-2011-06-01T10:29:00.000Z-Merge_discussion_for_Winterbourne,_Gloucestershire","replies":[]}}-->

Maybe.. you could offer some advice here on how to sort out the naming. We need a new article on Roman Derby, that embraces Icknield Street- Strutt's Park Roman fort, Derby Racecourse Roman settlement and Little Chester Roman fort- now Derventio (Little Chester).There are messages on the talkpages- and links to online references which reveal much misinformation and confusion. User:Andrew Dalby is the real expert here. The big question is what should each of these articles be called. I have objections but few positive suggestions. Icknield Street is probably the right name- though in Derby it is Rykneild Street and its course is unknown, Strutt's Park Roman fort is probably right but there is a nagging issue over the apostrophe. Derby Racecourse Roman settlement is up for grabs- it is probably a later vicus, but the Roman fort at Little Chester la:Derventio (Derbia) in Latin is confused with a Roman town of which it was in 2 periods of history a part. Anyway Derventio (Little Chester) seems to be wrongly disamb'ed.

Maybe you have suggestions.--ClemRutter (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-04T20:46:00.000Z","author":"ClemRutter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClemRutter-2011-06-04T20:46:00.000Z-Derventio_(Little_Chester)","replies":["c-Andrew_Dalby-2011-06-08T13:25:00.000Z-ClemRutter-2011-06-04T20:46:00.000Z"]}}-->

Expert is putting it too strong! All I've done is added some bibliography to the articles; but most of that stuff isn't on line and I don't have access to it. I agree with Clem: suggestions welcome. Andrew Dalby 13:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-08T13:25:00.000Z","author":"Andrew Dalby","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andrew_Dalby-2011-06-08T13:25:00.000Z-ClemRutter-2011-06-04T20:46:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"And"}}-->

Dear Sir, I have a good collection of authentic Material on Punjabi Literature, Linguistics (which are still untouched by wiki), which I wish to share with Wikipedia users. I dont know how to creat new articles/link them with others or other basic things. What makes the situation even Worse is the fact that I usually have very less time (even to read & grasp "how to pages" of Wiki).

I don't want any credit for my contributions. So I wish to provide materials without any condition, so that you (If possible) can post them for the benefit of future generations of Students. I can provide the Topics (with easy explanation, Reference books, sources etc.) by mail/or any other source if possible. Thanks IAS JSINGH (talk) 14:35, 6 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-06T14:35:00.000Z","author":"IAS JSINGH","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-IAS_JSINGH-2011-06-06T14:35:00.000Z-Problems_I_face_contributing_to_Wikipedia","replies":[]}}-->

thank you for your assistance. I learn more every day. Dreadfullyboring (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-16T18:07:00.000Z","author":"Dreadfullyboring","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dreadfullyboring-2011-06-16T18:07:00.000Z-Rhonda_Smith_page","replies":[]}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 38 - June 2011 May issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the thirty eighth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,918 last month to 8,974 on May 23rd). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 68 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 63. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,439 articles. Currently we have twenty six Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity River Don Navigation nominated for GA on April 23rd William Stones Ltd peer review initiated on April 25th Ravensworth peer review initiated on May 5th Gerard (archbishop of York) peer review initiated on May 12th Sheffield Wednesday F.C. FAR initiated on May 14th River Don Navigation promoted to GA on May 15th Halifax Gibbet peer review initiated on May 18th Halifax Gibbet FAC initiated on May 21st Geoffrey (archbishop of York) peer review initiated on May 22nd Member News There are now 85 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the May newsletter: MikeBeckett (talk · contribs) One member was removed from the project this month for socking. The number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 20 April 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The June 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XV Mar 01, 2011 ~ Mar 31, 2011 Yorkshire Dales Todmorden War Memorial XVI Apr 01, 2011 ~ Apr 30, 2011 Yarm Barbara Hepworth XVII May 01, 2011 ~ May 31, 2011 Pennine Way Mappin & Webb XIV Jun 01, 2011 ~ Jun 30, 2011 Leeds United A.F.C. and Manchester United F.C. rivalry Paull Holme Tower Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 03:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-19T03:37:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-06-19T03:37:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_June_2011","replies":[]}}-->

I am a bit surprised that it is not possible to e-mail you. OK, most of the Wikipedia-related e-mails that I receive should have been dealt with via my talk page. But there are a few matters too sensitive for that route and I have one currently which I would like to send to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-15T22:53:00.000Z","author":"RHaworth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RHaworth-2011-06-15T22:53:00.000Z-E-mail","replies":["c-PamD-2011-06-25T17:27:00.000Z-RHaworth-2011-06-15T22:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

I've been away for a couple of weeks, just seen this. I've never seen any need for email contact in connection with WP, so thought it best not to enable it, but have now done so in case you still want to contact me. If I find it being used irrelevantly I'll close it down again - I'll be interested to see how much it gets used. PamD (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-25T17:27:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-06-25T17:27:00.000Z-RHaworth-2011-06-15T22:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi- sorry to drag you across the Pennines but I am trying to make sense of the Commons:Lancaster, Lancashire category tree. And before I add to the mess I thought I needed an experts opinion. I find there is no Commons:Lancaster - Commons:House of Lancaster exists and was linked back to Commons:Lancaster, Lancashire. My instinct is to model it on Commons:York but is there a better way? Where does one start? Any advice welcome. --ClemRutter (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-06-20T09:55:00.000Z","author":"ClemRutter","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ClemRutter-2011-06-20T09:55:00.000Z-Lancaster,_on_Commons","replies":[]}}-->

Hi! Thanks for the link to WP:NCF and for all the clean-up. I'm a bit confused. Next time, I shall do better. Au plaisir, --Wikinade (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-06T19:07:00.000Z","author":"Wikinade","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wikinade-2011-07-06T19:07:00.000Z-Sue_Lost_in_Manhattan","replies":[]}}-->

Hi, as a senior editor, I need your feedback on the above subject. I have recreated the article Nihal Sri Ameresekere as there are more than 50 hits on the Google News for Nihal Sri Ameresekere to establish his notability.EconomicTiger (talk) 08:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-10T08:54:00.000Z","author":"EconomicTiger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-EconomicTiger-2011-07-10T08:54:00.000Z-Nihal_Sri_Ameresekere","replies":[]}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 39 - July 2011 June issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the thirty ninth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,974 last month to 9,083 on June 28). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 68 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 63. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,603 articles. Currently we have twenty five Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Abe Waddington peer review initiated on May 30th Halifax Gibbet promoted to FA on May 31st Martin Hawke, 7th Baron Hawke nominated for GA on June 1st Hedley Verity nominated for GA on June 3rd Ed Miliband nominated for GA on June 25th Sheffield Wednesday F.C. was demoted from FA on June 28th Member News There are now 87 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the June newsletter: Agdturner (talk · contribs) Zeyi (talk · contribs) No members left the project this month. The number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 30 June 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Featured Lists Featured Lists have been promoted during the last month and have now been given their own weekly slot on the main page. Lists appear on the front page on Mondays just above "Today's featured picture". This may be extended to other days at a later date if people like it. In line with this I have also added a box for lists on to the Yorkshire Portal and created a couple of entries to start it off, more will be added later. The project currently has 12 featured lists, out of 208 project articles identified as lists, and it would be good if we could get some of these on to the front page. Of anyone wants to take this up they need to create an entry for the list and nominate them to be considered here. Lists are easier than articles to get to featured status as there is less prose to be created and the bulk of the page is the list itself. Most of the project's current featured lists are on football related topics and it would be good to get a broader range of topics for out Featured Lists. Some of the 208 lists could be brought up to featured status with a little bit of work, if any one wants to take up the challenge. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The July 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XVI 1 Apr 2011 ~ 30 Apr 2011 Yarm Barbara Hepworth XVII 1 May 2011 ~ 31 May 2011 Pennine Way Mappin & Webb XVIII 1 Jun 2011 ~ 30 Jun 2011 Leeds United A.F.C. and Manchester United F.C. rivalry Paull Holme Tower XIX 1 Jul 2011 ~ 31 Jul 2011 Whitby The History Boys Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 22:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-11T22:47:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-07-11T22:47:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_July_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Why are you criticizing me of a disambiguation page? I didn't know what I did was wrong and I don't see why they're wasting people's time. A person who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010. 16:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-16T16:47:00.000Z","author":"Since 10.28.2010","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-16T16:47:00.000Z-english","replies":[],"displayName":"since"}}-->

Thanks for your help. I don't know why there's no biography that has these details, but I did use a newspaper article dated February 2006 which said he was 65. And it wasn't really about him.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-21T20:34:00.000Z","author":"Vchimpanzee","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Vchimpanzee-2011-07-21T20:34:00.000Z-Charlie_Brown_(DJ)","replies":[]}}-->

Hey sorry for deleting that thing earlier; I really did appreciate it, and it was an accidental deletion. I'll replace it as soon as possible, probably on Monday, because with device I have right now, I currently have no Copy + Paste capabilities. Thanks! Connormlh (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-22T01:16:00.000Z","author":"Connormlh","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Connormlh-2011-07-22T01:16:00.000Z-Accident","replies":["c-Connormlh-2011-07-25T18:54:00.000Z-Connormlh-2011-07-22T01:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hey, sorry again to bother, but would you still like me to replace it? I'm still not sure, because you didn't respond. Let me know and I'll do it ASAP. Thanks! Connormlh (talk) 18:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-25T18:54:00.000Z","author":"Connormlh","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Connormlh-2011-07-25T18:54:00.000Z-Connormlh-2011-07-22T01:16:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-25T20:54:00.000Z-Connormlh-2011-07-25T18:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

I didn't reply because I don't know what "thing" you're talking about here, so assumed that you'd accidentally left a message here intended for someone else! Could you clarify? thanks. PamD (talk) 20:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-25T20:54:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-25T20:54:00.000Z-Connormlh-2011-07-25T18:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

People will also find contradictions in the book, The Phinehas Priesthood, by Danny W. Davis. Davis points out that since many classify Phinehas Priests as "Lone Wolves", and in that by doing so, refutes by definition, an attempt to classify by groups. <P.4, The Phinehas Priesthood, Violent Vanguard of the Christian Identity Movement, Danny W. Davis>Curtjohnsen (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Curtis J.__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-26T01:00:00.000Z","author":"Curtjohnsen","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Curtjohnsen-2011-07-26T01:00:00.000Z-Contradictions_to_Classification_of_Phinehas_Priests","replies":[]}}-->

I'm contemplating an article on St Saviour, Ellerby Road, which is located in The Bank according to Wrathmell, Leach and Pevsner, but discover that there's no article on that area. I decided that The Bank is pretty much in the Richmond Hill area, but was extremely surprised to discover that the RH article is Richmond Hill, West Yorkshire. Further investigations revealed that a name-change from the much more sensible Richmond Hill, Leeds was instigated by KeithD in March 2008. He said at User talk:Hans Adler/Archive 2 "The dab on this should be West Yorkshire, as it was, this is as per the normal naming convention for UK places. Locations should normally use the County for dab and only go to a district or other local name when there is more than a one of the same name in a County. We should not be lining up with others which may be wrong but rather renaming the others in line with the normal convention."

However, looking at Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#England, I discover:

"For localities requiring disambiguation:

...[snip]... For localities unambiguously located within a town/city settlement (according to reliable, external sources) "placename, town/city" is used. For example, within the borough of Milton Keynes, for localities in the defined new city area "placename, Milton Keynes" is used, as with Bradwell, Milton Keynes. Localities within the borough but outside the city area continue to be disambiguated by ceremonial county, as with Olney, Buckinghamshire."

Presumably the rule that Keith was quoting has been superseded by the above much more sensible statement. But Category:Places in Leeds has a real mishmash of article titles - Bramley, Buslingthorpe, Chapeltown, Hawksworth, Manston, Middleton, Moortown, Richmond Hill, Stourton and Wortley are all "'West Yorkshire'" (I'm not sure about Farnley, Rodley and Shadwell), and one or two of the ",Leeds" articles, e.g. Adel, Colton, certainly Walton, should perhaps be WY? Then there are the places with suffixes Wetherby, Rothwell, Wharfedale and Pudsey! Plus the articles with sub-cats shouldn't be in the list of articles as well as the list of subcats.

Anyway, I'd be happy to sort all this out, but I thought I'd run it past you first. I'll get on to Keith if I'm prevented moving some articles. Do you have any thoughts on the above (especially the "not sures")? NB I also noticed that the NSEW location maps appear on some articles but not all. I altered a few that were inaccurate or linked to dab pages. And there are some strange articles not mentioned above: Blenheim, Leeds and Moorside, Leeds spring to mind.... --GuillaumeTell 21:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-22T21:55:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-22T21:55:00.000Z-Category:Places_in_Leeds","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-22T23:06:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-22T21:55:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

• There's also the list at List of places in Leeds to consider - and the interesting fact that it has about 135 entries, while the category has 165 (excluding the list): so 31 or so entries should possibly be added to the list! I'd almost forgotten that list - but I think I'm still quite proud of it, as it brings together quite a lot of information in sortable fields. And I've just checked and found that all three of its references are still good links despite the council's tendency to rearrange their website.

I can't summon up a lot of enthusiasm for details of Leeds place articles at the moment: partly because I'm very rarely there (still looking after Mother), partly in case it reopens the ghastly "Leeds or City of Leeds" rows of the past. But certainly agree that ", Leeds" is better than ", West Yorkshire" for places which are definitely in the city (like Buslingthorpe, West Yorkshire!). (I used to have plans to try and expand that one.) I suspect that the phrase "unambiguously located within a town/city settlement (according to reliable, external sources)" is still capable of generating angry discussions in and around Leeds, so good luck with it! The rules seem to have changed in Nov 2010 after lengthy discussion which I don't remember being aware of (so perhaps wasn't on the UK WP noticeboard? Or I just didn't follow it up).

Good luck with it all! PamD (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-22T23:06:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-22T23:06:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-22T21:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-24T17:29:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-22T23:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

Update: I've moved all the offending West Yorkshire suffixs to Leeds without any comeback from anyone, and done a bit of tidying. I then turned to the List of places in Leeds and made a list of places that aren't in that list but are in the category. 12 of them are kosher as far as I can see: Ainsty, Wetherby, Beeston Hill, Carlton, Wharfedale, Fearnville, Holbeck Urban Village, Knowsthorpe (created by you!), Lincoln Green, Lovell Park, Manston, Leeds, Pendas Fields (should be Penda's?), Potterton, West Yorkshire, Stourton, Leeds, two are rather dubious (Cranmer Bank and Sturton Grange), and there are a further 15 non-notable one-liners culled from the West Yorkshire A-Z by a certain person (ranging alphabetically from Alwoodley Park to Woodhouse Carr) which I'm planning to put up for AfD.

I could try adding the first 12 to the List unless you'd like to do so? I removed Temple Newsam from the list because it isn't a place, even if it is a ward.

Comments welcome. --GuillaumeTell 17:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-24T17:29:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-24T17:29:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-22T23:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-24T17:49:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-24T17:29:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

Looks good so far. I'd notice TN disappearing from the list - probably right. (I seem to remember that the article was about the area rather than the house/park, back in the mirks of time.) OK, I'll have a go at adding the 12 to the list (will have to remind myself how it worked, but cut and paste will get it sorted). Not sure about your 2 dubious ones - if in doubt, might as well add. (cf Airebrough!) Not right now - tea nearly ready. (Mother prefers to eat around 6pm, but we're late tonight!). PamD (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-24T17:49:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-24T17:49:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-24T17:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-24T21:56:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-24T17:49:00.000Z"]}}-->

Oof, I'd forgotten how much work it was to add some places (verging on WP:OR I suppose by the time I've used the council site to get from a postcode to a ward name etc where the article is lacking an infobox or other useful stuff). Not at all sure about Knowsthorpe/Knostropp: it definitely exists/existed, and is on OS map, but not sure exactly where! Some discussion at http://www.secretleeds.com/forum/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=236 . I've added the 12 + 2 places to the list, but only put in full details for the first five and then ran out of energy. Feel free to continue the work! Cheers, PamD (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-24T21:56:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-24T21:56:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-24T17:49:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-28T23:15:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-24T21:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

Did a bit more on it today, then got distracted from Stourton, Leeds onto improving that article and then creating Yorkshire Imperial Band. Hmm, that's wikipedia! PamD (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T23:15:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-28T23:15:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-24T21:56:00.000Z","replies":["c-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-29T00:08:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-28T23:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

You may have noticed that I first PRODded and then dePRODded Jaw Hill, having found a RS for the archaeology stuff. I've been trying to work out whether it's actually in the City of Leeds and drawing a blank - can't work out where the boundary is on my 2 1/2 inch (or metric equivalent) map. It's awfully close to Kirkhamgate (Wakefield) but not far from the Ardsleys (Leeds) and not that far away from Batley (Kirklees). Oh well! The other thing is that it isn't exactly a place, it's a hill, so I'm wondering whether, if it is in Leeds, it ought to be in this Cat. (I looked at what needs doing to try to fill in the gaps in the table, but my head started to hurt!) --GuillaumeTell 00:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-29T00:08:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-07-29T00:08:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-28T23:15:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

Hi. Please tell me why you tagged List of insurance topics as PROD. An editor since 10.28.2010. 20:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T20:10:00.000Z","author":"Since 10.28.2010","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-28T20:10:00.000Z-hi","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-28T20:18:00.000Z-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-28T20:10:00.000Z"],"displayName":"An"}}-->

Were you not looking out for any replies at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Insurance, where I replied to you? And also, if you look at the page history you can see my rationale in the version where I PRODded it (at this point it still had its old title of "Insurance (disambiguation)"). PamD (talk) 20:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T20:18:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-28T20:18:00.000Z-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-28T20:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-28T20:23:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-28T20:18:00.000Z"]}}-->

No, I was not looking for replies there. I didn't know that the discussion page of List of insurance topics was at Wikiproject: Disambiguation. Thanks again, An editor since 10.28.2010. 20:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T20:23:00.000Z","author":"Since 10.28.2010","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Since_10.28.2010-2011-07-28T20:23:00.000Z-PamD-2011-07-28T20:18:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"An"}}-->

Unless I'm wrong, a Cassandra (metaphor) is not a situation; it's a person. The article may have been slightly misread or it may be misleadingly written, but if you read it closely, it says that the word is used in situations of a particular type, but it doesn't say that a Cassandra is a situation. People call people Cassandras in certain situations. They don't call certain situations Cassandras. It's not all that different from the term "Chicken Little". Like if I come up to you and start warning you of some impending doom, and you treat me dismissively, you might say, "Chris, don't be such a Cassandra." You wouldn't say "Hey, this situation is a Cassandra." Chrisrus (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T21:21:00.000Z","author":"Chrisrus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chrisrus-2011-07-28T21:21:00.000Z-A_Cassandra:_person_or_situation?","replies":["c-PamD-2011-07-28T22:06:00.000Z-Chrisrus-2011-07-28T21:21:00.000Z"]}}-->

I agree: to me a "Cassandra" is a person whose warnings are ignored, not a situation. (I don't think it would be used quite as you suggest - more likely that after your dire prophecies had happened someone would say "Chris was the Cassandra, he suggested x might happen and we wouldn't believe him.") The article seems curiously opaque on this. I've tweaked the dab page and hope you agree it's an improvement. The article has a long talk page history, quite beyond my sphere of knowledge, and I hope the dab page won't upset anyone. PamD (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-28T22:06:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-07-28T22:06:00.000Z-Chrisrus-2011-07-28T21:21:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the advice on stubs --Gauravjuvekar (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-07-31T17:40:00.000Z","author":"Gauravjuvekar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gauravjuvekar-2011-07-31T17:40:00.000Z-Thanks_3","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. I asked for help from Keith D about Genuki and he said you may be able add advice - User talk:Keith D#GENUKI. Many thanks. Acabashi (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-02T20:27:00.000Z","author":"Acabashi","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Acabashi-2011-08-02T20:27:00.000Z-GENUKI","replies":[]}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geier Indians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geier Indians until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fences&Windows 18:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-04T18:42:00.000Z","author":"Fences and windows","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Fences_and_windows-2011-08-04T18:42:00.000Z-Nomination_of_Geier_Indians_for_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"Fences"}}-->

Thanks for your post on my talk page. I've been too busy to do much with Wikipedia lately but I agree whoever trashed that article went way overboard!Elcajonfarms (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-05T20:43:00.000Z","author":"Elcajonfarms","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elcajonfarms-2011-08-05T20:43:00.000Z-Geier_page","replies":[]}}-->

Can you make this understandable? "St Luke's Anglican church on Stanks Lane North is in the Seacroft parish, Whitkirk deanery in the Diocese of Ripon and Leeds. It seats 250." It reads like a bus timetable at present.--andreasegde (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-06T19:47:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T19:47:00.000Z-Common_sense","replies":["c-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T19:47:00.000Z"]}}-->

If you can't make it understandable, it will be removed.--andreasegde (talk) 22:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T19:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-06T22:08:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z","c-Chzz-2011-08-07T21:38:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z"]}}-->

What's not to understand? Makes sense to me. (For the benefit of any Talk Page Stalkers, this is about Swarcliffe). PamD (talk) 22:08, 6 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-06T22:08:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-06T22:08:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T21:35:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-06T22:08:00.000Z"]}}-->

I like bus timetables, said the bus conductor. :))--andreasegde (talk) 21:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T21:35:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T21:35:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-06T22:08:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Can we just stick the number into the 2nd, as, St Luke's Anglican church on Stanks Lane North is in the Seacroft parish; Whitkirk deanery, which seats 250, is in the Diocese of Ripon and Leeds.?  Chzz  ►  21:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T21:38:00.000Z","author":"Chzz","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Chzz-2011-08-07T21:38:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-06T22:03:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Misunderstanding here: a "deanery" is the church area intermediate in the hierarchy between a parish and a diocese. In any case, after this had been insulted and removed a couple of times I came up with a compromise of including the diocese only, and this has survived. The deanery is perhaps a bit rarefied. PamD (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T21:42:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-07T21:42:00.000Z-Common_sense","replies":[]}}-->

Why do we have to let the BLP PROD run out in this case? Even if a source is added, it doesn't look like there's a snowball's chance in hell of this surviving an actual AfD or notability discussion. It seems like needless bureaucracy to wait for it to get deleted and then recreate it as a redirect. Hell, if it speeds things up, I'd rather just source it so that the BLP PROD doesn't apply and then redirect it, but that just seems like an awful lot of trouble to fix what looks like a vanity advertisement page. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 10:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T10:06:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:06:00.000Z-Michael_Potts","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-07T10:11:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:06:00.000Z"]}}-->

Why? Because it gives anyone interested in the article due warning that they need to provide sources or see it deleted. That's the way PROD works. Yes, it looks like a vanity page - less so since I removed his sample photos - but someone may be able to find WP:RS for notability. Give them a chance. PamD (talk) 10:11, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T10:11:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-07T10:11:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T10:11:00.000Z"]}}-->

I mean, yes, that's how it works to help save notable articles. But can't we just use common sense here? This was a logical redirect, which a user decided to turn into a page on themselves. After adding their photos to a few more articles. If we had caught it when he first made the change, most editors would probably have reverted it back to the proper redirect.--Yaksar (let's chat) 10:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T10:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T20:55:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z","c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T21:00:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z"]}}-->

Can I at least CSD tag it as a speedy so we don't have a pretty clear ad for a guy who made a page on himself for 10 days and we can get it back to its proper place as a redirect?--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T20:55:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T20:55:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

To be clear, I wouldn't normally care so much about a non-notable page taking its time before getting deleted. In this case, however, its covering up other content. Redirects matter.--Yaksar (let's chat) 21:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T21:00:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-07T21:00:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-07T10:20:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Look at the references. The church is NOT called St. Gregory the Great now. Good grief, do some homework, and actually read something.--andreasegde (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T18:48:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T18:48:00.000Z-Are_you_taking_the_Michael?","replies":[]}}-->

If you don't stop this bollards, I will contact an admin to sort it out. You syntax is extremely clumsy, and you are only interested in chopping paragraphs into little pieces. If you could link an article that you have worked on, and actually nominated for a GAR that passed, I would trust you. As it is, you are a rather large bull in a very fragile china shop.--andreasegde (talk) 18:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T18:55:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T18:55:00.000Z-Are_you_taking_the_Michael?","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T18:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

• "Look at the references": the diocese calls it "St Gregory The Great". I take that as more authoritative than GENUKI. It's their church. PamD (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T18:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-07T19:03:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z","c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T19:09:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

• And you can call my syntax clumsy while insisting on "Although not included in the Swarcliffe area, a Methodist Church (on the south side of Barwick Road), was closed in 2007."? Interesting. PamD (talk) 19:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T19:03:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-07T19:03:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You are destructive, and have no interest in co-operative work. Your think your opinion is greater than the fundamentals of Wikipedia. Wrong. I ask you to look at Leeds Country Way, and tell me it's a GA.--andreasegde (talk) 19:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T19:09:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T19:09:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:00:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Note to talk page stalkers: this interesting discussion relates to Swarcliffe. PamD (talk) 19:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T19:14:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-07T19:14:00.000Z-Are_you_taking_the_Michael?","replies":["c-Chzz-2011-08-07T19:43:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

Mhm, xe also put a {{helpme}} on that talk, but didn't make it clear what the request was - so, I asked, on User talk:Andreasegde#Helpme on Talk:Swarcliffe. I see there has been some kind of kerfuffle over the article, but still - in terms of the help request, I'm not sure what is wanted, yet.  Chzz  ►  19:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T19:43:00.000Z","author":"Chzz","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Chzz-2011-08-07T19:43:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-07T19:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

PanD, as you might see on that talk, I've been trying to help resolve their concern. I don't see any major problem here, and I hope we can work together to sort things out through further discussions on the article talk page - I'd appreciate your help and patience with that, being extra-careful to discuss anything controversial or disputed, before repeating edits (as I'm sure you will). Cheers,  Chzz  ►  20:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T20:50:00.000Z","author":"Chzz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chzz-2011-08-07T20:50:00.000Z-Are_you_taking_the_Michael?","replies":["c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T21:33:00.000Z-Chzz-2011-08-07T20:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

"Hope is the last thing to die", as they say. For a fine example of a GA article, look at Leeds Country Way, Marvellous.--andreasegde (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-07T21:33:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-07T21:33:00.000Z-Chzz-2011-08-07T20:50:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 40 - August 2011 July issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the fortieth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 9,083 last month to 9,157 on July 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 68 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 64. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,766 articles. Currently we have twenty five Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton There are also twelve featured lists: York City F.C. Clubman of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity 2010–11 York City F.C. season nominated for GA on June 30th George Hirst peer review initiated on July 7th Ed Miliband failed GA review on July 15th Martin Hawke, 7th Baron Hawke failed GA review on July 21st Gerard (archbishop of York) nominated for FA on July 22nd Ed Miliband nominated for GA on July 22nd Swarcliffe nominated for GA on July 29th Whitby peer review initiated on July 30th Member News There are now 88 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the July newsletter: Nick Watts (talk · contribs) DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk · contribs) One members left the project this month: Jorvik (talk · contribs) The number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A big thanks to those involved in the collaboration of the month effort on the Whitby article. A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 31 July 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Vandalism With the start of the school holidays there is more chances of vandalism to articles at this time of year. It is time to remind members to be on the alert for vandalism to articles, especially those that are in the projects scope. Here is a recent example of one that slipped through the net this edit which was reverted by an IP over a month after it was made! You can check the changes to the project's tagged pages using the watchlist or you can use the toolserver version which looks at just articles here. The former may not be up to date, as it requires manual update of the list of articles, but does cover all namespaces. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The August 2011 articles selected below are an editor choice and a suggestion from the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XVII 1 May 2011 ~ 31 May 2011 Pennine Way Mappin & Webb XVIII 1 Jun 2011 ~ 30 Jun 2011 Leeds United A.F.C. and Manchester United F.C. rivalry Paull Holme Tower XIX 1 Jul 2011 ~ 31 Jul 2011 Whitby The History Boys XX 1 Aug 2011 ~ 31 Aug 2011 James Cook Levitt Hagg Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 04:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-08T04:55:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-08-08T04:55:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_August_2011","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the comments. As you'll see, I've taken some of your advice, plus I've (with some difficulty - they've changed the process) put up a DYK at Template_talk:Did_you_know/Brotherton_Library.

I've added some External links and will add one for Special Collections. I'll see what I can do about describing the BC suite.

I'm in several minds about how to describe the 75th anniversary booklet in the refs. Have you seen it? On the front cover it says

[at top left] BE INSPIRED
THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
[then the U of L Et augebitur scientia logo, cribbed, more or less, from Oxford]
[and at bottom right:] UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS

Then, at the top of most of the pages, it says "Leeds University Library"! No author or ISBN or anything.

Some photos would be good. Two that look particularly good to me are

1. this one (scroll down) and
2. this

I can't see how I can contact the blogger who took the first picture, and as for the second, there's some stuff about copyright at the bottom, but the photo is c75 years old and surely must be out of copyright, whatever Leeds City Library says? Any thoughts on either or both? --GuillaumeTell 17:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-06T17:34:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-08-06T17:34:00.000Z-Brotherton_Library","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-06T20:23:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-08-06T17:34:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

• Re the blogger, she's still blogging actively so why not just add a comment saying that you'd like to include her photo in WP and would she like to upload it to Commons (telling her how to do it), or to Flickr with the appropriate permissions, for the glory of seeing her photo used in the encyclopedia? It would be much more complicated for her to give you permission to lift it from her blog into Commons. I don't know how alerting of comments on old blog items works, though: perhaps add another comment, on a more recent item, just to say "Hallo, Please see the comment I've just left at .... "?

Re the Leodis photo: I'm terribly rusty on copyright, but I know photographs are a very tricky area especial when the photographer is not known. Can't off top of head remember the situation, but WP goes by US copyright law it seems, and the Fair Use clause might get you somewhere - see discussion at Swarcliffe where an image was deleted from a gallery but argments like "it couldn't be replaced because the buildings have been demolished" (or something like that) came into play. See http://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/200174/copyright_and_licences/360/duration_of_copyright_in_photographs for UK situation - a lot depends on whether the photographer is known and whether the photo was "published" before 1 Jan 1941.

Re the Brotherton book: no, haven't seen it, and there's no mention of it on library website. I wondered what it was when you had the shorter form of ref for it. Sounds a bit of a mess bibliographically speaking! What is it for - handing out to VIP visitors? Odd not to have an ISBN: how substantial is it? Might it be worth asking Chris S how it's going to be referred to (or catalogued)? (Nothing in catalogue with title "Be inspired" at present!)

PamD (talk) 20:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-06T20:23:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-06T20:23:00.000Z-GuillaumeTell-2011-08-06T17:34:00.000Z","replies":["c-GuillaumeTell-2011-08-10T17:05:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-06T20:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks for the congrats - I'm still tinkering with the article - also for the above advice (am pursuing it). I've emailed CS re the DYK, and have just had a reply, so no doubt he'll spread it around. The "Brotherton book" came to me through the post, together with an invite to Melvyn Bragg's King James Bible talk - presumably because of my (not very good) talk on early library automation. It's quite nicely done - 28pp in all (text: 11pp), lots of pictures and a timeline - but is a bit unclear whether it's about the BL or the UL as a whole (6 1/2 pp of text on the BL and Sp Colls, 1 1/2 pp on the EBL and HSL, 2pp on electronic stuff and a few collaborations. --GuillaumeTell 17:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-10T17:05:00.000Z","author":"GuillaumeTell","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-GuillaumeTell-2011-08-10T17:05:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-06T20:23:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Guillaume"}}-->

You're going to look at the edits made on the Swarcliffe page by other editors, and start to disagree with them, as they will disagree with you. It's a carcass that will be stripped of its flesh by vultures. Have fun.--andreasegde (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-08T22:17:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-08T22:17:00.000Z-Sooner_or_later","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-08T22:27:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-08T22:17:00.000Z"]}}-->

The ones I've seen so far all appeaer to be improvements. PamD (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-08T22:27:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-08T22:27:00.000Z-Andreasegde-2011-08-08T22:17:00.000Z","replies":["c-Andreasegde-2011-08-08T22:41:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-08T22:27:00.000Z"]}}-->

I'm sure they do appeaer [sic] to be that way. BTW, the next train leaves at 10:30. This will be at 22:30. :))--andreasegde (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-08T22:41:00.000Z","author":"Andreasegde","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Andreasegde-2011-08-08T22:41:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-08T22:27:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

To my talk page stalkers... I've decided to have a go at making a new signature! PamD 14:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T14:15:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-11T14:15:00.000Z-New_Signature","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Don't you have to give a reason to decline a speedy delete request.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z-Potts_again","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-11T19:20:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z","c-PamD-2011-08-11T19:41:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z"]}}-->

Sorry, I wrote an edit summary, thought I'd saved a null edit with that summary while forgetting to do the edit, then went back and removed the speedy with explanatory edit summary - but in fact I must have cancelled the first edit so the first edit summary didn't appear. Sorry about the confusion. The redirect is still there, as a hatnote - I quite agree that they are important and mustn't get lost or over-written. It might be more logical if speedy / prod / Afd templates appeared after navigational hatnotes, rather than before them. (In fact none of WP:HATNOTE, WP:LEAD and WP:LAYOUT seem to specify that deletion templates go before navigational hatnotes, distinct from the category "Maintenance templates" which are shown to go after them. Interesting.) PamD 19:20, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T19:20:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-11T19:20:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-Yaksar-2011-08-11T19:59:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-11T19:20:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

No worries, we all make a few edit summary slip ups. But I'm still confused about your removal of the speedy nomination; do you not think that the subject meets the A7 criteria? Thanks.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T19:59:00.000Z","author":"Yaksar","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Yaksar-2011-08-11T19:59:00.000Z-PamD-2011-08-11T19:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-11T22:55:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T19:59:00.000Z"]}}-->

My understanding is that the bar is set pretty low, and that the statement that he has exhibited his photos serves as an assertion of significance or however it's worded for A7. PamD 22:55, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T22:55:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-11T22:55:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T19:59:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

• See Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_policy#Placing_of_deletion_templates , where I've raised the issue. PamD 19:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-11T19:41:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-11T19:41:00.000Z-Yaksar-2011-08-11T18:59:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

The article Philip Simon has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Trevj (talk) 08:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-12T08:42:00.000Z","author":"Trevj","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trevj-2011-08-12T08:42:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Philip_Simon","replies":[]}}-->

Yoyr coments are much apreciated, and I will implement them within the next few minutes/hours. And I do know the essay is seen as long by some, and that there is a thought that a newcomer might be too bored and wander away, but it IS intended as a one-stop-shop. For myself, and in remembering how it was when I was new, I would have greatly appreciated were I to have found this primer in one place. At the bottom I will have a nice list of those other tutorials and help pages. As newcomers learn their way, I fully expect them to move on to the many other help pages we have here.

If you wish, please feel free to correct any typos or gender neutralizations as you feel proper. And I do hope you find THESE better than the originals.

That said, I'd love some input about the essay name. MANY thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-14T01:38:00.000Z","author":"MichaelQSchmidt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-14T01:38:00.000Z-Many_thanks_for_stepping_by","replies":["c-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-14T06:24:00.000Z-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-14T01:38:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Schmidt,"}}-->

• Copuld you check THIS I think it answers your suggestion and I kept it simple and not too scarey. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-14T06:24:00.000Z","author":"MichaelQSchmidt","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-14T06:24:00.000Z-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-14T01:38:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Schmidt,"}}-->

... for the stub sort on Race Today. I really have to brush up on the myriad types of stubs we have ... in the meantime, your stub sorting work is much appreciated. --JN466 13:12, 14 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-14T13:12:00.000Z","author":"Jayen466","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jayen466-2011-08-14T13:12:00.000Z-Thanks_4","replies":[],"displayName":"J"}}-->

Template:Letter-NumberCombination has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 23:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-14T23:00:00.000Z","author":"SMcCandlish","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SMcCandlish-2011-08-14T23:00:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Letter-NumberCombination","replies":[]}}-->

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		I am honored to award you this Barnstar for your work in catching my typos and your valued assistance in bringing Wikipedia:A Primer for newcomers to life for the community. It is hoped that newcomers will benefit from WP:NewbieGuide for years to come. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-16T05:54:00.000Z","author":"MichaelQSchmidt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MichaelQSchmidt-2011-08-16T05:54:00.000Z-Many_thanks","replies":[],"displayName":"Schmidt,"}}-->

FWIW, I made it reuse the existing code [1]. And I'll continue cleanup. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-23T16:12:00.000Z","author":"JHunterJ","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JHunterJ-2011-08-23T16:12:00.000Z-LetterCombination","replies":[]}}-->

I notice your edit summary said you were unsure of the notability of this player. I wasn't sure either. Any idea of where I should ask for input on this subject? i kan reed (talk) 20:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-23T20:32:00.000Z","author":"Ikanreed","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ikanreed-2011-08-23T20:32:00.000Z-Jamal_Blackman","replies":["c-PamD-2011-08-24T08:18:00.000Z-Ikanreed-2011-08-23T20:32:00.000Z"],"displayName":"i kan reed"}}-->

WP:NFOOTY - and I doubt that he passes. PamD 08:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-24T08:18:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-08-24T08:18:00.000Z-Ikanreed-2011-08-23T20:32:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Hi, saw your issue on OhConfucius's page. Dashes, definitely, and unspaced. I suspect he'll do some experiments to determine why the inconsistency arose. Thanks for your spotting of this. Tony (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-24T08:58:00.000Z","author":"Tony1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tony1-2011-08-24T08:58:00.000Z-Leeds","replies":[],"displayName":"Tony"}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikify.
Message added 22:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 22:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-27T22:45:00.000Z","author":"Nolelover","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nolelover-2011-08-27T22:45:00.000Z-Talkback_2","replies":[]}}-->

For the blood donations. I happened to see it on your userpage. Ryan Vesey Review me! 23:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-27T23:48:00.000Z","author":"Ryan Vesey","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ryan_Vesey-2011-08-27T23:48:00.000Z-Thanks_5","replies":[],"displayName":"Ryan"}}-->

Thank you for your comments at WT:WWF and your recent edits on the Project page. Every extra pair of eyes helps so much. Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 23:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-08-31T23:49:00.000Z","author":"Nolelover","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nolelover-2011-08-31T23:49:00.000Z-Just_want_to_say...","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there. Just a quick FYI re: your change to this article. From MOS:ALBUM: "Songs and singles are placed in "quotation marks", album titles are italicized and artists are left alone". Thought you may like to know =) Nikthestoned 09:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-01T09:00:00.000Z","author":"Nikthestoned","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nikthestoned-2011-09-01T09:00:00.000Z-RE:_Philip_Castle","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-01T09:45:00.000Z-Nikthestoned-2011-09-01T09:00:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Nik"}}-->

Thanks for the reminder - I think I thought twice about the single but couldn't be bothered to check (sloppy editing!), and left the Wings tour in italics which someone else had given it. I probably did the article more good than harm on balance! PamD 09:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-01T09:45:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-01T09:45:00.000Z-Nikthestoned-2011-09-01T09:00:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Many thanks for correctly formatting the updating of the article on the Radio Four series called Great Lives. I tried to update it myself, but I was not sure that I was getting the format correct. I also noticed that you put in a lot more information - so it is good to see things are working out exactly as wikis should, in this co-operative way. Again, many thanks for the information and correct formatting of the article, it looks a lot better now for being updated correctly. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-06T23:31:00.000Z","author":"ACEOREVIVED","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-06T23:31:00.000Z-Many_thanks_2","replies":[]}}-->

Dear Pam, Thanks for your concern but according to the ecclesiastical law and church canons, if any part or a section of a cemetery has been blessed by a Church of England bishop,it is an Anglican cemetery,regardless of the non-conformists/dissenters resting there,as Roman Catholics were allowed to be buried in Church of Ireland/Anglican cemeteries in the past.

On Monday 20th May 1839, The Highgate cemetery was dedicated to St James by the Right Reverend Charles James Bloomfield, Lord Bishop of London. 15 acres were consecrated for the use of the Church of England and 2 acres set aside for dissenters. Rights of burial were sold for either limited period or in perpetuity. The first burial on 26th May was Elizabeth Jackson of Little Windmill Street, Soho.

Evangelidis (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-07T18:59:00.000Z","author":"Evangelidis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Evangelidis-2011-09-07T18:59:00.000Z-Cemeteries","replies":[]}}-->

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 41 - September 2011 August issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the forty first WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 9,157 last month to 9,229 on August 24th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 70 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 65. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,778 articles. Currently we have twenty seven Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton • Halifax Gibbet • Gerard (archbishop of York) There are also twelve featured lists: York City F.C. Clubman of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Swarcliffe GA nomination withdrawn on July 31st 2010–11 York City F.C. season promoted to GA on August 4th Swarcliffe nominated for GA on August 4th Swarcliffe GA nomination withdrawn on August 15th Whitby nominated for GA on August 21st James Cook peer review initiated on August 22nd Hedley Verity promoted to GA on August 22nd Gerard (archbishop of York) promoted to FA on August 23rd George Hirst nominated for FA on August 24th Member News There are now 88 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the August newsletter: PatHadley (talk · contribs) One members left the project this month: Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs) The number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 31 August 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Back to school September and October are the months when many young people move from one school to a new school, or to university. It tends to be a time when freshers "look up" their new schools and colleges on Wikipedia and decide to edit for the first time. Many additions to school articles, in the past, have been unsourced, some poorly formatted and some in violation of other Wikipedia policies. More experienced editors can help here. It is easy to become frustrated, hit revert and issue a warning of some sort. How off-putting for a new editor. New editors do make innocent mistakes and it is up to us all to try to welcome and support them; perhaps by issuing a welcome message, helping them to find sources or format references and citations. Obviously, not all will turn out to be paragons of Wikipedia virtue, but we can at least give them the opportunity. May be it is time for us all to re-read the essay Please do not bite the newcomers. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The September 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XVIII 1 Jun 2011 ~ 30 Jun 2011 Leeds United A.F.C. and Manchester United F.C. rivalry Paull Holme Tower XIX 1 Jul 2011 ~ 31 Jul 2011 Whitby The History Boys XX 1 Aug 2011 ~ 31 Aug 2011 James Cook Levitt Hagg XXI 1 Sept 2011 ~ 30 Sept 2011 Holmfirth Branch Line The Society of M.I.C.E. Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Harkey Lodger and Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 14:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-09T14:23:00.000Z","author":"ENewsBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ENewsBot-2011-09-09T14:23:00.000Z-WikiProject_Yorkshire_Newsletter_-_September_2011","replies":[]}}-->

When I looked at the article, I assumed the news article was going to be about something else other than his death. Secondly, because the news article wasn't used as a reference, I also assumed it wasn't related. SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-09T23:07:00.000Z","author":"SwisterTwister","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SwisterTwister-2011-09-09T23:07:00.000Z-Re:_Arthur_Kozlowski","replies":[]}}-->

Hi there Pam

I'm new to Wiki and have mailed a couple of friends about doing updates for the page. Artur was very well known in Ireland and the UK... There are publications in Irish Speleology and many websites with finds etc. An example of a publication is on the Irish Times website http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2010/0910/1224278569802.html This is the 4km cave traverse that is mentioned in the exploration page.

Thank you so much for hte work you have already carried out to the page links etc... Regards Mark BTW I'm using a wireless winowds keyboard on a mac.... cant do the sign off, sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markodonohoe (talk • contribs) 23:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-09T23:34:00.000Z","author":"Markodonohoe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Markodonohoe-2011-09-09T23:34:00.000Z-Artur_Conrad_Kozlowski","replies":[]}}-->

Was it really helpful to keep replacing a blp prod, when it would have been so very easy to source it? . DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-11T20:16:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DGG-2011-09-11T20:16:00.000Z-Son_Myung-soon","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-11T21:00:00.000Z-DGG-2011-09-11T20:16:00.000Z"]}}-->

Perhaps you should ask the person who PRODded it why they didn't source it first. I just came across the article to stub-sort it, observed that the original editor had removed the BLPPROD tag so replaced it (leaving them a message about it), and when another editor removed it I replaced it again (and left them a message too). I think editors should be told that it's inappropriate to remove the BLPPROD tag. A quick google on the name didn't actually produce any WP:RS in the first few pages, and neither of the interwiki links are in languages I can read. I could have just ignored the removal of the BLPPROD, but that didn't seem helpful. PamD 21:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-11T21:00:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-11T21:00:00.000Z-DGG-2011-09-11T20:16:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Thank you for leaving a message on my anwerpage (you have been the latest Wikipedian to do so as of at 13 September 2011), ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-13T20:08:00.000Z","author":"ACEOREVIVED","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-13T20:08:00.000Z-Thank_you","replies":[]}}-->

What about Philippine five centavo coin? There is no text, either! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.205.82.104 (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-16T14:55:00.000Z","author":"112.205.82.104","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-112.205.82.104-2011-09-16T14:55:00.000Z-Hello","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-16T15:14:00.000Z-112.205.82.104-2011-09-16T14:55:00.000Z"]}}-->

Good point - have PRODded several more. PamD 15:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-16T15:14:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-16T15:14:00.000Z-112.205.82.104-2011-09-16T14:55:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Hi, I've just come across this template for the first time because Yorkshire is on my watchlist.

A couple of pointss;

1. I don't think the addition of the headline "Additional, more specific, and related topics may be found at:" is either useful (a personal view) or (as far as I can see) allowed by WP:SEEALSO. Has it been discussed anywhere? (I also raised it at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Layout#.7B.7BSatop.7D.7D before I thought of coming here to your own talk page).
2. What set of articles is the template intended to be used on? If less than 100% of articles with "See also" sections, then the reader will be left puzzled as to why some have the "headline" and others don't.
3. I'm puzzled by the statement "The See also section of a Wikipedia article should normally terminate with either a
   template or a navagation bar template.". As far as I know the SA section normally terminates with the start of the References section, and any navbox doesn't come until after External Links (WP:FOOTER lists the sections). Is that statement telling me to add {{clear}} at the end of every "See also" section?

PamD 23:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-14T23:08:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-14T23:08:00.000Z-Concerns_about_{{Satop}}","replies":["c-Buaidh-2011-09-15T14:09:00.000Z-PamD-2011-09-14T23:08:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

You raise some excellent points about Template:Satop.

1. There seems to be a great deal of confusion among editors as to what belongs in the See also section of an article. I added an optional headline to Template:Satop in an attempt to to add a human touch to a possibly incoherent collection of internal links. The default headline can either be changed to something more meaningful or changed to default to no headline.
2. Template:Satop was designed to be used in articles referenced by WikiProject Outline of Knowledge, but I {hopefully} made it sufficiently general to be used in any article.
3. I added the note about terminating the See also section because Template:Satop is dynamic and may change in appearance as additional portals are created. An invocation of Template:Clear at the end of the See also section keeps Template:Satop from running into the References section. I added the navbar reference because some editors add relevant navbars to the end of the See also section, but that reference is superfluous and I will remove it.

I would like to hear your comments. Yours aye,  Buaidh  14:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-15T14:09:00.000Z","author":"Buaidh","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Buaidh-2011-09-15T14:09:00.000Z-PamD-2011-09-14T23:08:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Jay-Sebastos's talk page.
Message added 14:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-18T14:26:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-18T14:26:00.000Z-Talkback_3","replies":[]}}-->

Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 14:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-18T14:26:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-18T14:26:00.000Z-Talkback_3-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Jay"}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Jay-Sebastos's talk page.
Message added 20:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-18T20:36:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-18T20:36:00.000Z-Talkback_4","replies":[]}}-->

Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 20:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-18T20:36:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-18T20:36:00.000Z-Talkback_4-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Jay"}}-->

That is pretty good, though one thing I am wondering about is how legendary it is. The combination of pegasus/unicorn might actually be a 20th century concept. I haven't been able to find any horned pegasi/winged unicorns prior to the british using it during WW2, which was just a modification of a pegasus. Bonechamber (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T07:23:00.000Z","author":"Bonechamber","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bonechamber-2011-09-19T07:23:00.000Z-Legendary_creature_stub","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-19T07:48:00.000Z-Bonechamber-2011-09-19T07:23:00.000Z"]}}-->

Hmm, we could add {{fictional-stub}} as a second stubtype! But perhaps we could argue that a variation of a legendary creature is still a legendary creature (all unicorns are legendary, with or without wings?) PamD 07:48, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T07:48:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-19T07:48:00.000Z-Bonechamber-2011-09-19T07:23:00.000Z","replies":["c-Bonechamber-2011-09-19T07:53:00.000Z-PamD-2011-09-19T07:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

I'm sort of lost at this point, I always figured pegasi/unicorns were fictional even if some people in the olden days took them literally. I guess it's a good question to figure out if people take the winged unicorn concept literally. I scrounged through the wikimedia picture archives of both legendary equines and found very few instances of overlap, so at least so far I have to assume it's a pretty recent idea. Bonechamber (talk) 07:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T07:53:00.000Z","author":"Bonechamber","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Bonechamber-2011-09-19T07:53:00.000Z-PamD-2011-09-19T07:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Jay-Sebastos's talk page.
Message added 18:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T18:29:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-19T18:29:00.000Z-Talkback_5","replies":[]}}-->

Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 18:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T18:29:00.000Z","author":"Jay-Sebastos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jay-Sebastos-2011-09-19T18:29:00.000Z-Talkback_5-1","replies":[],"displayName":"Jay"}}-->

I have reverted DGGs edits in the philippine centavo coin articles. As long as there is no text it seems really silly to keep those "articles". If he says, it is trivial to write a text about it, then I don't understand why he is not able to make such ones. It won't serve any good to the Philippine writers giving them the reputation of lousy writers with such state of articles. -- 112.205.18.138 (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-22T14:01:00.000Z","author":"112.205.18.138","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-112.205.18.138-2011-09-22T14:01:00.000Z-reverts","replies":[]}}-->

I believe it is now considered that an infobox is enough information to escape deletion, adding text is just rewriting the infobox, and is so trivial it could be done by a bot. I've accordingly deprodded. DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-19T04:02:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DGG-2011-09-19T04:02:00.000Z-Philippine_coins","replies":["c-112.205.18.138-2011-09-26T06:00:00.000Z-DGG-2011-09-19T04:02:00.000Z"]}}-->

Still there is no text. Shouldn't there be another PROD again? -- 112.205.18.138 (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-26T06:00:00.000Z","author":"112.205.18.138","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-112.205.18.138-2011-09-26T06:00:00.000Z-DGG-2011-09-19T04:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-26T07:33:00.000Z-112.205.18.138-2011-09-26T06:00:00.000Z"]}}-->

I realised the presence of an infobox was enough to prevent speedy deletion under "no content", but not sure of any rules about PROD deletions. I hoped the PRODs would encourage someone interested in the Philippines, or coins, to improve the articles. In reply to 112: no, PROD can only be used once on an article (I see that you, or someone, has re-PRODded them, and they have been de-PRODded). I've left a note on the talk page of the Philippines project encouraging someone to come and improve them, and I see that one article has already been improved. PamD 07:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-26T07:33:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-26T07:33:00.000Z-112.205.18.138-2011-09-26T06:00:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

The artice on the Radio Four series "Great Lives" needs an update - Cerys Matthews championed Hildegard of Bingen in a most interesting programme. Could you please see to updating it - you can see my comments on the talk page explaining why I would appreciate an update! ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-21T15:47:00.000Z","author":"ACEOREVIVED","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-21T15:47:00.000Z-Page_on_Great_Lives","replies":[]}}-->

I have done it myself now, so I shall leave it to you to check that I got the format right (using a copy and paste method, I think I managed it!) Please excuse me if I got things wrong in the past - I know that people do get things wrong at times (just think of how many people would have got future tense wrong in that last sentence!) ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-21T22:50:00.000Z","author":"ACEOREVIVED","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-21T22:50:00.000Z-Page_on_Great_Lives","replies":["c-PamD-2011-09-24T21:18:00.000Z-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-21T22:50:00.000Z"]}}-->

Looks good, thanks. PamD 21:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-09-24T21:18:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-09-24T21:18:00.000Z-ACEOREVIVED-2011-09-21T22:50:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Any of my talk page stalkers who are women might like to help User:SarahStierch by completing her survey of female wikipedians here. PamD 09:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-03T09:08:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PamD-2011-10-03T09:08:00.000Z-Survey_for_female_editors","replies":["c-PamD-2011-10-03T15:59:00.000Z-PamD-2011-10-03T09:08:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

... But don't delay, as the survey closes this Friday, 7th Oct! PamD 15:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-03T15:59:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-10-03T15:59:00.000Z-PamD-2011-10-03T09:08:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Thanks very much for all of your stub sorting and other cleanup efforts. I hope you enjoy this kitten.

KathrynLybarger (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-04T17:56:00.000Z","author":"KathrynLybarger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KathrynLybarger-2011-10-04T17:56:00.000Z-Thank_you!","replies":["c-PamD-2011-10-04T21:47:00.000Z-KathrynLybarger-2011-10-04T17:56:00.000Z"]}}-->

Thanks, Kathryn - what a lot of librarians there are around on WP! I guess it's because helping other people to access information is what we're about. PamD 21:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-04T21:47:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-10-04T21:47:00.000Z-KathrynLybarger-2011-10-04T17:56:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Hi there. This IP editor has been systematically erasing all references to Liberal Democrats voting on tuition fees. I see you have reverted one of these. There's a discussion at User talk:Keith D#Liberal Democrats and tuition fees Nunquam Dormio (talk) 06:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-05T06:32:00.000Z","author":"Nunquam Dormio","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nunquam_Dormio-2011-10-05T06:32:00.000Z-Liberal_Democrats_and_tuition_fees","replies":[]}}-->

Resolved

Thanks for uploading File:Lancashire Coastal Way logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-08T06:37:00.000Z","author":"Skier Dude","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Skier_Dude-2011-10-08T06:37:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Lancashire_Coastal_Way_logo.gif","replies":[]}}-->

Assuming you have clearance and/or have permission to remove the template then it may have been a mistake on my part, however it has since been edited and when i tagged it originally it said and i quote,

"a my little pony friendship is magic game on the iphone in this game twilight sparkle is tasked with teaching cheerilee's class a lesson about the canterlot castle"

With NO references, external links etc. In the eyes of many editors this would probably been seen as childish/gibberish ecetera. I tagged it more on the grounds of having no meaningful content or history rather than being "unsalvageably incoherent" as you stated on my page. Also accusing me of WP:BITE is ludicrus because if you check my contributions i am always welcoming and encouraging to new editors (and actually it was me who originally welcomed him/her to wikipedia) and even people who vandalise and do incoherent edits i always assume good faith and try and encourage them to act with responsibility. At any rate i see the article has been edited to adequete standards, So thanks for the notifying me :) Goldblooded (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-09T16:10:00.000Z","author":"Goldblooded","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Goldblooded-2011-10-09T16:10:00.000Z-Response","replies":["c-PamD-2011-10-09T16:23:00.000Z-Goldblooded-2011-10-09T16:10:00.000Z"]}}-->

The message left on the editor's page says that the article is being nominated for deletion "because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.".

It's worrying that you have to "assume" that I have the right to remove your speedy template from Twilight Sparkle: Teacher for a Day: if you actually read the template, you can see that it says: "If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." - in other words, any editor other than the page creator may remove that template. It did not meet the criterion, but I improved it anyway. Please slow down and read the templates you are using.

Looking at the article above I realised that "Friendship is magic" looked like a key phrase, searched on it, and found the article My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic to which I then linked that phrase. Not rocket science, just needs a little patience and imagination. The second line of text, from "in this game..." makes sense, if you add a few capital letters, as the plot line of this game. That seems to be "meaningful content". PamD 16:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)__DTREPLYBUTTONSCONTENT__-->__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-10-09T16:23:00.000Z","author":"PamD","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-PamD-2011-10-09T16:23:00.000Z-Goldblooded-2011-10-09T16:10:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Pam"}}-->

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol.
Message added 16:25, 9 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, PamD. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol.
Message added 17:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 42 - October 2011 September issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the forty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 9,229 last month to 9,255 on September 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 69 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 66. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 51 out of a total number of 2,813 articles. Currently we have twenty eight Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • Caedmon • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (bishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton • Halifax Gibbet • Gerard (archbishop of York) • George Hirst There are also twelve featured lists: York City F.C. Clubman of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Ed Miliband promoted to GA on September 12th Webster's Brewery peer review initiated on September 12th George Hirst promoted to FA on September 27th Member News There are now 88 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! There has been no change in membership since the September newsletter: The number of active members is still currently low. Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 137 360 572 C 5 144 294 1,501 1,944 Start 1 242 1,263 8,705 10,211 Stub 21 352 5,655 3 6,031 List 4 12 955 971 Category 3,887 3,887 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 226 226 Redirect 2 196 1,355 1,553 Template 619 619 NA 8 8 Other 10 10 Assessed 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 Total 19 485 2,112 17,623 6,246 26,485 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 97,155 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 30 September 2011, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)  Thanks Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. New software release October sees the next release of the MediaWiki software (version 1.8) that runs the English Wikipedia. It will probably live by the time the newsletter arrives by the last few month's delivery dates! If you see any problems with the page display on any articles or problems with your favourite gadget or script then it may be a problem with the new release of software. It is worth checking out the Village Pump - Technical board to see if there has been any report of a similar problem. If not then raise a new thread to get it recorded and to see if there are any of the technical people that can point you at a solution. Hopefully things will go smoother than previous releases but these things always throw up obscure problems that have not been foreseen. If you are interested in the detail of the changes made in this release then take a look at the full list. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The October 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice XIX 1 Jul 2011 ~ 31 Jul 2011 Whitby The History Boys XX 1 Aug 2011 ~ 31 Aug 2011 James Cook Levitt Hagg XXI 1 Sept 2011 ~ 30 Sept 2011 Holmfirth Branch Line The Society of M.I.C.E. XXII 1 Oct 2011 ~ 31 Oct 2011 Howden Tinsley railway station Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Harkey Lodger and Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!